VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Income-tax Act 2025 › Chapter IV › Section 86
Chapter IVwas s.54F

Section 86 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 86 — Capital gains on transfer of certain capital assets not to be charged in case of investment in residential house. Successor to s.54F of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 86 is in Chapter IV — Computation of Total Income, which runs from section 13 to section 95.

← Section 85  ·  Section 87 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) relieves an individual or Hindu undivided family from the capital gains charge on the transfer of a long-term capital asset that is not a residential house (the original asset), where within one year before or two years after the date of transfer he purchases, or within three years after it constructs, one residential house in India (the new asset). If the net consideration exceeds the cost of the new asset, the exempt part of the gain bears the same proportion to the whole gain as that cost bears to the net consideration; if the net consideration is equal to or less than the cost, no capital gains is charged under section 67.

Sub-section (2) covers money not yet spent: net consideration not utilised within one year before the transfer, or not utilised for purchase or construction before the return under section 263 is filed, must be deposited in a specified bank or institution and used as per the scheme notified by the Central Government, the deposit being made before filing the return and not later than the section 263 due date, with proof submitted along with the return. Sub-section (3) treats the amount utilised together with the deposit as the cost of the new asset, subject to sub-section (8).

Sub-section (4) withdraws relief on unused deposits: where the deposit is not wholly or partly utilised within the period in sub-section (1), X minus Y is charged under section 67 as income of the tax year in which three years from the date of transfer expires — X being the gain not charged under sub-section (1) and Y the gain that would not have been charged had the cost of the new asset been the amount actually utilised.

Sub-sections (5) to (7) disqualify and claw back. Sub-section (1) does not apply where the assessee owns more than one residential house other than the new asset on the date of transfer, or purchases another within one year, or constructs another within three years, and the income from such house (other than the one owned on the date of transfer) is chargeable under "Income from house property". Sub-section (6) charges the exempted gain as long-term capital gains of the year in which another such residential house is purchased within two years or constructed within three years after the transfer; sub-section (7) does the same where the new asset itself is transferred within three years of its purchase or construction.

Sub-sections (8) and (9) impose the ten crore rupee ceilings — cost of the new asset above ten crore rupees is left out of account for sub-section (1), and net consideration above ten crore rupees for sub-section (2). Sub-section (10) defines net consideration as the full value of the consideration on the transfer reduced by expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with it.

Why it is there

The relief is for a taxpayer who converts a long-term investment into a home, so it is measured against the whole net consideration rather than the gain — the entire sale proceeds must go into the house to escape the charge completely. The disqualification and clawback rules keep the concession for people acquiring a house to live in rather than adding to a portfolio, and the ten crore ceilings cap what an expensive house can shelter.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Window for purchasing the new residential houseOne year before, or two years after, the date of transferPurchase of one residential house in IndiaSub-section (1)(b)
Window for constructing the new residential houseThree years after the date of transferConstruction of one residential house in IndiaSub-section (1)(b)
Exempt proportion where net consideration exceeds cost of the new assetCapital gains × cost of the new asset ÷ net considerationOnly where the net consideration is more than the cost of the new assetSub-section (1)(i)
Full exemptionNo capital gains charged under section 67Where the net consideration is equal to or less than the cost of the new assetSub-section (1)(ii)
Outer date for depositing unutilised net considerationBefore filing the return and not later than the section 263 due dateApplies to net consideration not utilised for purchase or construction before the return is filedSub-section (2)(b)
Year in which unutilised deposit is chargedThe tax year in which three years from the date of transfer of the original asset expiresWhere the deposited amount is not wholly or partly utilised within the period specified in sub-section (1)Sub-section (4)(a)
Ownership disqualification on the date of transferMore than one residential house other than the new assetRead with clause (b) — the income from such house, other than the one house owned on the date of transfer, must be chargeable under "Income from house property"Sub-section (5)(a)(i)
Clawback where another residential house is acquiredWithin two years after the transfer if purchased, or three years if constructedWhere the income from that other house is chargeable under "Income from house property"; the exempted gain is charged as long-term capital gains of that yearSub-section (6)
Lock-in on the new assetThree years from the date of its purchase or constructionTransfer within that period charges the exempted gain as long-term capital gains of the year of transferSub-section (7)
Ceiling on the cost of the new assetTen crore rupeesAny excess over ten crore rupees is not taken into account for sub-section (1)Sub-section (8)
Ceiling on net consideration for the deposit ruleTen crore rupeesAny excess over ten crore rupees is not taken into account for sub-section (2)Sub-section (9)

What this means in practice

The comparison in sub-section (1) is between the cost of the new asset and the net consideration, not the gain, so putting only the gain into the house leaves part of it chargeable. The two ten crore ceilings operate by ignoring the excess rather than denying relief, and they bite at different points — sub-section (8) on the cost side, sub-section (9) on the net consideration side. Sub-section (5) is a two-limb test: owning other houses is not fatal unless the income from them is chargeable under "Income from house property". Where the deposit stays unspent, the charge arises in the tax year in which three years from the transfer expire.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An individual transfers long-term unlisted shares for a net consideration of Rs. 4 crore, realising a gain of Rs. 3 crore, and buys one residential house in India for Rs. 3 crore within two years. Because the net consideration exceeds the cost of the new asset, sub-section (1)(i) exempts Rs. 3 crore × 3 ÷ 4, that is Rs. 2.25 crore, and Rs. 75 lakh remains chargeable under section 67. If he sells that house two years later, sub-section (7) charges the Rs. 2.25 crore as long-term capital gains of the year of sale.

Where you meet this section

You claim it in the return for the tax year of transfer, with proof of any deposit submitted along with that return. You meet it again as an addition in the year three years from the transfer expire where the deposit was never spent, or in the year a second house is bought or the new house sold.

The words themselves

within one year before, or two years after, the date of such transfer, purchased, or has within three years after that date constructed, one residential house in India (new asset)
Section 86(1)(b), Income-tax Act, 2025.
If the cost of the new asset exceeds ten crore rupees, the amount exceeding ten crore rupees, shall not be taken into account for the purposes of sub-section (1)
Section 86(8), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 86. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

Work it out

Free calculators on VittSphere ONE for the very provision this page is about. They open in the same window.

Further reading

Written up on the VittSphere ONE blog.
What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.