VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Circulars › 2019 › Circular No. 15/2019
CBDT circular 12 July 2019

Circular No. 15/2019

Issues in respect of payment of third installment under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016- clarification on certain procedural issues under section 195 of the Income Disclosure Scheme, 2016 read with section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961-reg

What this is

Circular No. 15/2019 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 12 July 2019. Its subject is Issues in respect of payment of third installment under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016- clarification on certain procedural issues under section 195 of the Income Disclosure Scheme, 2016 read with section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961-reg.

This is a clarification. The Board is stating how it reads a provision. That reading binds the department; it does not bind a court, and where the section says otherwise the section wins.

What it does

Rescues declarants under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 who could not pay the third instalment by 30 September 2017 because the banks were shut. Since 30 September, 1 October and 2 October 2017 were all closed and regular banking could resume only on 3 October 2017, the Board directs, applying section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, that a payment made on 3 October 2017 be deemed paid by the due date of 30 September 2017. Further, where payment by cheque, real time gross settlement or electronic transfer was tendered by 3 October 2017 and credited by the bank up to 5 October 2017, it too is deemed paid by 30 September 2017, the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner concerned furnishing a report to the Principal Director General of Income-tax (Systems) after verification. All consequential action, by declarants or by the departmental authorities, was to be completed by 31 August 2019.

Why it was issued

Several references were filed by stakeholders about the difficulty faced in paying the third instalment around 30 September 2017 because of bank holidays, and a request was made under section 119 of the Income-tax Act read with section 195 of the Scheme to grant relief; a late payment would otherwise have rendered the declaration void.

Who it reaches

The provisions it speaks to

Left, the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the instrument itself names it. Right, the section of the Income-tax Act, 2025 that the department’s own concordance maps it to — which is where the same ground is now covered.
Under the 1961 ActNow
s.10s.11, s.19
s.119s.239
s.195s.393, s.395, s.397, s.400

The instrument, as the Board published it

The department publishes this one only as a PDF, so the words below were read out of that PDF by machine. That reading can carry its own mistakes — a misread number, a broken line. Check the signed document before you rely on a figure in it.

Circular No. I5' .. .j2019 Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Direct Taxes (ITA.I1) ~ North Block, New Delhi, the I.). of July, 2019 Subject: Issues in respect of payment of third installment under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016- clarification on certain procedural issues under section 195 of the Income Disclosure Scheme, 2016 read with section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961-reg.- Under the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 (IDS), declarants were required to pay their determined liability towards tax, surcharge and penalty pertaining to the third installment as per the Form-2 issued by the Pro CIT/CIT, by 30th September, 2017. In this regard, several references have been filed by the stakeholders with the Central Board of Direct Taxes (the Board) regarding difficulties faced by the declarants while effecting payment of third installment of IDS around 30th September, 2017 due to closure of banks on account of holidays due to which they couldn't effect payment of third installment within the stipulated time. Hence, a request has been made to the Board under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act) read with section 195 of the IDS to grant appropriate relief in such cases. 2. Bank Holidays towards the due-date for the third installment: A clarification has been sought by the stakeholders regarding the third installment stating that since 30th September, 2017 was a closed national holiday, whether the payments effected or completed on next working day of the banks would be treated as an on-time payment of the statutory liability towards the third installment. It is seen that 1St October,2017 & 2nd October, 2017 were also closed bank holidays, therefore, regular banking transactions could take place only on 3rd October, 2017 after 30th September, 2017. Therefore, in accordance with provisions of section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, the Board hereby directs that all payments made/effected by the declarants on 3rd October, 2017 shall also be deemed to have been paid by the due date for the third installment i.e. 30th September, 2017. 3. Delayed credit by the Bank while payment was tendered by the declarant in a timely manner: In some of the references, it is stated that payment through cheque, RTGS, electronic transfer etc. towards payment of liability was tendered in the bank on or before 30th September, 2017. However, on bank's endorsement, the date is mentioned after 30th September, 2017, which could render these declarations void. The genuine hardship of the declarants on account of procedural/technical issues with the banks has been considered. It has been decided that payments effected through cheque/RTGS/electronic transfer by the declarant by 3rd of October, 2017 (the deemed extended date for the third installment as per para 2 above) which were credited by the banks till 5th October, 2017 shall be deemed to have been paid by 30th September, 2017. In this regard, the concerned Pro CIT/CIT shall furnish a report to the Pro DGIT (Systems) after necessary verification; to treat such payments to have been paid by the due date for the third installment i.e. 30th September, 2017. 4. All actions which are to be completed as a consequence of this order either by the declarants or the departmental authorities are to be completed, by 31St August, 2019. 5. Hindi version to follow. (F. No. 225/282/2017-ITA.II) Copy to:- -~~" (Rajarajeswari R.) Under Secretary to Government of India i. PS to FM/OSD to FM/PS to MoS(F)/OSD to MoS(F) ii. PS to Secretary (Revenue)/(Finance) iii. Chairman, CBDT & All Members, CBDT iv. All Pro CCsIT / Pro DsGIT v. All Joint Secretaries/CsIT, CBDT vi. CIT (M& TP), Official Spokesperson of CBDT vii. % Pro DGIT (Systems) for uploading on official website viii. Add I. CIT (Database Cell) for uploading on departmental website ~~4 ~\13 (Raja~jes an1i.) Under Secretary to Government of India

What to watch

Where you meet it

Where a declaration under the 2016 Scheme was treated as void for late payment of the third instalment and the Form-4 certificate was withheld.

On the same provision

Other instruments in this library that name the same provision of the 1961 Act. They are not necessarily still operative, and a later one may have replaced an earlier one without saying so.

← F No. 370149/230/2017-TPL  ·  Circular No. 14/2019 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.