VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter VIII › Section 139
Chapter VIIIwas s.80

Section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 139 — Deductions in respect of profits and gains by an undertaking or enterprise engaged in development of Special Economic Zone. Successor to s.80 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 139 is in Chapter VIII — Deductions to Be Made in Computing Total Income, which runs from section 122 to section 154.

← Section 138  ·  Section 140 →

What this section does

The section preserves a deduction that originated under the repealed Act. For any tax year, where the gross total income of an assessee being a Developer includes profits and gains derived by an undertaking or an enterprise from any business of developing a Special Economic Zone notified on or after 1st April, 2005 under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 and referred to in section 80-iab of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and where that assessee is eligible to claim a deduction from those profits for that tax year under section 80-iab as if the 1961 Act had not been repealed, a deduction from those profits and gains is to be allowed in computing his total income. Two conditions govern it: the amount of the deduction is calculated as per section 80-iab of the 1961 Act, and the deduction under this Act is allowed only for such tax years as would have been allowed under section 80-iab as if that Act had not been repealed.

Why it is there

The deduction for a Special Economic Zone Developer ran for a fixed run of years under the old Act, and repeal would have cut it off part way through for Developers who had committed on the strength of it. This section carries the unexpired part of that entitlement into the new Act by reference, without re-enacting the scheme, so that both the amount and the number of remaining years continue to be measured by the old section.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Earliest notification date for the ZoneOn or after the 1st April, 2005The Special Economic Zone must have been notified on or after that date under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005Clause (a)
Amount of the deductionNot stated in this section — as calculated under section 80-iab of the Income-tax Act, 1961Condition (i); the section fixes no rate or percentage of its ownClause (i)
Number of tax years for which it is allowedNot stated in this section — only such tax years as would have been allowed under section 80-iab of the 1961 ActCondition (ii), computed as if the 1961 Act had not been repealedClause (ii)

What this means in practice

Nothing about the size or the length of this deduction can be worked out from the section in front of you. Both conditions point outward to section 80-iab of the Income-tax Act, 1961: the amount is calculated under it, and the years are the years it would have allowed had it never been repealed. The consequence is that years already used up under the old Act are gone — this is the tail of an existing entitlement, not a fresh grant. Clause (b) adds a live eligibility test for the particular tax year, so a Developer who would have failed the old section's conditions in that year gets nothing here either.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A Developer of a Special Economic Zone notified in 2015 had been claiming the section 80-iab deduction and, when the 1961 Act was repealed, still had part of that run of years left. Section 139 lets it continue to claim, for those remaining years only, an amount computed exactly as section 80-iab would have computed it. A Developer whose section 80-iab years had already run out, or whose Zone was notified before 1 April 2005, gets no deduction under this section.

Where you meet this section

In the Chapter VIII deduction claimed in a Developer's return, and in an assessment where the Assessing Officer questions eligibility, the amount, or how many years of the old section 80-iab entitlement remain.

The words themselves

the amount of deduction is calculated as per the provisions of section 80-IAB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961)
Section 139(i), Income-tax Act, 2025.
the deduction under this Act shall be allowed only for such tax years, as would have been allowed under section 80-IAB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), as if the said Act had not been repealed
Section 139(ii), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Rules that serve this section

Rules of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 that work section 139. Where the rule’s own heading names the section we say so; the rest are marked on reading the rule, which is our derivation and not the department’s. A rule that serves the section silently and that we have missed will not appear here.

All of them are in the Rules 2026 index.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See every circular and notification on this section, or the circulars index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See every circular and notification on this section, or the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 139. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.