VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Income-tax Act 2025 › Chapter IV › Section 74
Chapter IVwas s.50

Section 74 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 74 — Special provision for computation of capital gains in case of depreciable assets. Successor to s.50 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 74 is in Chapter IV — Computation of Total Income, which runs from section 13 to section 95.

← Section 73  ·  Section 75 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) sets the field: notwithstanding section 2(101), where a capital asset forms part of a block of assets on which depreciation has been allowed under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the Income-tax Act, 1961 or this Act, sections 72 and 73 apply subject to sub-sections (2) and (3).

Sub-section (2) deals with the block that survives. Where in the tax year the full value of consideration for transfer of one or more assets in a block exceeds the total of the transfer expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer, the written down value of the block at the start of the year, and the actual cost of any asset in the block acquired during the year, the excess is deemed to be capital gains arising from the transfer of short-term capital assets.

Sub-section (3) deals with the block that disappears. Where a block ceases to exist because all assets in it are transferred during the year, the cost of acquisition of the block is its written down value at the beginning of the year increased by the actual cost of any asset in that block acquired during the year, and the income received or accruing from the transfer is deemed to be capital gains from the transfer of short-term capital assets.

Why it is there

Depreciation has already been allowed on these assets, so the ordinary capital gains machinery in sections 72 and 73 cannot run on them without giving a second benefit on the same cost. The section replaces the individual asset's cost with the block's written down value and forces the result into the short-term category.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Amount deemed to be short-term capital gains where the block survivesThe excess of full value of consideration over the total of transfer expenditure, opening written down value of the block, and actual cost of assets in the block acquired during the yearTransfer during the tax year of one or more assets in the blockSub-section (2)
Cost of acquisition where the block ceases to existWritten down value of the block at the beginning of the tax year, increased by the actual cost of any asset in that block acquired during the yearAll assets in the block are transferred during the tax yearSub-section (3)(a)

What this means in practice

The character of the gain is fixed by the section, not by the holding period: whatever comes out of sub-section (2) or (3) is capital gains from the transfer of short-term capital assets, so a plant held for fifteen years produces a short-term gain. The two sub-sections do different arithmetic — sub-section (2) taxes only the excess over the block's written down value and additions and leaves the block running, while sub-section (3) applies only when the block is emptied and gives the whole block's written down value plus additions as the cost. Sub-section (1) reaches assets depreciated under the 1922 Act and the 1961 Act, not only under this Act.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A company's block of plant opens the tax year with a written down value of Rs. 40 lakh, it buys a machine for that block during the year for Rs. 10 lakh, and it sells one machine from the block for Rs. 65 lakh, incurring Rs. 1 lakh of brokerage on the sale. The total under sub-section (2) is Rs. 51 lakh, so Rs. 14 lakh is deemed to be capital gains from the transfer of a short-term capital asset, even though the machine sold had been held for many years. If instead every asset in that block had been sold in the same year, sub-section (3) would apply and the cost of acquisition would be Rs. 50 lakh — the opening written down value plus the year's addition.

Where you meet this section

You meet it in the capital gains schedule of a return where a depreciable asset has been sold, and in an assessment order that recharacterises a long-term gain claimed on plant, machinery or a building as short-term because the asset was in a block on which depreciation had been allowed.

The words themselves

such excess shall be deemed to be capital gains arising from the transfer of short-term capital assets
Section 74(2), Income-tax Act, 2025.
the cost of acquisition of the block of assets shall be the written down value of the block of assets at the beginning of the tax year, as increased by the actual cost of any asset falling within that block of assets, acquired by the assessee during the tax year
Section 74(3)(a), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 74. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

Work it out

Free calculators on VittSphere ONE for the very provision this page is about. They open in the same window.
What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.