VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCirculars1987 › Circular No. 479
CBDT circular 16 January 1987

Circular No. 479

1275. Whether the payment in cash of periodical interest amount alone exceeding Rs. 10,000 would attract the provisions of sec­tion 269T

What this is

Circular No. 479 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 16 January 1987. Its subject is 1275. Whether the payment in cash of periodical interest amount alone exceeding Rs. 10,000 would attract the provisions of sec­tion 269T.

This is a clarification. The Board is stating how it reads a provision. That reading binds the department; it does not bind a court, and where the section says otherwise the section wins.

What it does

Holds that periodical interest paid in cash is caught by section 269T. That section forbids a company, co-operative society or firm from repaying a deposit otherwise than by an account payee cheque or account payee bank draft where the deposit, or the deposit together with interest, is Rs. 10,000 or more. On the Indian Banks' Association's question whether a cash payment of periodical interest alone exceeding Rs. 10,000 attracts the section, the Board, advised by the Ministry of Law, says it does: interest of Rs. 10,000 or more must be paid in the manner section 269T prescribes, because interest accrued on the deposit and credited to the account, periodically or otherwise, partakes of the character of a deposit and becomes a deposit itself. Where the repayment of principal together with interest comes to Rs. 10,000 or more, the Board says there was never any doubt that the section applies.

Why it was issued

The Indian Banks' Association had asked whether a cash payment of interest by itself, without any repayment of principal, was within the section.

Who it reaches

The provisions it speaks to

Left, the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the instrument itself names it. Right, the section of the Income-tax Act, 2025 that the department’s own concordance maps it to — which is where the same ground is now covered.
Under the 1961 ActNow
s.269Ts.2, s.188, s.189

The instrument, as the Board published it

The words below are the department’s own, reproduced from its published text. Where the department’s copy carried a publisher’s notes after the instrument, those are not reproduced.

1275. Whether the payment in cash of periodical interest amount alone exceeding Rs. 10,000 would attract the provisions of sec­tion 269T
1. Indian Banks’ Association had sought a clarification as to whether the payment in cash of periodical interest amount along exceeding Rs. 10,000 would attract the provisions of section 269T. This section provides that no company, co-operative society or firm shall repay any deposit otherwise than by an account payee cheque or account payee bank draft where the amount of deposit or the aggregate of the amount of deposit together with any interest is Rs. 10,000 or more.
2. The matter has been examined in consultation with the Ministry of Law. The Board has been advised that the payment of interest of Rs. 10,000 or more, will have to be made in the manner provid­ed in section 269T. So far as the repayment of deposit together with any interest is concerned, there is no room for doubt. If the amount of repayment after including the interest is Rs. 10,000 or more, the provisions of section 269T would be attract­ed. This is because the interest accrued on the deposit and credited to the account periodically or otherwise partakes of the character of a deposit and as such becomes a deposit itself.
Circular: No. 479 [F. No. 225/47/86-IT(A.II)], dated 16-1-1987.

What to watch

Where you meet it

In a penalty proceeding for contravention of section 269T where interest on a deposit was paid over the counter in cash.

On the same provision

Other instruments in this library that name the same provision of the 1961 Act. They are not necessarily still operative, and a later one may have replaced an earlier one without saying so.

← Circular No. 480  ·  Circular No. 478 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.