VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawConcepts › Which clock runs: s.153 limitation against the s.144C timeline

Which clock runs: s.153 limitation against the s.144C timeline

When an assessment goes through the DRP, does the nine-month Panel period run inside the s.153 limitation or on top of it?

When an assessment goes through the DRP, does the nine-month Panel period run inside the s.153 limitation or on top of it?

Section 153 fixes the outer date for completing an assessment, while s.144C prescribes its own sequence of periods for the draft order, objections, Panel directions and the final order. Whether the s.144C periods run inside or beyond the s.153 date is the single largest limitation question in transfer pricing assessments, and the Supreme Court split on it in August 2025 and referred it to a larger bench.

This is an explainer, not a judgment. It states the law in our own words, which is exactly why it needs checking. Everything below was written from the sources listed at the foot of this page, and no chartered accountant has yet signed it off. Read the source before you rely on it in a reply or an appeal.

Under s.153 an assessment must ordinarily be completed within twelve months from the end of the assessment year, extended to twenty-four months where a reference is made to the Transfer Pricing Officer, with a separate period for assessments made afresh after a Tribunal order. The s.144C route adds a draft order, thirty days for objections, up to nine months for the Panel to issue directions and one month for the final order, so roughly eleven further months. The Madras High Court in CIT v Roca Bathroom Products and the Bombay High Court in Shelf Drilling held s.153 is not excluded by s.144C: DRP proceedings remain circumscribed by the limits of time, and s.144C(13) works only to compel a prompt final order. Tribunal benches had earlier taken the opposite view, treating s.144C as a self-contained scheme. On 8 August 2025 a two-judge bench in ACIT v Shelf Drilling Ron Tappmeyer (2025 INSC 946) divided, one judge holding s.153 governs only up to the draft order and the other holding the whole s.144C process must finish inside it; the matter went to the Chief Justice for a larger bench. The compression problem is real: where the TPO order comes shortly before the s.153 date, the nine-month Panel period becomes impossible to use.

What to do

Authorities on these sections

Judgments in this library that turn on the same provisions.

Where this came from

Every page in this library links to what it was written from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.