VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Income-tax Act 2025 › Chapter XII › Section 188
Chapter XIIwas s.269T

Section 188 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 188 — Mode of repayment of certain loans or deposits or specified advances. Successor to s.269T of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 188 is in Chapter XII — Mode of Payment in Certain Cases etc., which runs from section 185 to section 189.

← Section 187  ·  Section 189 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) bars a branch of a banking company or co-operative bank, any other company or co-operative society, and any firm or other person from repaying a loan or deposit made with it, or a specified advance received by it, otherwise than by account payee cheque, account payee bank draft in the name of the person who made the loan or deposit or paid the advance, electronic clearing system through a bank account, or another prescribed electronic mode — the bar biting where the amount being repaid, or the aggregate of loans and deposits held by that person on the date of repayment, or the aggregate of specified advances received from him, together with any interest payable, is Rs. 20,000 or more. Sub-section (2) additionally permits a bank or co-operative bank branch to repay by crediting the loan or deposit to the payee's savings or current account with that branch. Sub-section (3) exempts repayments of amounts taken from Government, banking companies, post office savings banks, co-operative banks, statutory corporations, Government companies and notified institutions. Sub-section (4) raises the Rs. 20,000 figure to Rs. 2,00,000 for a deposit repaid to a member by, or a loan repaid by a member to, a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank, and sub-section (5) defines "loan or deposit".

Why it is there

It closes the cash route on the repayment side, so that money returned on loans, deposits and advances leaves a banking trail and cannot be used to unwind undocumented cash transactions. The exemptions and the higher rural threshold keep the rule off Government and institutional dealings and off small co-operative credit society repayments.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Threshold at which the prescribed modes become compulsoryRs. 20,000Tested on the amount repaid, or the aggregate loans and deposits held by that person (individually or jointly) on the date of repayment, or the aggregate specified advances received from him, in each case together with interest payable188(1)(A) to (C)
Substituted threshold for co-operative credit society dealingsRs. 2,00,000Where the deposit is repaid to a member by, or the loan is repaid by a member to, a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank188(4)

What this means in practice

Before repaying, add up the position rather than looking at the single payment: the Rs. 20,000 test is met if the aggregate of that person's loans and deposits with you on the date of repayment, plus interest, reaches the figure, even where you are paying back much less. A bank draft must be account payee and drawn in the name of the person who made the loan or deposit or paid the advance, so a draft in a third party's name breaches the section however genuine the arrangement. Banks and co-operative banks have the extra route of crediting the depositor's own savings or current account at the branch. If either side of the repayment is a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank dealing with its member, the threshold is Rs. 2,00,000.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A firm holds two deposits from the same person, Rs. 15,000 and Rs. 9,000, with Rs. 1,200 of interest payable, and repays Rs. 15,000 in cash. The single payment looks to be under the line, but clause (B) tests the aggregate of the loans and deposits held by that person on the date of repayment together with interest — Rs. 25,200 — so the Rs. 20,000 threshold is crossed and the cash repayment breaches the section; it had to go by account payee cheque, account payee bank draft in the name of the person who made the deposit, electronic clearing system through a bank account, or another prescribed electronic mode. A draft for the same sum drawn in the name of that person's son would fail as well, however genuine the arrangement. Had the payer been a primary agricultural credit society repaying a deposit to its member, sub-section (4) would have read Rs. 2,00,000 for Rs. 20,000 and the cash repayment would have been unobjectionable.

Where you meet this section

You meet it at the moment of repayment, in the instrument the payer is forced to choose, and afterwards in penalty proceedings and the assessment where a cash repayment is put to the payer. The section names no form; it names the classes of payer — a branch of a banking company or co-operative bank, any other company or co-operative society, a firm or other person — and the exempt counterparties in sub-section (3), including Government, post office savings banks, statutory corporations, Government companies and notified institutions.

The words themselves

No branch of a banking company or co-operative bank and no other company or co-operative society and no firm or other person shall repay— (a) any loan or deposit made with it; or (b) any specified advance received by it, except through— (i) an account payee cheque
Section 188(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Rules that serve this section

Rules of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 that work section 188. Where the rule’s own heading names the section we say so; the rest are marked on reading the rule, which is our derivation and not the department’s. A rule that serves the section silently and that we have missed will not appear here.

All of them are in the Rules 2026 index.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 188. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.