VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter IV › Section 71
Chapter IVwas s.47A

Section 71 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 71 — Withdrawal of exemption in certain cases. Successor to s.47A of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 71 is in Chapter IV — Computation of Total Income, which runs from section 13 to section 95.

← Section 70  ·  Section 72 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) reverses the holding-company relief: where a transfer of a capital asset escaped charge under section 67 because of section 70(1)(c) or (d), the gain is deemed to be income under "Capital gains" of the tax year in which the transfer took place if, at any time within eight years of that transfer, the transferee company converts the asset into or treats it as stock-in-trade, or the parent or holding company ceases to hold the whole of the subsidiary's share capital. Sub-section (2) does the same for conditions in section 70(zd) or (zf): on non-compliance, the previously exempt gain on the capital asset or intangible asset becomes capital gains of the successor company for the tax year in which the condition is broken. Sub-section (3) applies the same treatment where section 70(ze) conditions fail, charging the gain to the successor limited liability partnership or to the shareholder of the predecessor company for the year of non-compliance.

Why it is there

The transfers exempted under section 70 are exempt because the asset is expected to stay within the group or the successor entity on the stated terms; this section withdraws the exemption when that premise fails. The three sub-sections differ deliberately on who is charged and in which year, matching the person who broke the condition.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Period within which the disqualifying event triggers withdrawal of the section 70(1)(c) or (d) exemption8 yearsFrom the date of the transfer; the trigger is conversion of the asset into stock-in-trade or the holding company ceasing to hold the whole share capital of the subsidiarySub-section (1)

What this means in practice

The year of charge is not uniform, and getting it wrong misplaces the whole assessment. Under sub-section (1) the gain goes back to the tax year of the original transfer, so a breach in year seven reopens year one; under sub-sections (2) and (3) it is charged in the tax year in which the condition is not complied with. The eight-year clock in sub-section (1) runs from the date of transfer, and it is broken by the holding company ceasing to hold the whole of the share capital — any dilution at all, not a fall below a majority.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A holding company transfers a warehouse to its wholly owned subsidiary and a gain of Rs. 12 crore escapes charge under section 67 by virtue of section 70(1)(c). In the sixth year after the transfer it sells 5% of the subsidiary's shares: it no longer holds the whole of the share capital, sub-section (1)(b) bites, and the Rs. 12 crore is deemed capital gains of the tax year in which the transfer took place — the earlier year is reopened, not the year of the sale. Had the sale waited until the ninth year the eight-year window in sub-section (1) would have closed and nothing would have been charged; and had the breach instead been of a section 70(zd) condition, sub-section (2) would have charged the successor company in the tax year of non-compliance rather than reaching back.

Where you meet this section

In an assessment or reassessment order for the year of the original transfer, which is the year sub-section (1) charges, or in the successor's assessment for the year the condition failed under sub-sections (2) and (3). The section names no form and no authority — the exemption it withdraws was claimed under section 70 in an earlier return.

The words themselves

shall, irrespective of anything contained in the said clauses, be deemed to be income chargeable under the head "Capital gains" of the tax year in which such transfer took place
Section section 71(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 71. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.