VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter IV › Section 56
Chapter IVwas s.43D

Section 56 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 56 — Special provision in case of interest income of specified financial institutions. Successor to s.43D of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 56 is in Chapter IV — Computation of Total Income, which runs from section 13 to section 95.

← Section 55  ·  Section 57 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) overrides anything to the contrary in the Act and fixes the year of charge for one kind of receipt: interest income in relation to bad or doubtful debts of a specified financial institution is chargeable under "Profits and gains of business or profession" in the tax year in which the interest is credited to the profit and loss account, or actually received, whichever is earlier.

Sub-section (2) supplies the two definitions the rule turns on. A "specified financial institution" is a public financial institution, a scheduled bank, a co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank, a State Financial Corporation, a State Industrial Investment Corporation, or any such class of non-banking financial companies as the Central Government may notify. "Bad or doubtful debts" are such categories of debts as may be prescribed, having regard to the guidelines issued in relation to such debts by the Reserve Bank of India.

Why it is there

Interest on a loan that has gone bad keeps accruing on paper long after any prospect of collection has gone, and taxing it on accrual would tax income the lender may never receive. The section substitutes a receipt-or-recognition test for accrual, and it does not leave the lender to decide which debts qualify — the categories are prescribed with regard to Reserve Bank of India guidelines.

Who it applies to

What this means in practice

This is a timing rule and nothing more — the interest is taxed, only later. Both limbs bite, and the earlier of them governs: crediting the interest to the profit and loss account brings it to charge even though nothing has been collected, so a lender that recognises the income in its books cannot then defer it for tax. The relief is confined twice over, once by the closed list of institutions in sub-section (2)(a) and again by the categories of debt prescribed under sub-section (2)(b); a lender outside the list, or a debt outside the prescribed categories, stays on the ordinary basis of charge. A non-banking financial company gets nothing from this section unless its class has been notified.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A scheduled bank holds a loan falling in a prescribed bad or doubtful category. Interest of 40 lakh rupees accrues on it during a tax year, but the bank neither credits it to the profit and loss account nor recovers anything. Nothing is charged that year. If it recovers 15 lakh in the following year, that 15 lakh is charged in the year of receipt; and if in a later year it credits the balance of the interest to the profit and loss account without recovering it, the credited amount is charged then.

Where you meet this section

In the computation of a bank's or financial institution's business income, and in an assessment where the Assessing Officer proposes to add interest accrued on non-performing advances. A borrower never meets this section — it governs the lender's year of charge, not the borrower's deduction.

The words themselves

the interest income in relation to bad or doubtful debts of a specified financial institution shall be chargeable to tax under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession" in the tax year in which such interest is— (a) credited to the profit and loss account; or (b) actually received, whichever is earlier
Section 56(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.
"bad or doubtful debts" shall be such categories of debts, as may be prescribed, having regard to the guidelines issued in relation to such debts by the Reserve Bank of India
Section 56(2)(b), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Rules that serve this section

Rules of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 that work section 56. Where the rule’s own heading names the section we say so; the rest are marked on reading the rule, which is our derivation and not the department’s. A rule that serves the section silently and that we have missed will not appear here.

All of them are in the Rules 2026 index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 56. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.