VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Income-tax Rules 2026 › Rule 305
Rules 2026

Rule 305 of the Income-tax Rules, 2026

Rule 305 — Ordinary annual contributions.

Where this rule sits

← Rule 304  ·  Rule 306 →

What this rule does

The rule caps the employer's yearly contribution to a fund for each employee. It shall not exceed 27% of the employee's salary for each year, as reduced by any contributions the employer made to a provident fund for the same employee during that year, whether recognised or not.

Why it is there

Approval of a fund carries tax consequences for the employer's contribution, so the amount that may be put in for each employee has to be limited, and limited on a combined basis. The reduction for provident fund contributions stops the same salary supporting a full contribution to both a provident fund and this fund, and it counts unrecognised provident funds too.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Ceiling on the employer's yearly contribution for each employeeShall not exceed 27% of their salary for each yearReduced by any contributions the employer made to a provident fund for the same employee during that year, whether recognised or not. It is an upper limit on what may be contributed, not a rate at which contribution is requiredRule 305

What this means in practice

27% is a ceiling, not the contribution. Nothing in the rule requires an employer to contribute 27% or any other proportion; it says only that the yearly contribution shall not exceed that figure. The ceiling is also net: the 27% of salary is reduced by whatever the employer contributed to a provident fund for the same employee during that year, and the rule expressly counts a provident fund whether recognised or not, so an unrecognised fund does not sit outside the computation. The test is per employee and per year, so a shortfall in one year cannot be carried into the next.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the requirement biting, not taken from any real matter.

An employee's salary for the year is Rs. 12,00,000, so 27% is Rs. 3,24,000. The employer has already contributed Rs. 1,44,000 to a provident fund for the same employee that year. The ceiling on the employer's contribution to the fund for that employee is the balance, Rs. 1,80,000 — and the employer may contribute less, since the rule sets a limit and not an amount.

Where you meet this rule

You meet it when an employer's annual contribution for an employee is tested against the limit, in the fund's own records and in any question about the treatment of the contribution.

The words themselves

The yearly contribution of the employer to a fund for each employee shall not exceed 27% of their salary for each year as reduced by any contributions the employer made to a provident fund for the same employee during that year, whether recognised or not.
Rule 305, Income-tax Rules, 2026.

What people get wrong

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the rule. Everything above was written from the rule’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here. A rule is subordinate legislation: it prescribes the method, the form or the period, and it cannot enlarge the charge the section imposes. Where a figure matters, read the sub-rule it comes from.