VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Concepts › Paying the admitted tax, and getting a late appeal admitted

Paying the admitted tax, and getting a late appeal admitted

What must I pay before my appeal is admitted, and what happens if I file late?

The Income-tax Act, 1961 was repealed on 1 April 2026. It still governs income earned up to 31 March 2026, and every proceeding about those years however late — assessment, reassessment, rectification, penalty, revision and appeal alike. Income earned from 1 April 2026 is governed by the Income-tax Act, 2025. What changed, and which Act governs your year →

What must I pay before my appeal is admitted, and what happens if I file late?

Section 249(4) makes payment of the tax due on the returned income a condition for the admission of a first appeal - not a technicality but a bar the CIT(A) can and does apply. 'Tax' for this purpose does not include interest under sections 234A to 234C. Section 249(3) lets the CIT(A) admit a late appeal on sufficient cause, and the courts read that liberally.

This is an explainer, not a judgment. It states the law in our own words, which is exactly why it needs checking. Everything below was written from the sources listed at the foot of this page, and no chartered accountant has yet signed it off. Read the source before you rely on it in a reply or an appeal.

Section 249(4) provides that no appeal shall be admitted unless, at the time of filing, the assessee has paid the tax due on the income returned - clause (a) - or, where no return has been filed, an amount equal to the advance tax payable - clause (b). The proviso to clause (b) allows the Commissioner (Appeals) to exempt the appellant from that requirement for any good and sufficient reason to be recorded in writing, so the exemption must be asked for expressly and reasons must be sought on the record. Two limits matter. The Bombay High Court has held that the word 'tax' in section 249(4) is used in the sense of section 2(43) and does not take in interest defined in section 2(28A), so unpaid section 234A/B/C interest is not a ground to refuse admission. And the Supreme Court has held that section 249(4)(a), though a mandatory condition at the first-appeal stage, cannot be read into section 253(1)(b), so the payment does not have to be made again to appeal to the Tribunal. Where there is no admitted or undisputed tax at all - for instance, income below the taxable limit and no return filed - Tribunal benches have held there is nothing to pre-deposit. On delay, section 249(2) gives thirty days from service of the notice of demand and section 249(3) empowers the Commissioner (Appeals) to admit a later appeal on sufficient cause; the liberal approach in Collector, Land Acquisition v Mst. Katiji applies, and delay caused by counsel's default rather than the assessee's has been condoned. Practitioners go wrong by filing the appeal without the challan, by treating 249(4) as curable at the hearing, and by filing a condonation petition with no affidavit and no day-by-day explanation.

What to do

Authorities on these sections

Judgments in this library that turn on the same provisions.

Where this came from

Every page in this library links to what it was written from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.