VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Act 2025Chapter IV › Section 39
Chapter IVwas s.43

Section 39 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 39 — Computation of actual cost. Successor to s.43 of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 39 is in Chapter IV — Computation of Total Income, which runs from section 13 to section 95.

← Section 38  ·  Section 40 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) fixes the starting point: the actual cost of an asset used for business or profession is the actual cost to the assessee, reduced by four things — any part of the cost met by any other person or authority, directly or indirectly (clause (a)); goods and services tax in respect of which input tax credit has been claimed and allowed (clause (b)); excise duty or additional customs duty under section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 for which credit has been claimed and allowed under the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (clause (c)); and any subsidy, grant or reimbursement relatable to the acquisition of the asset received directly or indirectly from the Central Government, a State Government, any authority established under any law, or any other person (clause (d)).

Sub-section (2) excludes from actual cost any payment, or aggregate of payments, exceeding Rs. 10,000 in a day made to a person for acquisition of the asset or part of it otherwise than by specified banking or online mode.

Sub-section (3) deals with a subsidy, grant or reimbursement that is not directly relatable to the asset: the reduction is worked out from a formula whose terms the section defines — A, the total amount of the subsidy, grant or reimbursement not directly relatable to the asset; B, the cost of the asset whose actual cost is being determined; and C, the cost of all the assets in respect of or in reference to which the subsidy, grant or reimbursement was received.

Sub-section (4) carries a Table of thirteen specified circumstances in column B with the actual cost in column C. Amalgamation (entry 1) and demerger (entry 2) carry the cost forward as if the transferor had continued to hold the asset, with the demerger figure capped at the demerged company's written down value. Inventory converted into a capital asset takes fair market value on the date of conversion, as prescribed (entry 3). Gift or inheritance takes the previous owner's actual cost reduced by depreciation actually allowed for the tax year commencing 1 April 1986 or earlier and depreciation allowable from the tax year commencing on or after 1 April 1987 as if the asset were the only asset in the block (entry 4). A building of the assessee first put to business use during the year takes its actual cost less the depreciation that would have been allowable from acquisition, at the rate in force on the date it was put to use (entry 5). Holding-to-subsidiary and subsidiary-to-holding transfers satisfying section 70(1)(c) or (d) carry the transferor's position forward (entry 6). Reacquisition of an asset the assessee previously used takes the lower of the depreciated original cost and the reacquisition price (entry 7). A sale-and-leaseback back to a previous owner who used it in business and claimed depreciation takes that previous owner's written down value (entry 8). An asset moving from scientific research into the business takes cost less the deduction allowed under section 45(1)(a)(i) or section 35(1)(iv) of the 1961 Act (entry 9). An asset acquired abroad by a non-resident and brought to India takes cost less notional depreciation from acquisition at the rate in force (entry 10). Corporatisation of a recognised stock exchange approved by sebi is ignored (entry 11). Where a section 46 deduction was allowed or allowable, actual cost is deemed nil, and where a section 46 deduction becomes deemed income under section 46(9)(b) the cost is reduced by notional depreciation (entry 12). Interest relatable to any period after the asset is first put to use is excluded (entry 13).

Sub-section (5) overrides the whole Table except entry 8: where the asset was used by another person for his business before the acquisition and the Assessing Officer is satisfied that the main purpose of the transfer was to reduce tax liability by claiming depreciation on an enhanced actual cost, the actual cost is such amount as the Assessing Officer determines having regard to all the circumstances. Sub-section (6) requires that determination to be made with the prior approval of the Joint Commissioner. Sub-section (7) defines "special modes of acquisition" for entry 12 as acquisition by gift, will or irrevocable trust, on distribution on liquidation of a company, or by a transfer referred to in section 70(1)(a), (c), (d), (e), (j), (zd), (ze) and (zf).

Why it is there

Depreciation runs off actual cost, so every rupee added to actual cost is a deduction claimed over the life of the asset. The section therefore strips out what the assessee did not really bear — another person's contribution, credited tax, a subsidy — and blocks the two classic ways of inflating the base: paying in cash and routing a used asset through a transfer at a written-up price. The Table then answers the recurring question of what cost to use when the asset arrives other than by an ordinary purchase.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Cash payment excluded from actual costPayment or aggregate of payments exceeding Rs. 10,000 in a dayMade to a person for acquisition of the asset or part of it in a mode otherwise than by specified banking or online modeSub-section (2)
Depreciation deducted from the previous owner's cost on gift or inheritanceDepreciation actually allowed for the tax year commencing 1 April 1986 or earlier, plus depreciation allowable from the tax year commencing on or after 1 April 1987Computed as if the asset were the only asset in the relevant block of assetsSub-section (4), Table Sl. No. 4
Cap on the actual cost to a resulting company in a demergerShall not exceed the written down value of the asset in the hands of the demerged companyCapital asset transferred by a demerged company to a resulting company being an Indian company in a demergerSub-section (4), Table Sl. No. 2
Actual cost on reacquisition of an asset previously used by the assesseeThe lower of the depreciated original actual cost and the actual reacquisition priceAsset previously belonged to the assessee and had been used by him for business or professionSub-section (4), Table Sl. No. 7
Actual cost where a section 46 deduction was allowed or allowableNilDeduction allowed or allowable to the assessee, or to a person from whom the assessee acquires the asset through a special mode of acquisition defined in sub-section (7)Sub-section (4), Table Sl. No. 12(a)
Interest excluded from actual costSo much of the interest as is relatable to any period after the asset is first put to useAmount paid or payable as interest in connection with the acquisition of the assetSub-section (4), Table Sl. No. 13

What this means in practice

Work in order: take the price, apply the four reductions in sub-section (1), knock out any day's cash payments over Rs. 10,000 under sub-section (2), and only then ask whether the acquisition falls in one of the thirteen Table circumstances — because most of those entries replace the price altogether with a carried-forward or depreciated figure. Two traps sit in the Table. Entry 13 does not disallow acquisition interest; it splits it at the date the asset is first put to use, so pre-use interest stays in cost and post-use interest does not. Entry 12(a) reduces actual cost to nil where a section 46 deduction was allowed or allowable — and "allowable" is enough, so a deduction that could have been claimed by the assessee or by the person he acquired from through a special mode still empties the cost. Finally, sub-section (5) is a live override on everything except entry 8: if the asset had been used in someone else's business and the Assessing Officer finds the main purpose of the transfer was depreciation on an enhanced cost, he substitutes his own figure, and the only procedural protection is the Joint Commissioner's prior approval under sub-section (6).

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

A company buys plant for Rs. 1 crore, receives a Rs. 15 lakh State Government subsidy relatable to that acquisition, claims and is allowed input tax credit of Rs. 8 lakh on it, and pays Rs. 40,000 of the price in cash on a single day. Actual cost is Rs. 1 crore less Rs. 15 lakh under sub-section (1)(d), less Rs. 8 lakh under sub-section (1)(b), less the Rs. 40,000 excluded by sub-section (2) — Rs. 76.6 lakh — and depreciation runs on that figure. If the subsidy had instead been a single Rs. 15 lakh grant covering several assets and not directly relatable to this one, the reduction would be worked out under sub-section (3) from A, B and C rather than by deducting the whole grant here.

Where you meet this section

You meet it in the depreciation working attached to a return and in the assessment order that disturbs it — most often as a proposal to reduce the block's opening cost for a subsidy or credited tax, or as a sub-section (5) determination substituting the Assessing Officer's figure for the price you paid, which must carry the Joint Commissioner's prior approval.

The words themselves

The payment or aggregate of payments exceeding Rs. 10,000 in a day for acquisition of an asset or part thereof, made to a person in a mode otherwise than by specified banking or online mode, shall be excluded from the actual cost of that asset.
Section 39(2), Income-tax Act, 2025.
Actual cost shall not include so much of such amount as is relatable to any period after such asset is first put to use.
Section 39(4), Table Sl. No. 13, Income-tax Act, 2025.
the Assessing Officer is satisfied that the main purpose of the transfer of the asset, directly or indirectly, was to reduce tax liability (by claiming depreciation on enhanced actual cost)
Section 39(5)(b), Income-tax Act, 2025.
The determination of actual cost under sub-section (5) shall be made with the prior approval of the Joint Commissioner.
Section 39(6), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See every circular and notification on this section, or the circulars index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See every circular and notification on this section, or the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 39. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.