VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter IV › Section 70
Chapter IVwas s.47

Section 70 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 70 — Transactions not regarded as transfer. Successor to s.47 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 70 is in Chapter IV — Computation of Total Income, which runs from section 13 to section 95.

← Section 69  ·  Section 71 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) is a list of transactions to which section 67 — the capital gains charge — does not apply, running through clauses (a) to (zl), roughly thirty-eight limbs. They fall into groups: family and gratuitous transfers (partition of a HUF, will, gift, irrevocable trust); intra-group transfers between a wholly owned Indian subsidiary and its parent; amalgamations and demergers, including foreign-to-foreign transfers of Indian shares and of shares deriving value substantially from Indian shares; co-operative bank business reorganisations; specified non-resident to non-resident transfers of bonds, GDRs, rupee denominated bonds and Government securities, and ifsc exchange transactions in foreign currency; fund relocations to an ifsc resultant fund; redemption of Sovereign Gold Bonds and conversion between gold and Electronic Gold Receipts; conversions of bonds, debentures and preference shares into shares; gifts of art and manuscripts to the Government, a University or a national institution; conversion of a firm or a sole proprietorship into a company and of a company into an llp; securities lending, reverse mortgage, transfers to a business trust, and mutual fund scheme and plan consolidations. Sub-section (2) is a Table of twelve rows that supplies the definitions applying to the individual clauses — banking company, business reorganisation, derivative, Government security, original fund, relocation, resultant fund, Electronic Gold Receipt, University, private company, special purpose vehicle, consolidating and consolidated schemes and plans, equity oriented fund and joint venture. Clause (x) on Sovereign Gold Bonds has been substituted by Act No. 4 of 2026 with effect from 1 April 2026.

Why it is there

Section 67 charges gains on any transfer, so this section carves out transactions where ownership changes form but not economic substance — reorganisations, conversions, intra-group moves — and a set of policy exclusions for non-residents, ifsc transactions and gifts to national institutions. Most limbs carry continuity conditions, which is the price of the exclusion: the deferred gain is meant to surface later in the transferee's hands.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Shareholder continuity in a foreign amalgamationAt least 25% of shareholdersShareholders of the amalgamating foreign company must continue as shareholders of the amalgamated foreign company, and the transfer must not attract capital gains tax in the country of incorporationSub-section (1)(g)(i) and (h)(i)
Shareholder continuity in a foreign demergerNot less than 75% in value of sharesShareholders of the demerged foreign company must continue as shareholders of the resulting foreign company, and the transfer must not attract capital gains tax in the country of incorporationSub-section (1)(l)(i) and (m)(i)
Partners' shareholding after a firm is succeeded by a companyNot less than 50% of total voting power, held for five yearsAggregate shareholding of the erstwhile partners, continuing for five years from the date of succession; all assets and liabilities must pass and no consideration other than shares may be receivedSub-section (1)(zd)(iv)
Turnover ceiling on conversion of a company into an llpSixty lakh rupeesTotal sales, turnover or gross receipts of the company must not exceed this in any of the three tax years preceding the year of conversionSub-section (1)(ze)(v)
Asset ceiling on conversion of a company into an llpFive crore rupeesTotal value of assets as appearing in the books in any of the three tax years preceding the year of conversionSub-section (1)(ze)(vi)
Profit sharing ratio of erstwhile shareholders in the llpNot less than 50%At any time during five years from the date of conversionSub-section (1)(ze)(iv)
Bar on paying out accumulated profits after llp conversionThree yearsNo amount out of the accumulated profit standing on the date of conversion may be paid to any partner, directly or indirectly, for three years from conversionSub-section (1)(ze)(vii)
Sole proprietor's shareholding after succession by a companyNot less than 50% of total voting power, held for five yearsContinuing for five years from the date of succession, with all business assets and liabilities passing and no consideration other than sharesSub-section (1)(zf)(ii)
Outer date for a fund relocation31st March, 2030The transfer of assets of the original fund or its wholly owned spv to the resultant fund must be on or before this dateSub-section (2), Table Sl. No. 5, definition of 'relocation'
Equity threshold for an equity oriented fundMore than 65% of total proceedsInvested in equity shares of domestic companies, computed as the annual average of the monthly averages of opening and closing figuresSub-section (2), Table Sl. No. 10

What this means in practice

Find the exact clause your transaction falls under and read its conditions as cumulative — the continuity, consideration and residence requirements in clauses (f) to (m), (zd), (ze) and (zf) are what the exclusion turns on, and a shortfall in any one of them puts the transaction back inside section 67. Several conditions run for years after the event, notably the five-year 50% shareholding and profit-sharing tests on a firm or proprietorship conversion and on an llp conversion, and the three-year bar on distributing pre-conversion accumulated profits, so the exclusion can be lost long after the transaction closes. Definitions are not in the clause you are reading: sub-section (2)'s Table maps definitions to clauses, and the resultant fund, special purpose vehicle and mutual fund definitions send you on to Schedules V, VI and VII. For a Sovereign Gold Bond, note the amended clause (x): from 1 April 2026 the exclusion applies to redemption only where an individual has held the bond from the date of original issue until maturity.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A private company with turnover of Rs. 55 lakh in each of the three tax years before conversion, and assets in its books of Rs. 4 crore, converts into a limited liability partnership under section 56 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008. Clause (ze) keeps the transfer outside section 67: it is under the sixty lakh rupees turnover ceiling in item (v) and the five crore rupees asset ceiling in item (vi). But the exclusion is not final on the day of conversion — if within five years the erstwhile shareholders’ aggregate profit sharing ratio in the llp falls below 50%, item (iv) fails, and if any part of the accumulated profit standing on the date of conversion is paid to a partner within three years, item (vii) fails. A company whose turnover had touched Rs. 70 lakh in even one of those three years would never have been inside clause (ze) at all.

Where you meet this section

In the capital gains computation in the return — the transaction is reported but no gain is charged, because section 67 is disapplied — and then in the assessment that tests the clause’s conditions, often years later when a continuity test in clause (zd), (ze) or (zf) breaks. The section names no form and no authority; it is a list of exclusions read against section 67, with its own definitions supplied by the Table in sub-section (2).

The words themselves

The provisions of section 67 shall not apply to transfer— (a) by way of distribution of capital assets on the total or partial partition of a Hindu undivided family
s.70(1)(a), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Rules that serve this section

Rules of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 that work section 70. Where the rule’s own heading names the section we say so; the rest are marked on reading the rule, which is our derivation and not the department’s. A rule that serves the section silently and that we have missed will not appear here.

All of them are in the Rules 2026 index.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See every circular and notification on this section, or the circulars index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See every circular and notification on this section, or the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 70. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.