VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCBDT Circulars & Instructions › Statutory position — s.286(7) with Rule 10DB(6): the country-by-country threshold is six thousand four hundred crore rupees, and it is tested against the consolidated group revenue of the accounting year PRECEDING the reporting accounting year
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both waysValidity unconfirmeds.286s.286(7)s.286(9)s.271GBs.92DRule 10DBRule 10DARule 26

Statutory position — s.286(7) with Rule 10DB(6): the country-by-country threshold is six thousand four hundred crore rupees, and it is tested against the consolidated group revenue of the accounting year PRECEDING the reporting accounting year

Our group's consolidated revenue crossed the country-by-country threshold this year but was below it last year. Do we have to file for this year?

Our group's consolidated revenue crossed the country-by-country threshold this year but was below it last year. Do we have to file for this year?

No — and the reason is the year the test looks at. Section 286(7) provides that the section does not apply to an international group for an accounting year "if the total consolidated group revenue, as reflected in the consolidated financial statement for the accounting year preceding such accounting year does not exceed the amount, as may be prescribed". The prescribed amount is in Rule 10DB(6), which fixes it at six thousand four hundred crore rupees. So the test is applied to the consolidated group revenue of the year BEFORE the reporting accounting year, not to the reporting accounting year's own revenue. A group whose consolidated revenue was below Rs 6,400 crore in the preceding accounting year is outside s.286 for the year in question however large its revenue becomes in that year; a group that was above it in the preceding year is inside s.286 for the year in question even if its revenue collapses. Rule 10DB(7) supplies the conversion rule where the consolidated revenue is in a foreign currency: the telegraphic transfer buying rate on the last day of the accounting year preceding the accounting year.

Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) on 2021-04-01, reported as Section 286(7) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, transcribed from incometaxindia.gov.in/w/section-286-60 (Year: 2022), incometaxindia.gov.in/w/section-286-62 (Year: 2024 (No. 1)) and incometaxindia.gov.in/w/section-286-64 (Year: 2025); Rule 10DB(6) and (7) transcribed from incometaxindia.gov.in/w/rule-10db (Income-tax Rules, 1962, no "Year:" stamp) on two separate fetches. It bears on section 286, section 286(7), section 286(9), section 271GB, section 92D, section Rule 10DB, section Rule 10DA, section Rule 26 of the Income Tax Act 1961, in Assessment & Scrutiny and How Tax Law Is Read matters.

Validity check could not be completed. Validity check could not be completed. Section 286(7) is verified on three departmental pages with different "Year:" stamps. The Rs 6,400 crore figure is verified three ways: the departmental Rule 10DB page read on separate fetches with different prompts, that page's footnote 7 recording the substitution for "five thousand five hundred" by the IT (Ninth Amdt.) Rules, 2021 w.r.e.f. 1-4-2021, and CBDT Notification No. 31/2021 dated 5 April 2021 which made that substitution. The department's own footnote under s.286(7) still prints the superseded Rs 5,500 crore figure and is wrong. Section 286(7) itself is unchanged since at least 2019: /w/section-286-66 (Year: 2019 (No. 1)) prints it in the same words as the Year 2025 page. Whether Rule 10DB(6) has been amended again since 2021 could not be established because departmental rule pages carry no "Year:" stamp. I found no judicial decision on s.286(7) and did not check judicial treatment.

Why it matters

Getting the year wrong changes who has to file, and the penalty for not filing under s.271GB is a daily one that escalates. Two further points a reader needs. First, the figure has changed. Rule 10DB(6) originally prescribed five thousand five hundred crore rupees; the departmental page's own footnote records that "six thousand four hundred" was "Substituted for 'five thousand five hundred' by the IT (Ninth Amdt.) Rules, 2021, w.r.e.f. 1-4-2021". A group testing an accounting year before that retrospective date must satisfy itself which figure governs, and anyone reading an older source — including indiankanoon's own page for rule 10DB, which still prints five thousand five hundred crore rupees — will get the old number. Second, and this is a real hazard, the DEPARTMENT'S OWN section 286 page is stale on this point: the footnote to s.286(7) on the page stamped Year 2024 (No. 1) still says "Rule 10DB(6) provides that for the purposes of section 286(7), the total consolidated group revenue of the international group shall be five thousand five hundred crore rupees". The footnote contradicts the rule it purports to summarise. Read the rule, not the footnote. Third, note that the threshold is expressed in rupees and the conversion date under Rule 10DB(7) is the last day of the PRECEDING accounting year, consistently with the year the test looks at — a group converting at the wrong year-end rate can land on the wrong side of the line.

Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.

Not yet CA-verified. This entry was found through the sources listed under the Sources tab, and the summary reflects what those sources say. Nobody has yet read the full judgment and signed it off. Check the source before relying on it.

Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.

Related

Other authorities on the same sections.