VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Income-tax Act 2025 › Chapter XXII › Section 478
Chapter XXIIwas s.276C

Section 478 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 478 — Wilful attempt to evade tax, etc. Successor to s.276C of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 478 is in Chapter XXII — Offences and Prosecutions, which runs from section 473 to section 498.

← Section 477  ·  Section 479 →

What this section does

Sub-sections (1) and (2) as they now stand were substituted by Act No. 4 of 2026 with effect from 1 April 2026.

Sub-section (1) punishes a person who wilfully attempts in any manner to evade any tax, penalty or interest chargeable or imposable under the Act, or who under-reports his income, on a scale graded by amount: simple imprisonment up to two years, or fine, or both, where the amount sought to be evaded or the tax on under-reported income exceeds fifty lakh rupees; simple imprisonment up to six months, or fine, or both, where it exceeds ten lakh rupees but does not exceed fifty lakh rupees; and fine, in any other case. Sub-section (2) punishes a person who wilfully attempts in any manner to evade payment of any tax, penalty or interest, on the same three-tier scale.

Sub-section (3) provides that the punishment is without prejudice to any penalty imposable under any other provision. Sub-section (4) defines what a wilful attempt to evade includes: possession or control of books of account or other documents relevant to a proceeding containing a false entry or statement; making or causing to be made a false entry or statement in them; wilfully omitting or causing to be omitted any relevant entry or statement; or causing any other circumstance to exist which will have the effect of enabling the person to evade the tax, penalty or interest or its payment.

Why it is there

The section makes evasion a criminal offence in addition to a taxable and penalisable one, and sub-section (4) is what makes it prosecutable — it converts the abstract idea of a wilful attempt into four identifiable acts centred on the books of account. The graded scale ties severity to the amount involved, and sub-section (3) makes clear the criminal charge is additional to, not in substitution for, the civil penalty.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Punishment where the amount evaded or the tax on under-reported income exceeds fifty lakh rupeesSimple imprisonment for a term up to two years, or fine, or bothSubstituted by Act No. 4 of 2026 w.e.f. 1-4-2026; applies alike under sub-sections (1) and (2)Sub-sections (1)(a) and (2)(a)
Punishment where that amount exceeds ten lakh rupees but does not exceed fifty lakh rupeesSimple imprisonment for a term up to six months, or fine, or bothSubstituted by Act No. 4 of 2026 w.e.f. 1-4-2026; applies alike under sub-sections (1) and (2)Sub-sections (1)(b) and (2)(b)
Punishment in any other caseFineWhere the amount sought to be evaded or the tax on under-reported income does not exceed ten lakh rupeesSub-sections (1)(c) and (2)(c)

What this means in practice

Three features of the substituted text change how the offence works. The imprisonment is simple, not rigorous; there is no minimum term, only a maximum, so the court's discretion runs from nothing upward; and the lowest tier carries no imprisonment at all. The thresholds of ten lakh and fifty lakh rupees are measured on the amount sought to be evaded or the tax on the under-reported income, not on the income itself. Sub-sections (1) and (2) cover different conduct — evading tax that is chargeable or imposable, and evading payment of tax already fixed — so concealment and defeating recovery both fall within the section on the same scale. Sub-section (4) is inclusive: mere possession or control of books containing a false entry, without any showing that the person made it, is within the definition.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A firm omits sales of Rs. 3 crore from its books, on which the tax works out to Rs. 90 lakh. Because that exceeds fifty lakh rupees, sub-section (1)(a) applies and the punishment may extend to simple imprisonment for two years, or fine, or both. Had the tax been Rs. 20 lakh, clause (b) would apply with a maximum of six months; below ten lakh rupees, clause (c) leaves only a fine. Under sub-section (3) the firm remains exposed to any penalty imposable under other provisions.

Where you meet this section

This is the charge in a criminal complaint filed against a taxpayer before the court trying offences under the Act, usually following an assessment or penalty proceeding in which under-reporting or a false entry was found. It does not appear in an assessment order itself.

The words themselves

with simple imprisonment for a term up to two years, or with fine, or with both, where the amount sought to be evaded or tax on under-reported income exceeds fifty lakh rupees
Section 478(1)(a), as substituted by Act No. 4 of 2026 w.e.f. 1-4-2026, Income-tax Act, 2025.
has in his possession or control any books of account or other documents (being books of account or other documents relevant to any proceeding under this Act) containing a false entry or statement
Section 478(4)(a), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Rules that serve this section

Rules of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 that work section 478. Where the rule’s own heading names the section we say so; the rest are marked on reading the rule, which is our derivation and not the department’s. A rule that serves the section silently and that we have missed will not appear here.

All of them are in the Rules 2026 index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 478. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.