VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCirculars1993 › Circular No. 649
CBDT circular 31 March 1993

Circular No. 649

Section 44C l Head Office Expenditure in Case of Non-residents

What this is

Circular No. 649 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 31 March 1993. Its subject is Section 44C l Head Office Expenditure in Case of Non-residents.

What it does

Separates technical fees remitted by an Indian branch to its non-resident head office from head office expenditure restricted by section 44C. Section 44C limits the deduction for head office expenditure, which it defines as executive and general administrative expenditure incurred outside India. Technical fees not falling within that definition are deductible without limit in computing the branch's business profits. The fees in the head office's hands are taxed under the double taxation avoidance agreement read with the Act, on a gross or net basis according to the treaty, and where there is no treaty with the country concerned, under section 115A read with section 44D. The same treatment applies where the technical services are provided by a third party and the branch pays the head office by way of reimbursement, or pays the third party through the head office. Because such expenditure is allowed in full, the Assessing Officer must scrutinise the claim carefully, first verifying that the services were genuinely technical, and must allow it subject to section 40(a)(i) so that tax on the payment is not lost; the branch must deduct at source under section 195.

Why it was issued

The Board had to settle how technical fees remitted by an Indian branch to its head office for technical services rendered by the head office are to be treated, given the restriction in section 44C.

Who it reaches

The provisions it speaks to

Left, the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the instrument itself names it. Right, the section of the Income-tax Act, 2025 that the department’s own concordance maps it to — which is where the same ground is now covered.
Under the 1961 ActNow
s.40s.35, s.66
s.44Cs.60
s.44Dno counterpart recorded
s.115As.2, s.207
s.195s.393, s.395, s.397, s.400

The instrument, as the Board published it

The words below are the department’s own, reproduced from its published text. Where the department’s copy carried a publisher’s notes after the instrument, those are not reproduced.

SECTION 44C l HEAD OFFICE EXPENDITURE IN CASE OF NON-RESIDENTS
417. Treatment of technical expenses when being remitted to head office of a non-resident enterprise by its branch office in India
1. Section 44C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, provides for deduction of Head Office expenditure in the case of non-residents. It defines "head office expenditure" to mean executive and general administrative expenditure incurred by the assessee outside India, including certain specified expenditure. The Board had occasion to examine the treatment to be given to technical fees being remitted to the head office of a non-resident enterprise by its Indian branch office for certain technical services rendered by the head office.
2. Technical fees that are not covered under head office executive and general administrative expenditure specified in section 44C of the Income-tax Act are to be allowed deduction without any limit while computing the business profit of the branch office - permanent establishment - in India. However, the technical fees received by the head office will be taxable in accordance with the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement read with Income-tax Act. In other words, if there is a tax treaty with the concerned country which supplies technical services to the permanent establishment in India then the payment towards the technical fees will be taxable either on the gross or on the net basis depending on the agreement. On the other hand, if the fees are paid to a resident of a country with which there is no tax treaty then the payment will be taxable in accordance with the provisions of section 115A, read with section 44D of the Income-tax Act.
3. The above position will hold good when the technical services are provided by a third party and the payment is made by the permanent establishment in India to the head office directly by way of reimbursement or through the Head Office to the third party in respect of such services. In such circumstances, the rate of taxation will be as prescribed in the relevant tax treaty or if there is no tax treaty then in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act.
4. In view of the fact that Head Office technical expenses will have to be allowed in full, it is necessary for the Assessing Officer to carefully scrutinise any claim of Head Office technical expenditure while completing the assessment of assessee making such payments. The first aspect to be borne in mind is to verify the genuineness of the technical nature of the services rendered before allowing them as head office technical expenditure. The second aspect to be taken into account is that when such deductions are claimed, the amount so claimed should be allowed subject to the provisions of section 40(a)( i) of the Income-tax Act so that the collection of taxes on such payments is not lost sight of.
5. The branch - permanent establishment - should ensure tax deduction at source in such cases in accordance with the provisions of section 195 of the Income-tax Act.

Circular : No. 649, dated 31-3-1993.

What to watch

Where you meet it

In the assessment of a foreign bank or company's Indian branch where head office charges are disallowed in part under section 44C or wholly under section 40(a)(i).

On the same provision

Other instruments in this library that name the same provision of the 1961 Act. They are not necessarily still operative, and a later one may have replaced an earlier one without saying so.

← Circular No. 650  ·  Circular No. 648 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.