VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Income-tax Act 2025 › Chapter IV › Section 22
Chapter IVwas s.24, s.25

Section 22 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 22 — Deductions from income from house property. Successor to s.24, s.25 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 22 is in Chapter IV — Computation of Total Income, which runs from section 13 to section 95.

← Section 21  ·  Section 23 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) gives the three deductions from income under the head "Income from house property": (a) a flat 30% of the annual value as determined under section 21; (b) interest payable on capital borrowed to acquire, construct, repair, renew or reconstruct the property; and (c) interest for the period before the tax year in which the property was acquired or constructed, allowed in five equal instalments beginning with that tax year and running through the four following tax years. Sub-section (2) caps the interest under (b) and (c) for property of the kind referred to in section 21(6) at Rs. 2,00,000, but only where acquisition or construction is completed within five years from the end of the tax year in which the capital was borrowed and the assessee furnishes a certificate from the lender; failing those conditions the cap drops to Rs. 30,000. Sub-section (3) requires the pre-period interest under (1)(c) to be reduced by anything already allowed as a deduction elsewhere in the Act, sub-section (4) prescribes what the certificate must state (including interest on any new loan taken to repay the original borrowing), and sub-section (5) caps the aggregate of all sub-section (2) deductions across all section 21(6) properties at Rs. 2,00,000. Sub-section (6) disallows interest payable outside India where tax has not been paid or deducted on it under Chapter XIX-B and there is no agent in India as per section 306.

Why it is there

The 30% allowance replaces any proof of repairs and collection costs with a fixed figure, and the interest limbs relieve the real cost of financing the property. The monetary caps and the completion and certificate conditions in sub-section (2) confine the larger interest relief to section 21(6) property acquired or built within a defined window and evidenced by the lender, and sub-section (6) stops interest leaving India untaxed while still being deducted.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Standard deduction from annual value30%Of the annual value as determined under section 21, not of rent received22(1)(a)
Pre-acquisition or pre-construction interestFive equal instalmentsFor interest payable for the period prior to the tax year of acquisition or construction; taken in that tax year and each of the four immediately succeeding tax years22(1)(c)
Cap on aggregate interest deduction under (1)(b) and (c)Rs. 2,00,000Only for property referred to in section 21(6), and only where acquisition or construction is completed within five years from the end of the tax year in which the capital was borrowed and a lender's certificate is furnished22(2)(a)
Completion window for the higher capFive yearsFrom the end of the tax year in which the capital was borrowed, not from the date of borrowing22(2)(a)(i)
Cap where the sub-section (2)(a) conditions are not metRs. 30,000In any other case22(2)(b)
Overall ceiling across propertiesRs. 2,00,000Aggregate of sub-section (2) deductions in respect of all properties of the nature referred to in section 21(6)22(5)

What this means in practice

The 30% comes off automatically once annual value is fixed under section 21; nothing has to be spent or proved to claim it. To get the Rs. 2,00,000 interest figure on a section 21(6) property you need both the five-year completion and a certificate from the person to whom the interest is payable stating the interest on the borrowed capital and on any refinancing loan — without them the deduction collapses to Rs. 30,000. Because sub-section (5) applies the Rs. 2,00,000 to the aggregate across such properties, owning more than one does not multiply the limit. Interest remitted abroad has to have been subjected to deduction or payment of tax under Chapter XIX-B, or there must be an agent in India under section 306, or it is simply not allowed.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An individual lets a house whose annual value under section 21 is Rs. 6,00,000; clause (1)(a) hands him Rs. 1,80,000 — 30% of that annual value — whether or not he spent a rupee on repairs. He also holds a property of the kind referred to in section 21(6) on which interest of Rs. 2,60,000 is payable, but construction was completed only in the sixth year after the end of the tax year in which the capital was borrowed, so the condition in sub-section (2)(a)(i) fails and the ceiling collapses from Rs. 2,00,000 to the Rs. 30,000 in clause (b). Interest of Rs. 5,00,000 for the years before construction comes in five equal instalments of Rs. 1,00,000 under clause (1)(c), and owning a second such property would not double the Rs. 2,00,000 — sub-section (5) makes it an aggregate ceiling across all section 21(6) properties.

Where you meet this section

In the return, in the computation of income under the head “Income from house property”, and in the intimation or assessment order that restricts the interest claim. The section names no form and no authority, but it does name a document you must hold: the certificate from the person to whom the interest is payable, whose contents sub-section (4) fixes.

The words themselves

The aggregate of the amounts of deduction under sub-section (2) in respect of properties of the nature referred to in section 21(6) shall not exceed Rs. 200000.
Section 22(5), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See every circular and notification on this section, or the circulars index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See every circular and notification on this section, or the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 22. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

Work it out

Free calculators on VittSphere ONE for the very provision this page is about. They open in the same window.
What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.