Section 80AC

Section 80AC — the law in short

What the courts have decided on section 80AC, in one screen. Read this first; open an entry when you need the facts, the reasoning and the source.

• Bharat Electronics Employees Co-op Credit Society v CCIT High CourtHelps taxpayer
  Our co-operative credit society filed its return late and lost the section 80P deduction under section 80AC. The Chief Commissioner has rejected our section 119(2)(b) condonation application for want of sufficient cause. Is that rejection sustainable?
  No, not on these facts. The Andhra Pradesh High Court set aside the Chief Commissioner's order refusing to condone the delay and directed that the return be treated as filed within time. The Court held that co-operative societies became liable to file returns only on the Finance Act, 2018 amendment, that a society run with minimal staff and unaware of the provisions is itself in genuine difficulty, and that the authorities must take a liberal approach towards co-operative societies in the teeth of CBDT Circular No. 13/2023. It did not decide the section 80P claim; that was left to be dealt with in assessment.
• Coromondel Cabeles P Ltd v ACIT High CourtCuts both ways
  The Department has taxed my housing project income as business profit. Can I claim the section 80-IB(10) deduction now, in appeal, when I never claimed it in my return?
  Not for years governed by section 80AC. The Madras High Court held that where section 80AC applies, the deduction cannot be allowed unless the return was filed by the due date and the claim was made in it. The assessee had made no claim under section 80-IB in its return, so for assessment years 2007-08 to 2011-12 the benefit was refused, section 80AC having been inserted by the Finance Act 2006 with effect from 1 April 2006. For assessment year 2006-07 the question was answered in the assessee's favour. The Court recorded a prima facie view that the requirement may be directory, but held it could say so only under Article 226 and not in a section 260A appeal.
• Kanyakaparameshwari Co-operative Society Ltd v CCIT High CourtHelps taxpayerNo later treatment found
  My co-operative society filed its return late and lost section 80P because of section 80AC. If the delay is condoned under section 119(2)(b), does the deduction come back?
  On this Karnataka view, yes. The Court held that section 80AC does not say in express terms that the deduction becomes inadmissible if the delay in filing the return is condoned, so an order under section 119(2)(b) condoning the delay clears the way for the claim. It adopted its earlier decision in Sullia Taluk Womens Multi Purpose Co-operative Society and read the Central Board's circular of 26 July 2023, which directs the authorities to admit and decide condonation applications from audited co-operative societies for assessment years 2018-19 to 2022-23 on the merits. The rejection of the society's application was quashed and the delay condoned, and the Court went on to quash the completed assessment as well and remit the claim for fresh consideration.
• Kassia Credit Co-operative Society v DCIT ITATHelps departmentJudgment not reachable
  My society filed its return only in response to a 148 notice. Can it still claim 80P?
  No. Section 80AC(ii) makes filing by the s.139(1) due date a condition precedent for deductions under Part C of Chapter VI-A, which includes s.80P, and a return filed pursuant to a s.148 notice does not cure the default.
• Shree Dhamel Seva Sahkari v ADIT (CPC) ITATCuts both waysNo later treatment found
  CPC denied my society's 80P in a 143(1) intimation because the return was late. Can it?
  Not outright. The Tribunal accepted the submission that a debatable issue cannot be adjusted under s.143(1)(a), and said that a co-operative society whose s.80P claim is valid and substantiated should not be denied it merely because the return was late - but it did not quash the intimations and did not decide the s.80AC(ii) question. It remitted all three appeals to the Assessing Officer to examine the claims, allowing them for statistical purposes, and expressly directed that the decision is confined to its own facts and is not to be treated as a precedent.
• ACIT v Monarch Innovative Technologies Pvt Ltd ITATHelps taxpayer
  I filed my return on time but only claimed the section 80-IC deduction in a revised return. Does section 80AC kill the claim, and can the officer reopen an assessment in which he already allowed it?
  No on both counts, on these facts. The Mumbai Tribunal held that section 80AC requires only that the return be furnished on or before the due date under section 139(1); it does not say the deduction must itself be claimed in that return, and words cannot be read into a taxing statute that the legislature has not used. A revised return under section 139(5) filed in time is an extension of the original return. The reopening was also bad: all the material, including the revised return, the revised tax audit report and Form 10CCB, was before the officer when he allowed the deduction after detailed discussion, so this was a change of opinion. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
• Statutory position — s.80-IAC: the start-up deduction, the incorporation cut-off, and the s.80AC bar on a late return CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both ways
  Until when must a start-up be incorporated to claim s.80-IAC, and what happens to the claim if the return is filed late?
  As the section currently reads, an eligible start-up must be incorporated on or after 1 April 2016 but before 1 April 2030 — the date was substituted for 2025 by Act No. 7 of 2025 with effect from 1 April 2025, which is the extension relied on here. The deduction is one hundred per cent of the profits of the eligible business for three consecutive assessment years, claimable at the assessee's option out of ten years beginning with the year of incorporation, and it is lost entirely if the return is filed after the due date under s.139(1), because s.80AC bars every deduction under the Chapter VI-A heading 'C.—Deductions in respect of certain incomes' in that event.
• Statutory position — section 80LA: a unit in an IFSC gets one hundred per cent for ten consecutive years out of fifteen, at its option CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both ways
  My client has set up a unit in GIFT City. What exactly is the section 80LA deduction, how long does it last, and what has to go with the return?
  Section 80LA(1A) allows a Unit of an International Financial Services Centre a deduction of one hundred per cent of the income referred to in section 80LA(2), for any ten consecutive assessment years, at the option of the assessee, out of fifteen years beginning with the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which the permission or registration was obtained. The permission or registration counted for that starting point is one under clause (a) of section 23(1) of the Banking Regulation Act 1949, or under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992, or under the International Financial Services Centres Authority Act 2019.
• Statutory position — s.80JJAA: thirty per cent of additional employee cost for three years, and every condition that defeats it CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both ways
  My client wants to claim s.80JJAA for new hires. What exactly is the deduction, and which conditions actually cause claims to fail?
  Section 80JJAA gives an assessee to whom s.44AB applies, whose gross total income includes profits and gains derived from business, a deduction of thirty per cent of the additional employee cost incurred in the course of that business in the previous year, for three assessment years including the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which the employment is provided. The conditions that defeat claims in practice are in the Explanation, not in the operative sub-section: an employee earning more than twenty-five thousand rupees a month is not an "additional employee", nor is one employed for less than two hundred and forty days in the previous year (one hundred and fifty days for a manufacturer of apparel, footwear or leather products), nor one who does not participate in a recognised provident fund, nor one whose entire Employees' Pension Scheme contribution is paid by the Government. And the additional employee cost is nil for an existing business if there is no increase in the total number of employees over the last day of the preceding year, or if the emoluments are paid otherwise than by account payee cheque, account payee bank draft, electronic clearing system through a bank account, or such other prescribed electronic mode.
• Statutory position — the Explanation to s.10AA(1): the SEZ deduction is capped at total income, and a late return kills it CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both ways
  My client has an SEZ unit in profit and other units in loss. Does the s.10AA deduction come off the unit's own profit before the other units' losses, or only after? And does a late return matter?
  The Explanation to s.10AA(1) now settles the arithmetic against the taxpayer at the outer limit: the deduction "shall be allowed from the total income of the assessee computed in accordance with the provisions of this Act, before giving effect to the provisions of this section and the deduction under this section shall not exceed such total income of the assessee". So whatever the unit-wise computation produces, the allowance cannot exceed the assessee's total income computed after every other provision of the Act — including the set-off provisions — has been applied. Separately, the proviso to s.10AA(1) denies the deduction outright to an assessee who does not furnish a return of income on or before the due date under s.139(1).
• Statutory position — section 80AC and section 115JC: a late return destroys the section 80LA claim, and AMT still bites at nine per cent CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both ways
  We missed the section 139(1) due date by a week and the IFSC unit's whole income is covered by section 80LA. Is the deduction still available, and does alternate minimum tax apply on top?
  On the first question, no. Section 80AC provides that for an assessment year commencing on or after 1 April 2018, where any deduction is admissible under any provision of Chapter VI-A under the heading 'C.—Deductions in respect of certain incomes', no such deduction shall be allowed unless the assessee furnishes a return of his income for that assessment year on or before the due date specified under section 139(1). Section 80LA sits in that Part of Chapter VI-A, so a return filed even a day late costs the whole deduction. On the second, alternate minimum tax under section 115JC does apply to a person other than a company, and section 115JC(2)(i) adds back deductions claimed under any section in that same Part C — but section 115JC(4)(i) substitutes nine per cent for eighteen and one-half per cent where the person is a unit located in an International Financial Services Centre deriving its income solely in convertible foreign exchange.

Listed strongest first: Supreme Court, then High Court, then Tribunal, then CBDT. Nothing here has yet been read in full by a chartered accountant — open an entry to see where it came from.