VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › CBDT Circulars & Instructions › Statutory position — Rule 8AA(5): whether the section 45(4) charge on the firm is short-term or long-term
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both waysRule 8AA(5)s.45(4)s.9Bs.48(iii)Rule 8ABs.2(42A)s.50

Statutory position — Rule 8AA(5): whether the section 45(4) charge on the firm is short-term or long-term

The firm has been charged under section 45(4) on a payout to a partner on reconstitution. Is that gain short-term or long-term, and how do I work out the split?

The Income-tax Act, 1961 was repealed on 1 April 2026. It still governs income earned up to 31 March 2026, and every proceeding about those years however late — assessment, reassessment, rectification, penalty, revision and appeal alike. Income earned from 1 April 2026 is governed by the Income-tax Act, 2025. What changed, and which Act governs your year →

The firm has been charged under section 45(4) on a payout to a partner on reconstitution. Is that gain short-term or long-term, and how do I work out the split?

You look through the charge to the assets the amount has been attributed to. Rule 8AA(5) deems the amount, or a part of it, to be from the transfer of a short-term capital asset where it is attributed to an asset that is short-term at the time of the section 45(4) taxation, to an asset forming part of a block of assets, or to a self-generated asset or self-generated goodwill; and to be from the transfer of a long-term capital asset where it is attributed to any other asset that is long-term at that time. One section 45(4) charge can therefore split into a short-term part and a long-term part.

Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) on 2021-07-02, reported as Sub-rule (5) inserted in Rule 8AA by the Income-tax (Eighteenth Amendment) Rules, 2021, with effect from 2 July 2021. It bears on section Rule 8AA(5), section 45(4), section 9B, section 48(iii), section Rule 8AB, section 2(42A), section 50 of the Income Tax Act 1961, in Capital Gains and Assessment & Scrutiny matters.

Still good law. The sub-rule has been read from the Department's own rule page. The footnote there dates sub-rule (5) to the Income-tax (Eighteenth Amendment) Rules, 2021, with effect from 2 July 2021, and no later amendment to the sub-rule appears. No judicial decision considering Rule 8AA(5) has been located, and later treatment has not been checked. Two things qualify that. A rule has no life of its own: it stands or falls with the section under which it is made, and sub-rule (5) is made for the substituted section 45(4). If that section is amended, or if the charge it creates is read down, the characterisation the sub-rule performs goes with it, and this entry should not be relied on for a later year without checking the section first. And the absence of judicial consideration is a real absence rather than a sign of settled acceptance. The sub-rule allocates the amount charged under section 45(4) between short-term and long-term by reference to the assets to which it is attributed under Rule 8AB, and the questions that arise on that allocation — how it works where a reconstitution involves assets of both kinds, and what happens where the amount attributed exceeds the gain on the asset in question — have not been tested anywhere. A practitioner working a reconstitution should expect to argue the mechanics from the words of the rule and of section 48(iii), and should keep the attribution working papers, because there is no decision to cite.

Why it matters

Two of the three short-term limbs catch firms out. First, anything attributed to a capital asset forming part of a block of assets is short-term without more — the firm's long-held factory building, being depreciable and in a block, produces a short-term charge no matter how long it has been held, which is consistent with section 50 but is regularly missed when the return is prepared. Second, self-generated goodwill and other self-generated assets are always short-term, and those are the very items a reconstitution revaluation is usually built on. That matters for the rate, for indexation, and for what losses can be set off against the charge. The characterisation also has to be settled at the same time as the Rule 8AB attribution, because the two rules use the same attribution: Rule 8AA(5) asks what the amount was attributed to, and that answer comes from Rule 8AB.

Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.

Not yet CA-verified. This entry was found through the sources listed under the Sources tab, and the summary reflects what those sources say. Nobody has yet read the full judgment and signed it off. Check the source before relying on it.

Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.

Related

Other authorities on the same sections.
Every authority on the provisions this decision turns on: all 17 on s.2(42A) · all 14 on s.45(4) · all 12 on s.50

Used in these worked examples

Notice situations where this decision carries one of the steps.
A partner retires on 30 September 2024 taking a flat and Rs 90,00,000, after the firm revalued its landMy firm revalued its land, credited the surplus to all four partners and then paid one of them out in cash and a flat when he retired - what is the firm taxed on, and is the partner taxed as well?