VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › CBDT Circulars & Instructions › Statutory position — s.80-IAC: the start-up deduction, the incorporation cut-off, and the s.80AC bar on a late return
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both wayss.80-IACs.80ACs.80A(5)s.80-IAs.139(1)s.33B

Statutory position — s.80-IAC: the start-up deduction, the incorporation cut-off, and the s.80AC bar on a late return

Until when must a start-up be incorporated to claim s.80-IAC, and what happens to the claim if the return is filed late?

The Income-tax Act, 1961 was repealed on 1 April 2026. It still governs income earned up to 31 March 2026, and every proceeding about those years however late — assessment, reassessment, rectification, penalty, revision and appeal alike. Income earned from 1 April 2026 is governed by the Income-tax Act, 2025. What changed, and which Act governs your year →

Until when must a start-up be incorporated to claim s.80-IAC, and what happens to the claim if the return is filed late?

As the section currently reads, an eligible start-up must be incorporated on or after 1 April 2016 but before 1 April 2030 — the date was substituted for 2025 by Act No. 7 of 2025 with effect from 1 April 2025, which is the extension relied on here. The deduction is one hundred per cent of the profits of the eligible business for three consecutive assessment years, claimable at the assessee's option out of ten years beginning with the year of incorporation, and it is lost entirely if the return is filed after the due date under s.139(1), because s.80AC bars every deduction under the Chapter VI-A heading 'C.—Deductions in respect of certain incomes' in that event.

Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) on 2025-04-01, reported as Section 80-IAC, Income-tax Act 1961, incorporation cut-off substituted by Act No. 7 of 2025 with effect from 1 April 2025; section 80AC as substituted by the Finance Act 2018 with effect from 1 April 2018. It bears on section 80-IAC, section 80AC, section 80A(5), section 80-IA, section 139(1), section 33B of the Income Tax Act 1961, in Deductions & Disallowances and Assessment & Scrutiny matters.

Still good law. The text of s.80-IAC is taken from the current text of the section, which names Act No. 7 of 2025 as the enactment that substituted the 1 April 2030 cut-off with effect from 1 April 2025. The text of s.80AC is taken from a Karnataka High Court judgment of 13 January 2026 reproducing it, and not from a consolidated text of the Act, because the older consolidations in circulation carry the pre-2018 text. No search for judicial decisions construing s.80-IAC itself has been made; the only decision recorded that touches it, Herald Global Ventures Private Limited v CCIT-1 (Gujarat High Court, 16 March 2026), concerns the consequence of an Inter-Ministerial Board refusal and not the construction of the section. Two things are worth keeping in view for a live claim: the s.80AC bar is absolute on a late return, and s.80A(5) bars a deduction not claimed in the return at all, so the filing discipline decides the claim before its merits are reached.

Why it matters

The s.80AC bar is absolute and is the commonest way this deduction is lost — it operates on the date of the return, not on the merits, and s.80-IAC sits squarely under heading C of Chapter VI-A. Section 80A(5) adds a second, independent bar: no deduction under that heading is allowed at all unless the claim is made in the return of income. Beyond timing, three conditions do the work. The start-up must hold a certificate of eligible business from the Inter-Ministerial Board of Certification notified in the Official Gazette; without it there is no deduction however plainly the business qualifies, as Herald Global Ventures Private Limited v CCIT shows, where the Board refused the certificate because a director held majority shareholding in the group. Total turnover in the relevant previous year must not exceed one hundred crore rupees. And the entity must be a company or a limited liability partnership — a firm or a proprietorship is outside the definition. The three-out-of-ten structure is a planning choice and a trap: choose the wrong three years and the benefit is spent against low profits, but the Gujarat High Court has held that the availability of later years is not an answer to hardship caused now.

Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.

Not yet CA-verified. This entry was found through the sources listed under the Sources tab, and the summary reflects what those sources say. Nobody has yet read the full judgment and signed it off. Check the source before relying on it.

Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.

Related

Other authorities on the same sections.
Every authority on the provisions this decision turns on: all 93 on s.139(1) · all 16 on s.80-IA · all 11 on s.80AC