My firm paid capital gains tax under the substituted section 45(4) on the money we paid a partner on reconstitution. When the firm later sells the land that was revalued, can it deduct that already-taxed amount from the sale consideration?
Only if the section 45(4) charge arose out of a revaluation of a capital asset or the valuation of a self-generated asset or self-generated goodwill, and only through Rule 8AB. Section 48(iii) allows the firm to deduct so much of the section 45(4) amount as is attributable to the capital asset being transferred, 'calculated in the prescribed manner', and the prescribed manner is Rule 8AB: the amount is spread over the assets in the same proportion as the increase in the value of each asset on revaluation bears to the total increase, and the attribution must be reported in Form 5C by the section 139(1) due date.
Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) on 2021-07-02, reported as Rule 8AB inserted by the Income-tax (Eighteenth Amendment) Rules, 2021, with effect from 2 July 2021 (footnote 66 on the Department's rule page); section 48(iii) inserted by Act No. 13 of 2021 (Finance Act 2021) with effect from 1 April 2021, that is from assessment year 2021-22. It bears on section 45(4), section 48, section 48(iii), section 9B, section Rule 8AB, section Rule 8AA(5), section 139(1), section 140 of the Income Tax Act 1961, in Capital Gains, Deductions & Disallowances and Assessment & Scrutiny matters.
This is the relief limb of the 2021 scheme and it is routinely lost. Rule 8AB(3) is the trap: where the section 45(4) charge does not relate to a revaluation or to the valuation of a self-generated asset or goodwill — for example where a partner is simply paid out cash exceeding his capital account without any revaluation — the amount is attributed to nothing, so no part of it is ever deductible under section 48(iii). Rule 8AB(4) does the same where the amount relates only to the capital asset the partner actually took away. And Explanation 1 makes the whole relief turn on whether the revaluation was based on a report from a registered valuer as defined in rule 11U(g); a revaluation done on the partners' own estimate does not qualify. Explanation 2 separately shuts down the obvious second claim: the revalued increase carries no depreciation. Note also that the attribution rule for the section 48(iii) deduction is Rule 8AB, not Rule 8AA(5) — Rule 8AA(5) does a different job, deciding whether the section 45(4) income is short-term or long-term.
Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.
Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.
The substituted section 45(4), in force from assessment year 2021-22, charges the firm (the 'specified entity') where a partner (the 'specified person') receives money or a capital asset or both from it in connection with a reconstitution, on the amount A = B + C - D, where B is the money received, C is the fair market value of the capital asset received and D is the balance in his capital account at the time of the reconstitution, that balance being computed without the increase attributable to revaluation of any asset or to self-generated goodwill or any other self-generated asset. The firm therefore pays tax on an amount that is, in substance, unrealised appreciation on assets it still holds. Clause (iii) of section 48 was inserted at the same time to prevent that amount being taxed a second time when the firm eventually transfers the asset. Clause (iii) does not itself contain the arithmetic; it says the attributable amount is to be 'calculated in the prescribed manner'. Rule 8AB, inserted by the Income-tax (Eighteenth Amendment) Rules 2021 with effect from 2 July 2021 — the same day CBDT issued its guidelines under section 9B(4) — supplies that manner and prescribes Form 5C for reporting it.
Rule 8AB(1) requires the firm to attribute the section 45(4) amount to the capital assets remaining with it in the manner the rule lays down. Sub-rule (2) is the operative attribution: where the excess charged under section 45(4) relates to revaluation of any capital asset or to valuation of a self-generated asset or self-generated goodwill, the amount attributable to a remaining capital asset bears to the section 45(4) amount the same proportion as the increase in, or recognition of, the value of that asset because of the revaluation or valuation bears to the aggregate of the increase in, or recognition of, the value of all assets because of the revaluation or valuation. Sub-rules (3) and (4) are the two exclusions: where the charged amount does not relate to a revaluation or to the valuation of a self-generated asset or goodwill, and where it relates only to the capital asset actually received by the partner, the amount is not attributed to any capital asset for section 48(iii) at all. Sub-rules (5) to (7) require the attribution to be furnished in Form 5C, electronically, verified by the person authorised under section 140, on or before the due date under Explanation 2 to section 139(1) for the assessment year in which the amount is chargeable under section 45(4). Explanation 1 conditions the whole of sub-rule (2) on the revaluation being based on a valuation report obtained from a registered valuer as defined in clause (g) of rule 11U. Explanation 2 denies depreciation on the increase in value arising from the revaluation or from recognition of self-generated goodwill or a self-generated asset.
The scheme works in three steps and each is deliberately separate. Section 9B deems the firm to have transferred any capital asset or stock in trade that a partner receives on dissolution or reconstitution, at fair market value on the date of receipt. The substituted section 45(4) then charges the firm on money or a capital asset received by the partner in connection with a reconstitution to the extent it exceeds his capital account balance, that balance being stripped of any revaluation or self-generated-asset uplift — which is precisely why the charge falls on appreciation the firm has not realised. Explanation 2 to section 45(4) states that the sub-section operates in addition to section 9B and that taxation under the two provisions is worked out independently. Because the firm has been taxed on unrealised appreciation in assets it still owns, section 48(iii) gives it a corresponding deduction when it does sell, and Rule 8AB decides how much of the charge is carried into which asset. The logic of sub-rules (3) and (4) follows from that: if the charge did not arise from appreciation in retained assets, there is no double taxation to relieve, so nothing is carried forward.
the amount charged to tax under sub-section (4) of section 45 shall not be attributed to any capital asset for the purposes of clause (iii) of section 48
Upload it and we will read it, work out your deadline and draft the reply. A CA reviews before anything is filed.
Handle my notice → Ask a CA on WhatsAppOnly if the section 45(4) charge arose out of a revaluation of a capital asset or the valuation of a self-generated asset or self-generated goodwill, and only through Rule 8AB. Section 48(iii) allows the firm to deduct so much of the section 45(4) amount as is attributable to the capital asset being transferred, 'calculated in the prescribed manner', and the prescribed manner is Rule 8AB: the amount is spread over the assets in the same proportion as the increase in the value of each asset on revaluation bears to the total increase, and the attribution must be reported in Form 5C by the section 139(1) due date. This was decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) and bears on section 45(4), section 48, section 48(iii), section 9B, section Rule 8AB, section Rule 8AA(5), section 139(1), section 140 of the Income Tax Act 1961. It is reported as Rule 8AB inserted by the Income-tax (Eighteenth Amendment) Rules, 2021, with effect from 2 July 2021 (footnote 66 on the Department's rule page); section 48(iii) inserted by Act No. 13 of 2021 (Finance Act 2021) with effect from 1 April 2021, that is from assessment year 2021-22. This is the relief limb of the 2021 scheme and it is routinely lost. Rule 8AB(3) is the trap: where the section 45(4) charge does not relate to a revaluation or to the valuation of a self-generated asset or goodwill — for example where a partner is simply paid out cash exceeding his capital account without any revaluation — the amount is attributed to nothing, so no part of it is ever deductible under section 48(iii). Rule 8AB(4) does the same where the amount relates only to the capital asset the partner actually took away. And Explanation 1 makes the whole relief turn on whether the revaluation was based on a report from a registered valuer as defined in rule 11U(g); a revaluation done on the partners' own estimate does not qualify. Explanation 2 separately shuts down the obvious second claim: the revalued increase carries no depreciation. Note also that the attribution rule for the section 48(iii) deduction is Rule 8AB, not Rule 8AA(5) — Rule 8AA(5) does a different job, deciding whether the section 45(4) income is short-term or long-term. If it applies to you, the first step is this: Establish first whether any part of the section 45(4) charge is traceable to a revaluation or to the valuation of a self-generated asset or self-generated goodwill; if none of it is, do not claim under section 48(iii) at all, because Rule 8AB(3) attributes nothing.
The substituted section 45(4), in force from assessment year 2021-22, charges the firm (the 'specified entity') where a partner (the 'specified person') receives money or a capital asset or both from it in connection with a reconstitution, on the amount A = B + C - D, where B is the money received, C is the fair market value of the capital asset received and D is the balance in his capital account at the time of the reconstitution, that balance being computed without the increase attributable to revaluation of any asset or to self-generated goodwill or any other self-generated asset. The firm therefore pays tax on an amount that is, in substance, unrealised appreciation on assets it still holds. Clause (iii) of section 48 was inserted at the same time to prevent that amount being taxed a second time when the firm eventually transfers the asset. Clause (iii) does not itself contain the arithmetic; it says the attributable amount is to be 'calculated in the prescribed manner'. Rule 8AB, inserted by the Income-tax (Eighteenth Amendment) Rules 2021 with effect from 2 July 2021 — the same day CBDT issued its guidelines under section 9B(4) — supplies that manner and prescribes Form 5C for reporting it. The matter was decided on 2021-07-02 by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text). On those facts the CBDT Circulars & Instructions held as follows. Rule 8AB(1) requires the firm to attribute the section 45(4) amount to the capital assets remaining with it in the manner the rule lays down. Sub-rule (2) is the operative attribution: where the excess charged under section 45(4) relates to revaluation of any capital asset or to valuation of a self-generated asset or self-generated goodwill, the amount attributable to a remaining capital asset bears to the section 45(4) amount the same proportion as the increase in, or recognition of, the value of that asset because of the revaluation or valuation bears to the aggregate of the increase in, or recognition of, the value of all assets because of the revaluation or valuation. Sub-rules (3) and (4) are the two exclusions: where the charged amount does not relate to a revaluation or to the valuation of a self-generated asset or goodwill, and where it relates only to the capital asset actually received by the partner, the amount is not attributed to any capital asset for section 48(iii) at all. Sub-rules (5) to (7) require the attribution to be furnished in Form 5C, electronically, verified by the person authorised under section 140, on or before the due date under Explanation 2 to section 139(1) for the assessment year in which the amount is chargeable under section 45(4). Explanation 1 conditions the whole of sub-rule (2) on the revaluation being based on a valuation report obtained from a registered valuer as defined in clause (g) of rule 11U. Explanation 2 denies depreciation on the increase in value arising from the revaluation or from recognition of self-generated goodwill or a self-generated asset.
The scheme works in three steps and each is deliberately separate. Section 9B deems the firm to have transferred any capital asset or stock in trade that a partner receives on dissolution or reconstitution, at fair market value on the date of receipt. The substituted section 45(4) then charges the firm on money or a capital asset received by the partner in connection with a reconstitution to the extent it exceeds his capital account balance, that balance being stripped of any revaluation or self-generated-asset uplift — which is precisely why the charge falls on appreciation the firm has not realised. Explanation 2 to section 45(4) states that the sub-section operates in addition to section 9B and that taxation under the two provisions is worked out independently. Because the firm has been taxed on unrealised appreciation in assets it still owns, section 48(iii) gives it a corresponding deduction when it does sell, and Rule 8AB decides how much of the charge is carried into which asset. The logic of sub-rules (3) and (4) follows from that: if the charge did not arise from appreciation in retained assets, there is no double taxation to relieve, so nothing is carried forward. In the words reproduced by the source cited on this page: "the amount charged to tax under sub-section (4) of section 45 shall not be attributed to any capital asset for the purposes of clause (iii) of section 48"
It was decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions on 2021-07-02 and is reported as Rule 8AB inserted by the Income-tax (Eighteenth Amendment) Rules, 2021, with effect from 2 July 2021 (footnote 66 on the Department's rule page); section 48(iii) inserted by Act No. 13 of 2021 (Finance Act 2021) with effect from 1 April 2021, that is from assessment year 2021-22. Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them. A CBDT circular or instruction binds officers of the department but not the assessee and not the courts. Where a circular helps you, you may hold the department to it. Where it hurts you, it cannot override the Act or a judgment. On section 45(4), section 48, section 48(iii), section 9B, section Rule 8AB, section Rule 8AA(5), section 139(1), section 140, the practical question is whether the facts of your own notice match the facts of this case closely enough for the same rule to apply.
It cuts both ways and is cited by both sides. Rule 8AB(1) requires the firm to attribute the section 45(4) amount to the capital assets remaining with it in the manner the rule lays down. Sub-rule (2) is the operative attribution: where the excess charged under section 45(4) relates to revaluation of any capital asset or to valuation of a self-generated asset or self-generated goodwill, the amount attributable to a remaining capital asset bears to the section 45(4) amount the same proportion as the increase in, or recognition of, the value of that asset because of the revaluation or valuation bears to the aggregate of the increase in, or recognition of, the value of all assets because of the revaluation or valuation. Sub-rules (3) and (4) are the two exclusions: where the charged amount does not relate to a revaluation or to the valuation of a self-generated asset or goodwill, and where it relates only to the capital asset actually received by the partner, the amount is not attributed to any capital asset for section 48(iii) at all. Sub-rules (5) to (7) require the attribution to be furnished in Form 5C, electronically, verified by the person authorised under section 140, on or before the due date under Explanation 2 to section 139(1) for the assessment year in which the amount is chargeable under section 45(4). Explanation 1 conditions the whole of sub-rule (2) on the revaluation being based on a valuation report obtained from a registered valuer as defined in clause (g) of rule 11U. Explanation 2 denies depreciation on the increase in value arising from the revaluation or from recognition of self-generated goodwill or a self-generated asset. It arises in Capital Gains, Deductions & Disallowances and Assessment & Scrutiny matters, on section 45(4), section 48, section 48(iii), section 9B, section Rule 8AB, section Rule 8AA(5), section 139(1), section 140 of the Income Tax Act 1961, and was decided by Not applicable — statutory text. Before relying on it, read the source linked on this page and check whether it has since been distinguished, overruled or overtaken by an amendment to the Income Tax Act. In practice the steps that follow from it are these. If it is, obtain and keep the valuation report of a registered valuer within rule 11U(g) — Explanation 1 to Rule 8AB makes that report the condition of the attribution. Work the proportion asset by asset: the amount attributed to an asset is the section 45(4) amount multiplied by the increase in that asset's value on revaluation divided by the aggregate increase in the value of all assets revalued. File Form 5C electronically, verified by the person authorised under section 140, on or before the section 139(1) due date for the assessment year in which the section 45(4) amount is charged — the attribution is reported for the year of the charge, not for the later year of sale. Do not claim depreciation on the revalued increase; Explanation 2 to Rule 8AB expressly denies it. When the asset is finally sold, claim the attributed amount as a clause (iii) deduction in the section 48 computation, alongside clauses (i) and (ii), and tie it back to the Form 5C already filed.
Still good law. Rule 8AB and section 48(iii) were read this pass from the Department's current rule page and its Year 2025 section page. The commencement of section 48(iii) was fixed by comparing the Department's year-stamped archived section 48 pages: the clause appears on the Year 2021 and Year 2022 pages and does not appear on the Year 2019 (No. 2) page. No judicial decision considering Rule 8AB was located; a search of the Tribunal corpus for the statutory phrase 'reconstitution of the specified entity' returned ten orders, none of which turns on the attribution rule. Later treatment of the rule was therefore not checked and no amendment to it after 2 July 2021 was found on the page read. No source could be cited for that finding. Checking whether an authority still stands matters as much as knowing what it held: a decision may be overruled on one point and survive on another, or the provision it interprets may have been amended since. Read the source and the editor's note on this page before relying on it in a reply to an Assessing Officer or in an appeal.
Statutory entry, not a decision. 'tier' is set to 'cbdt' because the library's fixed tier vocabulary has no value for a statutory entry; the source is the Income-tax Department's own rule and section pages, not a Board circular. 'decided_on' is the date Rule 8AB takes effect, 2 July 2021, not a date of decision. Rule 8AB was read from the Department's current rule page, which carries an upload date of 13 December 2025 and no archival 'Year' stamp; its heading reads 'Attribution of income taxable under sub-section (4) of section 45 to the capital assets remaining with the specified entity, under section 48' and footnote 66 records 'Inserted by the IT (Eighteenth Amdt.) Rules, 2021, w.e.f. 2-7-2021'. The rule has eight sub-rules; sub-rule (8) is the Principal DGIT (Systems) / DGIT (Systems) procedure and format provision and is not set out above. A trap on the Department's current section 48 page, resolved: the page prints a footnote 'Ins. by Act No. 08 of 2023, w.e.f. 1-4-2024' whose marker 48a sits on the PROVISO TO CLAUSE (ii) — the proviso excluding section 24(b) and Chapter VI-A interest from cost of acquisition — and not on clause (iii). Clause (iii) carries no footnote marker on the Year 2025 page. Its true commencement was taken from the Department's Year 2021 page for section 48, /w/section-48-59, where clause (iii) carries footnote 29: 'Ins. by the Act No. 13 of 2021, w.e.f. 1-4-2021.' The Department's Year 2009 page for section 48 has no clause (iii) at all. This library shows the verification state of every entry openly. This entry has not yet been read in full by a chartered accountant. The summary reflects the sources listed on this page. Read the source before you rely on it in a reply to an Assessing Officer or in an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Rule 8AB(1) requires the firm to attribute the section 45(4) amount to the capital assets remaining with it in the manner the rule lays down. Sub-rule (2) is the operative attribution: where the excess charged under section 45(4) relates to revaluation of any capital asset or to valuation of a self-generated asset or self-generated goodwill, the amount attributable to a remaining capital asset bears to the section 45(4) amount the same proportion as the increase in, or recognition of, the value of that asset because of the revaluation or valuation bears to the aggregate of the increase in, or recognition of, the value of all assets because of the revaluation or valuation. Sub-rules (3) and (4) are the two exclusions: where the charged amount does not relate to a revaluation or to the valuation of a self-generated asset or goodwill, and where it relates only to the capital asset actually received by the partner, the amount is not attributed to any capital asset for section 48(iii) at all. Sub-rules (5) to (7) require the attribution to be furnished in Form 5C, electronically, verified by the person authorised under section 140, on or before the due date under Explanation 2 to section 139(1) for the assessment year in which the amount is chargeable under section 45(4). Explanation 1 conditions the whole of sub-rule (2) on the revaluation being based on a valuation report obtained from a registered valuer as defined in clause (g) of rule 11U. Explanation 2 denies depreciation on the increase in value arising from the revaluation or from recognition of self-generated goodwill or a self-generated asset.
Every entry in this library links to where it was found, so you can check it yourself rather than take our word for it.
Our JDA was never registered and the project collapsed. Am I still taxed on capital gains?
The firm revalued its land and credited the surplus to the partners' capital accounts. Is that taxable?
I sold a depreciable asset held for over three years. Can I still claim the capital gains exemption?
The AO says I sold below market value and wants to tax the difference. Can he do that?