VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter IV › Section 44
Chapter IVwas s.35D

Section 44 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 44 — Amortisation of certain preliminary expenses. Successor to s.35D of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 44 is in Chapter IV — Computation of Total Income, which runs from section 13 to section 95.

← Section 43  ·  Section 45 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) allows an Indian company, or a person other than a company who is resident in India, a deduction of one-fifth of qualifying expenditure for each of five successive tax years. The expenditure must be incurred either before the commencement of the business, under clause (a), or after commencement in connection with the extension of the undertaking or the setting up of a new unit, under clause (b). The five years start with the tax year in which the business commences for a clause (a) case, and with the tax year in which the extension is completed or the new unit commences production or operation for a clause (b) case.

Sub-section (2) fixes what qualifies: clause (a) covers feasibility report, project report, market survey or any other survey necessary for the business, and engineering services relating to the business; clause (b) covers legal charges for drafting any agreement between the assessee and another person relating to the setting up or conduct of the business; clause (c) adds, for a company only, legal charges for drafting and printing the Memorandum and Articles of Association, fees for registering the company under the Companies Act, 2013, and public issue expenditure being underwriting commission, brokerage and charges for drafting, typing, printing and advertisement of the prospectus; clause (d) leaves room for other prescribed items, excluding expenditure eligible for any allowance or deduction under any other provision. Sub-section (3) requires a statement of particulars of sub-section (2)(a) expenditure in the prescribed form and manner.

Sub-section (4) caps the aggregate at 5%, computed either on the cost of the project, or, where the assessee is an Indian company, at its option, on the capital employed in the business of the company. Sub-section (5) defines both bases. Cost of the project is the actual cost of fixed assets — land, buildings, leaseholds, plant, machinery, furniture, fittings and railway sidings, including expenditure on development of land and buildings — as shown in the books on the last day of the tax year in which the business commences, or, for an extension or new unit, on the last day of the year of completion or commencement, so far as those assets were acquired or developed for that extension or new unit. Capital employed is the aggregate of issued share capital, debentures and long-term borrowings on the same closing day, similarly confined to what was issued or obtained for the extension or new unit. Long-term borrowings means moneys borrowed from Government, the Industrial Finance Corporation of India Limited, any other financial institution eligible for deduction under section 32(e) or any banking institution, or moneys borrowed or debt incurred in a foreign country for purchase outside India of capital plant and machinery where the tenure is not less than seven years.

Sub-section (6) makes audit a condition for a person other than a company or a co-operative society: the accounts for the year or years in which the expenditure is incurred must have been audited by an accountant before the specified date referred to in section 63, and the audit report must be furnished for the first year in which the deduction is claimed, by the prescribed date, in the prescribed form, duly signed and verified. Sub-sections (7) and (8) deal with transfer of an entitled undertaking of an Indian company before the five years expire — in a scheme of amalgamation to another Indian company, and in a scheme of demerger to another company. In both, the transferor gets no deduction for the year of the amalgamation or demerger, and the section continues to apply to the amalgamated or resulting company as it would have applied to the transferor had the reorganisation not taken place. Sub-section (9) bars a second deduction for the same expenditure under any other provision, for the same or any other tax year.

Why it is there

Expenditure on getting a business off the ground is incurred before there is any business income to set it against, and it is capital in character, so without a special provision it would fall between the ordinary revenue deduction and the depreciation regime. The section answers that by spreading it evenly over five years, and then fences the concession: an exhaustive list of qualifying items, a 5% ceiling tied to the size of the project or the capital raised for it, an audit condition for non-corporate claimants, and a bar on claiming the same amount twice.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Annual instalment of the deductionOne-fifth of the qualifying expenditureFor each of five successive tax yearsSub-section (1)
Number of years over which the expenditure is spreadFive successive tax yearsBeginning with the year the business commences, or the year the extension is completed or the new unit commences production or operationSub-section (1)(i) and (ii)
Ceiling on aggregate qualifying expenditure5%Of the cost of the project; or, where the assessee is an Indian company, at its option, of the capital employed in the business of the companySub-section (4)
Minimum tenure for a foreign borrowing to count as a long-term borrowingNot less than seven yearsMoneys borrowed or debt incurred in a foreign country in respect of the purchase outside India of capital plant and machinerySub-section (5)(c)(ii)
Period within which a transfer triggers sub-sections (7) and (8)Before the expiry of the five years specified in sub-section (1)Transfer of an entitled undertaking of an Indian company in a scheme of amalgamation or of demergerSub-sections (7) and (8)
Audit deadline for a non-company, non-co-operative assesseeBefore the specified date referred to in section 63For the year or years in which the sub-section (2) expenditure is incurred; the report is furnished for the first year of claimSub-section (6)(a)

What this means in practice

The 5% ceiling is applied to the aggregate expenditure before the one-fifth split, so the excess over 5% is lost outright and never enters the five-year run. The choice between cost of the project and capital employed under sub-section (4) belongs to an Indian company alone, and both bases are measured at a fixed date — the last day of the tax year of commencement, or of completion of the extension or start of the new unit — so borrowings raised or assets acquired after that day do not enlarge the base. Sub-section (6) is a condition of admissibility for a non-corporate, non-co-operative assessee, not a filing formality: no audit before the section 63 specified date and no report for the first year of claim means no deduction at all. On a reorganisation, the entitlement does not die but the transferor's share of the year is forfeited — sub-sections (7)(a) and (8)(a) deny the amalgamating or demerged company any deduction for the year of the reorganisation, while the transferee carries on the remaining instalments as if nothing had happened.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An Indian company spends Rs 60 lakh on a feasibility study, project report, drafting of its Memorandum and Articles and prospectus expenses before commencing business, and its cost of the project on the last day of the year of commencement is Rs 8 crore. Sub-section (4) caps the qualifying aggregate at 5% of Rs 8 crore, that is Rs 40 lakh, so Rs 20 lakh is lost. The company deducts one-fifth of Rs 40 lakh, Rs 8 lakh, in each of the five tax years beginning with the year of commencement. If in year three its undertaking is transferred in a scheme of amalgamation to another Indian company, the amalgamating company gets nothing for that year and the amalgamated company takes the remaining instalments.

Where you meet this section

In the computation attached to a return in the first five years of a new business, extension or new unit, and in the prescribed statement of particulars of sub-section (2)(a) expenditure required by sub-section (3). A non-corporate claimant meets it again through the audit report under sub-section (6), which must be furnished for the first year of claim.

The words themselves

the assessee shall be allowed a deduction of an amount equal to one-fifth of such expenditure for each of the five successive tax years
Section 44(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.
The allowable deduction under sub-section (1) in respect of aggregate of expenditure referred to in sub-section (2) shall be restricted to 5%
Section 44(4), Income-tax Act, 2025.
no deduction under sub-section (1) shall be allowed to the amalgamating company for the tax year in which amalgamation takes place
Section 44(7)(a), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Rules that serve this section

Rules of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 that work section 44. Where the rule’s own heading names the section we say so; the rest are marked on reading the rule, which is our derivation and not the department’s. A rule that serves the section silently and that we have missed will not appear here.

All of them are in the Rules 2026 index.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See every circular and notification on this section, or the circulars index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See every circular and notification on this section, or the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 44. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.