VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCirculars1995 › Circular No. 731
CBDT circular 20 December 1995

Circular No. 731

604. Eligibility for deduction under section 80-O in case of receipt of brokerage by reinsurance agent, operating in India on behalf of principals abroad, from gross premia before remittance to his foreign principals

What this is

Circular No. 731 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 20 December 1995. Its subject is 604. Eligibility for deduction under section 80-O in case of receipt of brokerage by reinsurance agent, operating in India on behalf of principals abroad, from gross premia before remittance to his foreign principals.

What it does

Holds that a reinsurance broker in India who keeps his brokerage out of the gross premia before remitting the balance abroad gets the section 80-O deduction just as he would if he remitted the gross premia and received his brokerage back through banking channels. Section 80-O allowed a resident a deduction of fifty per cent of royalty, commission or fees received from a foreign Government or foreign enterprise, on the condition that the income is received in India in convertible foreign exchange or brought into India in accordance with the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973. The Board's view is that the deduction is available on the netting-off method as well, so long as the currency in which the premia is remitted is convertible foreign exchange under that Act.

Why it was issued

Reinsurance brokers had used the netting method until 1987 and then switched to remitting gross premia and receiving brokerage back, purely to secure the section 80-O deduction. The Reserve Bank of India took the view that the principle behind both routes is the same and the earlier method is administratively more convenient.

Who it reaches

The provisions it speaks to

Left, the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the instrument itself names it. Right, the section of the Income-tax Act, 2025 that the department’s own concordance maps it to — which is where the same ground is now covered.
Under the 1961 ActNow
s.80s.121, s.138, s.139, s.140, s.141, s.142, s.143

The instrument, as the Board published it

The words below are the department’s own, reproduced from its published text. Where the department’s copy carried a publisher’s notes after the instrument, those are not reproduced.

604. Eligibility for deduction under section 80-O in case of receipt of brokerage by reinsurance agent, operating in India on behalf of principals abroad, from gross premia before remittance to his foreign principals
1. Under the provisions of section 80-O of the Income-tax Act, 1961 an Indian company or a non-corporate assessee, who is resi­dent in India, is entitled to a deduction of fifty per cent of the income received by way of royalty, commission, fees, etc., from a foreign Government or foreign enterprise for the use outside India of any patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process, etc., or in consideration of technical or professional services rendered by the resident. The deduction is available if such income is received in India in convertible foreign exchange, or having been converted into convertible foreign exchange outside India, is brought in by or on behalf of the Indian company or aforementioned assessee in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 for the time being in force.
2. Reinsurance brokers, operating in India on behalf of princi­pals abroad, are required to collect the reinsurance premia from ceding insurance companies in India and remit the same to their principals. In such cases, brokerage can be paid either by allow­ing the brokers to deduct their brokerage out of the gross premia collected from Indian insurance companies and remit the net premia overseas, or they could simply remit the gross premia and get back their brokerage in the form of remittance through bank­ing channels.
3. The Reserve Bank of India have expressed the view that since the principle underlying both the transactions is the same, there is no difference between the two modes of brokerage payment. In fact, the former method is administratively more convenient and the reinsurance brokers had been following this method till 1987 when they switched over to the second method to avail of deduc­tion under section 80-O of the Act.
4. The matter has been examined. The condition for deduction under section 80-O is that the receipt should be in convertible foreign exchange. When the commission is remitted abroad, it should be in a currency that is regarded as convertible foreign exchange according to FERA. The Board are of the view that in such cases the receipt of brokerage by a reinsurance agent in India from the gross premia before remittance to his foreign principals will also be entitled to the deduction under section 80-O of the Act.
Circular : No 731, dated 20-12-1995.

What to watch

Where you meet it

In an assessment where a section 80-O claim on brokerage retained out of gross premia has been refused for want of receipt in convertible foreign exchange.

An example

Ours, not the Board’s: a worked case built from the rule the instrument sets, to show how it falls out.

A broker collects Rs. 1 crore of reinsurance premia from Indian ceding companies, keeps brokerage of Rs. 10 lakh and remits the balance abroad in convertible foreign exchange. On the Board's view the Rs. 10 lakh so retained is eligible for the section 80-O deduction of fifty per cent, the same as if he had remitted the full Rs. 1 crore and had the Rs. 10 lakh sent back to him through a bank.

On the same provision

Other instruments in this library that name the same provision of the 1961 Act. They are not necessarily still operative, and a later one may have replaced an earlier one without saying so.

← Circular No. 732  ·  Circular No. 730 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.