VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Rules 2026 › Rule 304
Rules 2026

Rule 304 of the Income-tax Rules, 2026

Rule 304 — Admission of directors to a fund.

Where this rule sits

← Rule 303  ·  Rule 305 →

What this rule does

The rule limits which directors may take benefits from a fund. A director of a company, as defined in section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013, may only receive benefits from the fund if he is a whole-time bona fide employee of the company and does not beneficially own shares in the company carrying more than 5% of the total voting power.

Why it is there

A fund of this kind exists for employees, and a director sits on both sides of the arrangement — he may be an employee in substance or only in name, and he may control the company that funds it. The rule keeps the fund to its purpose with two tests that can be checked from the company's own records: whole-time bona fide employment, and a shareholding below the stated proportion of voting power.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Beneficial shareholding above which a director may not receive benefitsShares carrying more than 5% of the total voting powerBeneficially owned by the director in the companyRule 304

What this means in practice

Both conditions must hold at once: whole-time bona fide employment and a beneficial shareholding not carrying more than 5% of the total voting power. The test is on voting power, not on the number or face value of shares, so shares carrying enhanced or restricted voting rights are measured by what they can vote rather than by what they cost. It is also a beneficial ownership test, so shares held in another name for the director's benefit count, and shares held by him for someone else's do not. "Whole-time bona fide employee" excludes a director whose employment is nominal, however the appointment is described. "Director" is not defined here on its own terms but by section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the requirement biting, not taken from any real matter.

A director who works full time in the company and beneficially owns shares carrying 4% of the total voting power may receive benefits from the fund. A colleague on the same board who is equally a whole-time employee but beneficially holds shares carrying 8% of the voting power may not, and neither may a non-executive director holding nothing at all, because he is not a whole-time bona fide employee.

Where you meet this rule

You meet it when a director is admitted to the fund or a benefit is paid out to him, where the trustees have to satisfy themselves on his employment and his beneficial shareholding.

The words themselves

A director of a company, as defined in section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), may only receive benefits from the fund, if he is a whole-time bona fide employee of the company and does not beneficially own shares in the company carrying more than 5% of the total voting power.
Rule 304, Income-tax Rules, 2026.

What people get wrong

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the rule. Everything above was written from the rule’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here. A rule is subordinate legislation: it prescribes the method, the form or the period, and it cannot enlarge the charge the section imposes. Where a figure matters, read the sub-rule it comes from.