VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Income-tax Act 2025 › Chapter XVIII › Section 358
Chapter XVIIIwas s.249

Section 358 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 358 — Form of appeal and limitation. Successor to s.249 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 358 is in Chapter XVIII — Appeals Revisions and Alternate Dispute Resolutions, which runs from section 356 to section 389.

← Section 357  ·  Section 359 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) requires every appeal under Chapter XVIII to be in such form and verified in such manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) fixes the fee for an appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) by reference to the total income of the assessee as computed by the Assessing Officer in the case to which the appeal relates: Rs. 250 where that income is Rs. 100000 or less; Rs. 500 where it is more than Rs. 100000 but not more than Rs. 200000; Rs. 1000 where it is more than Rs. 200000; and Rs. 250 where the subject matter is not covered by clauses (a), (b) and (c).

Sub-section (3) requires the appeal to be presented within thirty days — from service of the notice of demand where it relates to an assessment or penalty, and otherwise from service of intimation of the order appealed against. Sub-section (4) excludes, for clause (a), the period from the making of an application under section 440(1) to the service of the order rejecting it, where that application is rejected, and sub-section (5) allows admission after the period on satisfaction of sufficient cause.

Sub-section (6) bars admission unless, at the time of filing, the assessee has paid the tax due on the income returned where a return has been filed, or an amount equal to the advance tax which was payable by him where no return has been filed. Sub-section (7) allows the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the Commissioner (Appeals), on an application by the appellant and for reasons recorded in writing, to exempt him from the operation of sub-section (6)(b).

Why it is there

An appeal has to be capable of being received and processed, so the Act fixes the form, a graduated fee and a short limitation period running from service rather than from the date of the order. Sub-section (6) exists because an appeal should not postpone tax the assessee has himself admitted or ought to have paid in advance; sub-sections (5) and (7) leave room for genuine cases.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Appeal feeRs. 250Where the total income of the assessee as computed by the Assessing Officer in the case to which the appeal relates is Rs. 100000 or lessSub-section (2)(a)
Appeal feeRs. 500Where that total income is more than Rs. 100000 but not more than Rs. 200000Sub-section (2)(b)
Appeal feeRs. 1000Where that total income is more than Rs. 200000Sub-section (2)(c)
Appeal fee where the subject matter is not income-relatedRs. 250Where the subject matter of an appeal is not covered under clauses (a), (b) and (c)Sub-section (2)(d)
Limitation for presenting an appealThirty daysFrom the date of service of the notice of demand where the appeal relates to any assessment or penalty; otherwise from the date intimation of the order is servedSub-section (3)(a) and (b)
Period excluded from the thirty daysFrom the date the section 440(1) application is made to the date the order rejecting it is servedOnly for sub-section (3)(a), and only where the application is rejectedSub-section (4)

What this means in practice

The fee slabs turn on the total income as computed by the Assessing Officer, not on the amount in dispute, so a small addition in a large assessment still attracts the Rs. 1000 fee. Limitation runs from service, not from the date the order bears, and the exclusion in sub-section (4) is available only where a section 440(1) application has been rejected and only for the demand-notice limb. The pre-deposit in sub-section (6) is a condition of admission tested at the time of filing, and the relaxation in sub-section (7) is confined to clause (b) — the no-return case — so where a return was filed the tax due on the returned income must be paid with no power to waive it. Delay beyond thirty days is not fatal but discretionary under sub-section (5).

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An assessee is served with a notice of demand after an assessment computing total income at Rs. 40 lakh, of which only a Rs. 3 lakh addition is disputed. The fee is Rs. 1000 under clause (c), because the slab looks at the total income computed by the Officer. The appeal must be presented within thirty days of service, and will not be admitted unless the tax due on the income returned has been paid — sub-section (7) cannot help, reaching only the no-return case. If presented on the fortieth day, it may still be admitted under sub-section (5) on sufficient cause.

Where you meet this section

This is the section you comply with when filing a first appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) — it fixes the form, the fee and the thirty days from service. You meet it adversely if the appeal is refused admission for non-payment under sub-section (6) or treated as time-barred.

The words themselves

The appeal shall be presented within thirty days,—
Section 358(3), Income-tax Act, 2025.
may, for the purposes of sub-section (6)(b) and on an application made by the appellant in this behalf, for reasons to be recorded in writing, exempt him from the operation of the provisions of that sub-section
Section 358(7), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Rules that serve this section

Rules of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 that work section 358. Where the rule’s own heading names the section we say so; the rest are marked on reading the rule, which is our derivation and not the department’s. A rule that serves the section silently and that we have missed will not appear here.

All of them are in the Rules 2026 index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 358. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.