VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCirculars1989 › Circular No. 530
CBDT circular 6 March 1989

Circular No. 530

Whether Assessing Officer can exercise discretion under section 220(6) to treat assessee as not being in default in respect of amounts disputed in first appeal pending before Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)/Commissioner (Appeals)

What this is

Circular No. 530 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 6 March 1989. Its subject is Whether Assessing Officer can exercise discretion under section 220(6) to treat assessee as not being in default in respect of amounts disputed in first appeal pending before Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)/Commissioner (Appeals).

What it does

Directs Assessing Officers to grant stay under section 220(6) in two named situations. Where an appeal under section 246 is pending before the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) or the Commissioner (Appeals), the officer is on an application by the assessee to exercise his discretion, subject to such conditions as he thinks fit, and treat the assessee as not in default where the disputed demand arises from an interpretation of law on which there are conflicting High Court decisions, or on which the jurisdictional High Court has taken a contrary view that the Department has not accepted, or where the issue has already been decided in the assessee's favour by an appellate authority or court in his own case. The protection extends only to the amount attributable to those disputed points, and the officer ceases to be bound if the assessee does not co-operate in the early disposal of the appeal or a later pronouncement of a higher authority or court alters the position. In all other cases the officer is to weigh all relevant factors and pass a speaking order, and paragraph 4 as originally framed says the assessee's financial capacity to pay is not relevant.

Why it was issued

The Board considered it necessary and expedient, for the proper and efficient management of revenue collection, to lay down when the section 220(6) discretion should be exercised in the assessee's favour.

Who it reaches

The provisions it speaks to

Left, the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the instrument itself names it. Right, the section of the Income-tax Act, 2025 that the department’s own concordance maps it to — which is where the same ground is now covered.
Under the 1961 ActNow
s.220s.411

The instrument, as the Board published it

The words below are the department’s own, reproduced from its published text. Where the department’s copy carried a publisher’s notes after the instrument, those are not reproduced.

Whether Assessing Officer can exercise discretion under section 220(6) to treat assessee as not being in default in respect of amounts disputed in first appeal pending before Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)/Commissioner (Appeals)

1. Under section 220(6) of the I.T. Act, 1961 where an assessee has presented an appeal u/s 246 of the Act before the Deputy Commis­sioner (Appeals) or the Commissioner (Appeals), the Assessing Officer may, in his discretion, and subject to such conditions as he may think fit to impose in the circumstances of the case, treat the assessee as not being in default in respect of the amount in dispute in the appeal, even though the time for payment has expired, as long as such appeal remains undisposed of.
2. Having regard to the proper and efficient management of the work of collection of revenue, the Board has considered it neces­sary and expedient to order that on an application being filed by the assessee in this behalf, the Assessing Officer will exercise his discretion u/s 220(6) of the Act (subject to such conditions as he may think fit to impose) so as to treat the assessee as not being in default in respect of the amount in dispute in the appeal in the following situations :
(i) the demand in dispute has arisen because the Assessing Officer had adopted an interpretation of law in respect of which, there exist conflicting decisions of one or more High Courts or, the High Court of jurisdiction has adopted a contrary interpreta­tion but the Department has not accepted that judgment, or
(ii) the demand in dispute relates to issue that have been decided in favour of the assessee in an earlier order by an appellate authority or Court in assessee’s own case.
3. It is clarified that in the situations mentioned in para 2 above, the assessee will be treated as not in default only in respect of the amount attributable to such disputed points. Further, where it is subsequently found that the assessee has not co-operated in the early disposal of appeal or where a subsequent pronouncement by a higher appellate authority or Court alters the situation referred to in para 2 about, the Assessing officer will no longer be bound by the instructions and will excercise his disertion independently.
4. In respect of other cases, not covered by para 2 above, the Assessing Officer will take into account all the relevant factors and communicate his decision to the assessee in the form of a speaking order. While exercising discrtion under the provision, the financial capacity of the assessee to pay demand will not be relevant.
Circular : No. 530, dated 6-3-1989.

What to watch

Where you meet it

In an application for stay of demand after an assessment order, and in the order under section 220(6) that grants or refuses it.

On the same provision

Other instruments in this library that name the same provision of the 1961 Act. They are not necessarily still operative, and a later one may have replaced an earlier one without saying so.

← Circular No. 532  ·  Circular No. 529 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.