Whether Assessing Officer can exercise discretion under section 220(6) to treat assessee as not being in default in respect of amounts disputed in first appeal pending before Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)/Commissioner (Appeals)
Circular No. 589 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 16 January 1991. Its subject is Whether Assessing Officer can exercise discretion under section 220(6) to treat assessee as not being in default in respect of amounts disputed in first appeal pending before Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)/Commissioner (Appeals).
Rewrites paragraph 4 of Circular No. 530, dated 6th March, 1989 on the Assessing Officer's discretion under section 220(6) to treat an assessee as not in default while a first appeal is pending. The old paragraph 4 told the Assessing Officer, in cases outside the two situations in paragraph 2, to take all relevant factors into account and pass a speaking order, but expressly said that the assessee's financial capacity to pay the demand was not relevant. The substituted paragraph drops that exclusion: the Assessing Officer is to consider all relevant factors having a bearing on the demand raised and communicate his decision by a speaking order.
Representations were received that shutting out the assessee's financial capacity from the factors relevant to a stay under section 220(6) worked against assessees who are not financially sound.
| Under the 1961 Act | Now |
|---|---|
| s.220 | s.411 |
Whether Assessing Officer can exercise discretion under section 220(6) to treat assessee as not being in default in respect of amounts disputed in first appeal pending before Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)/Commissioner (Appeals)
1. Reference is invited to Board’s Circular No. 530 [F. No. 404/82/88-ITCC], dated March 6, 1989 regarding the above-mentioned subject.
2. According to paragraph 2 of the said Circular, the Assessing Officer is, in the two situations referred to in that paragraph, bound to treat the assessee as not in default in respect of the amount in dispute in appeal. In respect of other cases, the Circular stated in paragraph 4—
"In respect of other cases, not covered by para 2 above, Assessing Officer will take into account all the relevant factors and communicate his decision to the assessee in the form of a speaking order. While exercising discretion under this provision, the financial capacity of the assessee to pay the demand will not be relevant."
3. Representations have been received by the Board that the exclusion of financial capacity of the assessee to pay the demand, from the factors relevant for exercise of Assessing Officer’s discretion under section 220(6) of the Income-tax Act, is prejudicial to those assessees who are not financially sound.
4. The matter has been reconsidered by the Board. It has been decided to substitute paragraph 4 of Circular No. 530 by the following paragraph :
"In respect of other cases not covered by paragraph 2 above, the Assessing Officer, while considering the situation for treating the assessees to be not in default, would consider all relevant factors having a bearing on the demand raised and communicate his decision to the assessee in the form of a speaking order."
Circular : No. 589, dated 16-1-1991.
In an application for stay of demand under section 220(6) after an assessment order, and in the speaking order or its refusal that follows.
Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.