Amendment of the Income-tax Rules under section 120 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
Notification No. 261 was published on 15 December 2005. Its subject is Amendment of the Income-tax Rules under section 120 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
This amends the Income-tax Rules. What it changes is the Rules, not the Act — and a rule can never take away what the section gives.
The Central Board of Direct Taxes, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 120 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, amends the jurisdiction notification S.O. 994(E) dated 9th September, 2004, by substituting the whole Schedule to it. The substituted Schedule sets out, against each serial number, the designation of the Transfer Pricing Officer, his headquarters, the territorial area and the persons or class of persons over whom he is to exercise jurisdiction. The Delhi Transfer Pricing Officers are given the areas within the territorial limits of Delhi, Rajasthan, Punjab, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Uttar Pradesh, Uttaranchal and Himachal Pradesh; the Mumbai officers, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Daman and Diu; the Bangalore officer, Karnataka and Goa; the Hyderabad officer, Andhra Pradesh; the Chennai officers, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Pondicherry, Lakshadweep and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands; and the Kolkata officers, Kolkata, the North East Region, Orissa, Jharkhand, Bihar and Chhattisgarh. In each case the persons covered are those assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of an Assessing Officer having his office in the territorial area in column (4).
NOTIFICATION NO. 261/2005, DATED 15-12-2005
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 120 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), (Central Board of Direct Taxes), number S.O. 994(E) dated the 9th September, 2004, namely:-
In the said notification, for the Schedule, the following Schedule shall be substituted, namely:-
SCHEDULE
Serial Number
Designation of Income-tax Authorities
Head Quarter
Territorial Area
Persons or Class of persons
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
1.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing Officer-I), Delhi
Delhi
Areas lying within the territorial limits of states of Delhi, Rajasthan, Punjab, Haryana, Jammu & Kashmir, Uttar Pradesh, Uttaranchal and Himachal Pradesh.
Persons or class of persons who are assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of Assessing Officer having their office in the territorial area indicated in Column 4.
2.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing Officer-II), Delhi
Delhi
Areas lying within the territorial limits of states of Delhi, Rajasthan, Punjab, Haryana, Jammu & Kashmir, Uttar Pradesh, Uttaranchal and Himachal Pradesh.
Persons or class of persons who are assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of Assessing Officer having their office in the territorial area indicated in Column 4.
3.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing Officer-I), Mumbai
Mumbai
Areas lying within the territorial limits of states of Maharashtra, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Daman & Diu.
Persons or class of persons who are assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of Assessing Officer having their office in the territorial area indicated in Column 4.
4.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing Officer-II), Mumbai
Mumbai
Areas lying within the territorial limits of states of Maharashtra, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Daman & Diu.
Persons or class of persons who are assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of Assessing Officer having their office in the territorial area indicated in Column 4.
5.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing Officer-III), Mumbai
Mumbai
Areas lying within the territorial limits of states of Maharashtra, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Daman & Diu.
Persons or class of persons who are assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of Assessing Officer having their office in the territorial area indicated in Column 4.
6.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing Officer-I), Bangalore
Bangalore
Areas lying within the territorial limits of states of Karnataka and Goa.
Persons or class of persons who are assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of Assessing Officer having their office in the territorial area indicated in Column 4.
7.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing Officer), Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Areas lying within the territorial limits of states of Andhra Pradesh.
Persons or class of persons who are assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of Assessing Officer having their office in the territorial area indicated in Column 4.
8.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing Officer-I), Chennai
Chennai
Areas lying within the territorial limits of states of Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Pondicherry, Lakshwadweep, Andaman & Niccobar Islands.
Persons or class of persons who are assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of Assessing Officer having their office in the territorial area indicated in Column 4.
9.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing Officer-II), Chennai
Chennai
Areas lying within the territorial limits of states of Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Pondicherry, Lakshwadweep, Andaman & Niccobar Islands.
Persons or class of persons who are assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of Assessing Officer having their office in the territorial area indicated in Column 4.
10.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing Officer-I), Kolkata
Kolkata
Areas lying within the territorial limits of states of Kolkata, North East Region, Orissa, Jharkhand, Bihar and Chhattisgarh.
Persons or class of persons who are assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of Assessing Officer having their office in the territorial area indicated in Column 4.
11.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing Officer-II), Kolkata
Kolkata
Areas lying within the territorial limits of states of Kolkata, North East Region, Orissa, Jharkhand, Bihar and Chhattisgarh.
Persons or class of persons who are assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of Assessing Officer having their office in the territorial area indicated in Column 4.
12.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing Officer-III), Delhi
Delhi
Areas lying within the territorial limits of states of Delhi, Rajasthan, Punjab, Haryana, Jammu & Kashmir, Uttar Pradesh, Uttaranchal and Himachal Pradesh.
Persons or class of persons who are assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of Assessing Officer having their office in the territorial area indicated in Column 4.
13.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing Officer-IV), Mumbai
Mumbai
Areas lying within the territorial limits of states of Maharashtra, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Daman & Diu.
Persons or class of persons who are assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of Assessing Officer having their office in the territorial area indicated in Column 4.
14.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing Officer-II), Bangalore
Bangalore
Areas lying within the territorial limits of states of Karnataka and Goa.
Persons or class of persons who are assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of Assessing Officer having their office in the territorial area indicated in Column 4.
15.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing Officer-V), Mumbai
Mumbai
Areas lying within the territorial limits of states of Maharashtra, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Daman & Diu.
Persons or class of persons who are assessed or assessable within the jurisdiction of Assessing Officer having their office in the territorial area indicated in Column 4.
Note:- The Central Board of Direct Taxes empowers the concerned Directors of Income-tax (Transfer Pricing) to distribute the work amongst the Transfer Pricing Officers working under them while exercising their powers and performing their functions.
F.No.187/11/2005-ITA-I
In a reference made to a Transfer Pricing Officer for determination of the arm's length price, and in an objection that the officer who passed the order lacked jurisdiction over the case.
Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.