VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter IV › Section 43
Chapter IVwas s.43AA

Section 43 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 43 — Taxation of foreign exchange fluctuation. Successor to s.43AA of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 43 is in Chapter IV — Computation of Total Income, which runs from section 13 to section 95.

← Section 42  ·  Section 44 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) provides that, subject to section 42, any gain or loss arising on account of a change in foreign exchange rates on foreign currency transactions is to be treated as income or loss as the case may be, and is to be computed as per the income computation and disclosure standards notified under section 276(2). Sub-section (2) makes that rule apply to all foreign currency transactions and puts four categories beyond argument: monetary and non-monetary items, translation of the financial statements of foreign operations, forward exchange contracts, and foreign currency translation reserves. The section supplies the charge and the pointer; it contains no computation mechanics of its own.

Why it is there

The provision settles that exchange differences are on income account and removes the question of which method of recognising them applies, by routing the computation to the notified income computation and disclosure standards. Listing non-monetary items, foreign operation translations, forward contracts and translation reserves closes off the argument that these are outside the charge.

Who it applies to

What this means in practice

Exchange gains and losses are recognised for tax under the notified standards, not under whatever accounting treatment has been adopted, so the two have to be reconciled and the difference tracked. Because sub-section (2) reaches non-monetary items and foreign currency translation reserves, differences parked in reserves rather than routed through the profit and loss account still have to be tested against the standards. The section itself sets out no method, no rate and no timing rule — those live in the standards notified under section 276(2) — and the whole of sub-section (1) is subject to section 42.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A company with a foreign currency borrowing books a loss of Rs. 4 crore on restatement at the year end, and parks a further Rs. 60 lakh difference arising on translating its overseas branch accounts in a foreign currency translation reserve, arguing that what never passed through the profit and loss account cannot be income or loss at all. Sub-section (2) closes that off: clause (b) brings in translation of the financial statements of foreign operations and clause (d) foreign currency translation reserves, so both differences are within the rule in sub-section (1). What the section will not give is the amount — neither figure stands as booked, because both have to be computed as per the income computation and disclosure standards notified under section 276(2). And the whole of sub-section (1) is subject to section 42, which prevails where the two meet.

Where you meet this section

In the reconciliation between book profit and taxable profit in a company's return, where exchange differences are adjusted, and then in the assessment that tests those adjustments against the income computation and disclosure standards notified under section 276(2). The section itself names no form and no authority.

The words themselves

any gain or loss arising on account of change in foreign exchange rates on foreign currency transactions shall be treated as income or loss, as the case may be, and shall be computed as per the income computation and disclosure standards notified under section 276(2)
Section 43(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 43. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.