Sub-section (1) sets out the notice that must precede a reassessment. Clause (a) requires the Assessing Officer, before making an assessment, reassessment or recomputation under section 279 and subject to section 281, to issue a notice to the assessee along with a copy of the order passed under section 281(3). Clause (b) requires that notice to call on the assessee to furnish, within the period specified in it, a return of his income or of the income of another person in respect of whom he is assessable for the relevant tax year. Clause (c), as substituted by Act No. 4 of 2026 with effect from 1 April 2026, provides that the period specified in the notice shall not be less than thirty days from the date of the notice and shall not exceed three months from the end of the month in which the notice is issued; before that substitution the clause carried only the three-month outer limit and no minimum.
Sub-section (2) requires that return to be furnished in the prescribed form and verification, and applies the Act to it as if it were a return required under section 263. Sub-section (3) provides that a return furnished after the expiry of the period specified in the notice shall not be deemed to be a return under section 263.
Sub-section (4) bars the notice unless there is information with the Assessing Officer which suggests that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment in the assessee's case for the relevant tax year. Sub-section (5) requires the prior approval of the specified authority where the Assessing Officer has received information under the scheme notified under section 260, directions from the Approving Panel under section 274(6), or any finding or direction in an order passed by any authority, Tribunal or court in a proceeding under the Act by way of appeal, reference or revision, or by a Court in a proceeding under any other law.
Sub-section (6) defines, for this section and section 281, what counts as information suggesting escapement: information as per the risk management strategy formulated by the Board; an audit objection that the assessment was not made as per the Act; information received under an agreement referred to in section 159; information made available under the scheme notified under section 260; information requiring action in consequence of an order of a Tribunal or Court; information emanating from a survey under section 253 other than under sub-section (4) of that section; directions of the Approving Panel under section 274(6); and a finding or direction in an order of any authority, Tribunal or court in a proceeding under the Act or in a Court proceeding under any other law.
Why it is there
Reopening a completed assessment is the Department's most disruptive power, and this section is the gate to it. It requires the officer to have information of a defined kind before he issues a notice, to hand the assessee the section 281(3) order that shows why the case was taken up, to obtain a superior's approval in the categories where the trigger comes from outside the officer's own file, and to give a minimum and a maximum period for the response.
Who it applies to
An assessee whose income for a tax year is alleged to have escaped assessment
A person assessable in respect of another person's income for the relevant tax year
The Assessing Officer issuing the notice
The specified authority whose prior approval is required under sub-section (5)
The figures, and what each one turns on
Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
What
Figure
The condition on it
Where
Minimum period to be allowed in the notice
Not less than thirty days from the date of the notice
Inserted by the substitution of clause (c) by Act No. 4 of 2026 with effect from 1 April 2026; the pre-substitution clause had no minimum
Sub-section (1)(c)
Maximum period that may be allowed in the notice
Not exceeding three months from the end of the month in which the notice is issued
Applies to the period specified for furnishing the return under sub-section (1)(b)
Sub-section (1)(c)
What this means in practice
The notice period is now bracketed at both ends: at least thirty days from the date of the notice, and no later than three months from the end of the month of issue. That floor is new — clause (c) as it stood before the substitution by Act No. 4 of 2026 fixed only the outer limit, so an officer could specify a very short period. Filing late is worse than it looks: sub-section (3) says a return furnished after the specified period is not deemed to be a return under section 263 at all, so the return is not treated as a section 263 return for the consequences that follow from that character. Two documents must arrive together — the notice and a copy of the section 281(3) order — because clause (1)(a) requires the notice to be issued along with it. Sub-section (4) makes information a jurisdictional precondition, and sub-section (6) is a closed list of what qualifies, so a notice is open to challenge if the trigger falls outside it. Approval under sub-section (5) is required only for the three categories that sub-section names, not for every notice.
An example
Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.
An Assessing Officer issues a section 280 notice on 12 May 2026 after an audit objection under sub-section (6)(b). The period he specifies must give the assessee at least thirty days from 12 May and cannot run beyond 31 August 2026 — three months from the end of May. If the assessee files on 5 September, sub-section (3) means that return is not deemed to be a return under section 263, whatever else it may be worth.
Where you meet this section
This is the reassessment notice itself, delivered with a copy of the order passed under section 281(3) — for most taxpayers it is the document in their hand when they look the section up. The grounds for it are traced through sub-sections (4) and (6), and the approval requirement in sub-section (5) is often the first thing checked when the notice is contested.
The words themselves
the period specified in the notice referred to in clause (a) shall not be less than thirty days from the date of such notice but shall not exceed three months from the end of the month in which such notice is issued.
Section 280(1)(c), as substituted by Act No. 4 of 2026 w.e.f. 1-4-2026, Income-tax Act, 2025.
Any return of income required to be furnished under sub-section (1), furnished after the expiry of the period specified in the notice under the said sub-section, shall not be deemed to be a return under section 263.
Section 280(3), Income-tax Act, 2025.
No notice under this section shall be issued unless there is information with the Assessing Officer which suggests that the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment in the case of the assessee for the relevant tax year.
Section 280(4), Income-tax Act, 2025.
the Assessing Officer shall, subject to the provisions of section 281, issue a notice to the assessee, along with a copy of the order passed under section 281(3)
Section 280(1)(a), Income-tax Act, 2025.
What people get wrong
Accepting a notice period shorter than thirty days. As substituted by Act No. 4 of 2026 with effect from 1 April 2026, clause (1)(c) requires not less than thirty days from the date of the notice; the earlier clause set only the three-month outer limit.
Measuring the three months from the date of the notice. Clause (1)(c) measures it from the end of the month in which the notice is issued.
Assuming a late return still counts as a section 263 return. Sub-section (3) says a return furnished after the specified period shall not be deemed to be a return under section 263.
Treating prior approval as needed for every notice. Sub-section (5) requires it only where the Assessing Officer has received information under the section 260 scheme, Approving Panel directions under section 274(6), or a finding or direction in an order of an authority, Tribunal or court.
Overlooking the enclosure. Clause (1)(a) requires the notice to be issued along with a copy of the order passed under section 281(3).
Treating any material as sufficient information. Sub-section (6) defines what counts, and a survey under section 253(4) is expressly excluded by clause (f).
What this replaced, and what changed
1961 provision
What changed in the move
s.148
1. The time limit moves by a full year. Under s.149 of the 1961 Act no s.148 notice could issue after three years and three months from the end of the relevant assessment year, or after five years and three months in the fifty-lakh cases. Under s.282 of the 2025 Act the corresponding limits are four years and three months and six years and three months. The fifty-lakh threshold and the 'books of account or other documents or evidence' condition are unchanged. 2. S.282(3) adds an embargo that has no 1961 counterpart: no notice under s.280 or s.281 within one year from the end of any tax year. 3. Two new categories of qualifying information are added - directions of the Approving Panel under s.274(6) (the GAAR route) and any finding or direction contained in an appellate, revisional or court order, whether under this Act or any other law: s.280(6)(g) and (h). 4. The requirement of prior approval of the specified authority widens from one situation (information under the notified scheme) to three, the two new ones being an Approving Panel direction and a court or appellate finding: s.280(5)(b) and (c). 5. The 1961 survey limb was confined to surveys 'on or after the 1st day of September, 2024'; s.280(6)(f) drops the date and simply refers to a survey under s.253 other than sub-section (4). 6. The thirty-day floor and three-month ceiling for the return period are unchanged in substance but are now a free-standing clause (1)(c) rather than words embedded in the notice-issuing sentence.
How we established this. Read s.280 of the 2025 Act against s.148 of the 1961 Act. The marginal headings are word for word the same, 'Issue of notice where income has escaped assessment'. The opening sentence is the same sentence: 1961 - 'Before making the assessment, reassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Assessing Officer shall, subject to the provisions of section 148A, issue a notice to the assessee, along with a copy of the order passed under sub-section (3) of section 148A, requiring him to furnish, within such period as may be specified in the notice, not being less than thirty days from the date of such notice but not exceeding three months from the end of the month in which such notice is issued, a return of his income'; 2025 splits the same sentence into clauses (a), (b) and (c) of sub-section (1) with s.279 for s.147 and s.281 for s.148A. S.148(2) and its proviso (return treated as a s.139 return; a late one not so treated) become s.280(2) and (3) with s.263 substituted. The first proviso to s.148(1) becomes s.280(4) in identical words. The second proviso (prior approval where information came under the s.135A scheme) becomes s.280(5)(a) with s.260 substituted. S.148(3), which defines 'information which suggests that the income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment' in six clauses, is reproduced as s.280(6) with the same first five clauses in the same order and the same wording.
Rules that serve this section
Rules of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 that work section 280. Where the rule’s own heading names the section we say so; the rest are marked on reading the rule, which is our derivation and not the department’s. A rule that serves the section silently and that we have missed will not appear here.
Rule 164 — Forms, eligibility, verification etc. in respect of return of income — on reading the rule
A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.
Circular No. 451 — Clarifications on issues relating to effect of filing higher estimates of income for advance tax purposes on assessments for earl 1986-02-17
Circular No. 331 — Section 89 l Relief When Salary ETC., Is Paid in Arrears or in Advance 1982-03-22
A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.
Notification No. 09/2012 — Section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Return of Income - Exemption to specified persons from requirement of furnishing a retur 2012-02-17
Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 280. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.
ACIT v Dhariya Construction CoSupreme CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The only thing behind my reopening notice is the Valuation Officer's report. Is that enough?
ACIT v Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers P LtdSupreme CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 My return was only processed under 143(1). Does that stop the department reopening it later?
CIT v Alagendran Finance LtdSupreme CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 A reassessment was done in between. Does the two-year clock for s.263 restart from it?
CIT v Chhabil Dass AgarwalSupreme CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 Can I go straight to the High Court against an income-tax order instead of filing the statutory appeal?
CIT v Kelvinator of India LtdSupreme CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The officer looked at this exact issue in the original assessment and now wants to look again. Can he?
CIT v S. Goyanka Lime & Chemical LtdSupreme CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 Is 'Yes, I am satisfied' enough for the sanctioning authority to write?
CIT v Sun Engineering Works (P) LtdSupreme CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 Since the assessment is open again, can you use the reassessment to raise claims you missed the first time?
Calcutta Discount Co Ltd v ITOSupreme CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 How much am I actually required to disclose — and can they reopen because the officer drew the wrong conclusion?
Chhugamal Rajpal v S.P. ChalihaSupreme CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The sanctioning authority just wrote 'yes' and signed. Is that a sanction?
Dy CIT v Mastech Technologies P LtdSupreme CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 The AO who issued my 148 notice was transferred and his successor issued another. Is the reassessment time-barred?
GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd v ITOSupreme CourtCuts both waystagged s.148 You get a s.148 notice. Can you ask why — and must the officer answer?
ITO v Lakhmani Mewal DasSupreme CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 How strong does the officer's material have to be before he can reopen?
ITO v TechSpan India (P) LtdSupreme CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 What actually counts as a 'change of opinion'?
ITO v Tej Partap SinghSupreme CourtCuts both waystagged s.148 The High Court quashed my s.148 notice because the ward officer issued it instead of the faceless unit. Does that judgment still stand?
K.P. Varghese v ITOSupreme CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The AO says I sold below market value and wants to tax the difference. Can he do that?
Kishinchand Chellaram v CITSupreme CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 They have a letter from a bank that you have never seen. Can they use it against you?
Mangalam Publications v CITSupreme CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 You filed without books because they were seized. Is that a failure to disclose?
Mansarovar Commercial P Ltd v CITSupreme CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 My company is registered outside the taxable territory but run from Delhi. Where is it resident?
New Delhi Television Ltd v DCITSupreme CourtCuts both waystagged s.148 Reopening beyond four years — how much are you actually required to have disclosed?
PCIT v Abhisar Buildwell P LtdSupreme CourtCuts both waystagged s.148 Search assessment for a year already completed, but nothing incriminating was found. Can the officer still add?
PCIT v NRA Iron & Steel P LtdSupreme CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 How far do I have to go to prove share capital or a loan is genuine?
Price Waterhouse Coopers Pvt Ltd v CITSupreme CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 You forgot to add back something your own audit report flagged. Is that concealment?
Raj Dadarkar & Associates v ACITSupreme CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 Our deed says sub-letting is our business. Does that make the licence fees business income?
Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd v ITOSupreme CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 The department says the court will not look at whether its reasons are any good. Is that really the test at the reopening stage?
Sasi Enterprises v ACITSupreme CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 The firm never filed its returns and the assessments were made under s.144. Can we get the s.276CC complaint discharged because the assessment was…
Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd v ITOSupreme CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 My society invested surplus funds in short-term bank deposits. Is that interest covered by 80P?
Union of India v Ashish AgarwalSupreme CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 What happened to the thousands of s.148 notices issued under the old rules after the law changed in 2021?
Union of India v Rajeev BansalSupreme CourtCuts both waystagged s.148 Your notice was issued in the 1 April to 30 June 2021 window. Was it saved by tola, or is it dead?
Ankit Agarwal v PCCITHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 My 148A notice says I never filed a return, but I did. Is that enough to get it quashed?
Asha Dubey v Union of IndiaHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 They issued a 148 notice in my late husband's name. Can they just issue a fresh one now?
Bharat Electronics Employees Co-op Credit Society v CCITHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 Our co-operative credit society filed its return late and lost the section 80P deduction under section 80AC. The Chief Commissioner has rejected our…
Biswajit Deb v Union of IndiaHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The recorded reasons admit the AO had no time to verify my transactions. Is the reopening valid?
CIT v Jet Airways (I) LtdHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The officer dropped the very issue he reopened for, then taxed something else instead. Is that allowed?
CIT v Sardari Lal & CoHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 Can the CIT(A) enhance my assessment by taxing a source the AO never looked at?
Champa Impex P Ltd v Union of IndiaHigh CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 The AO made no enquiry before issuing my 148A(b) notice. Does that kill the reopening?
Charu Chains & Jewels (P) Ltd v ACITHigh CourtCuts both waystagged s.148 The s.148A(b) notice refers to information the officer never showed you. Can you insist on seeing it?
Chooharmal Wadhuram v CITHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The officer served the reassessment notice on only one of my late father's several heirs. Is the assessment on the estate good?
Chotanagpur Diocesan Trust v Union of IndiaHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 My 148A(b) notice describes an enquiry but nothing was attached. Can I insist on the material?
Daujee Abhushan Bhandar P Ltd v UOIHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The s.148 notice was digitally signed on 31 March but the e-mail only went on 6 April. Was it issued in time?
Deepak Extrusions P Ltd v DCITHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The Addl. CIT gave the AO a s.144A direction. Does that let him skip a speaking order on my objections?
Dr Mathew Cherian v ACITHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 I'm a consultant doctor at a hospital. Can the AO reopen and tax my fees as salary?
FCS Manufacturing (India) Pvt Ltd v DDITHigh CourtCuts both waystagged s.148 Your bank accounts are provisionally attached and the business cannot operate. Is there a way out short of paying?
Hexaware Technologies Ltd v ACITHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 Your s.148 notice came from your own local officer, not from the faceless unit. Does that matter?
IDFC Ltd v Dy CITHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The officer is reopening beyond three years and counting a disallowance of expenditure towards the fifty lakh figure in section 149(1)(b). Is a…
Kanubhai M Patel HUF v Hiren BhattHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 My s.148 notice is dated 31 March but the post office booked it on 7 April. Which date does s.149 test?
Meet Lalwani v ITOHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 I filed the death certificate and they still issued the 148 notice in my mother's name. Is it valid?
PCIT v Colo Colour P LtdHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The AO added 12.5 per cent of my alleged bogus purchases and I agreed to it to close the matter. Can he now levy penalty under section 271(1)(c)?
PCIT v DSG Papers (P) LtdHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The addition rests on statements of ex-employees and third parties I was never allowed to question. Is the assessment good?
PCIT v Drisha Impex (P) LtdHigh CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 The Tribunal gave me a small percentage addition on disputed purchases. Can the department get the whole disallowance back on appeal?
PCIT v Jai Shiv Shankar TradersHigh Courttagged s.148 If the assessee says its original return should be treated as the return in response to s.148, must the Assessing Officer still issue a fresh…
PCIT v Kanak Impex (India) LtdHigh CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 The officer says my purchases are accommodation entries. Can he add the whole purchase, or only a percentage?
PCIT v Meenakshi Overseas Pvt LtdHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The reasons recorded just repeat what the Investigation Wing said. Is that enough to reopen?
PCIT v Rajesh Suresh ChopraHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 If an estimate on the disputed purchases cannot be avoided, is there a High Court figure I can point to?
Parmesh Chand Yadav v ITOHigh CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 The AO has issued a s.148A notice on crypto exchange data showing Rs 4.65 crore of transactions. I have given my bank statements and my return — is…
Rahul Sachan v ITOHigh CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 The s.148A(d) order does not answer my objections at all. Is that enough on its own to get the reassessment notice quashed?
Rajesh Somandas Sachdev v ITOHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 I filed my return only after the section 148 notice and after the prosecution complaint had already been lodged. Does the section 276CC proviso still…
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd v CITHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 Same point, in Delhi: if the recorded grounds fail, can the officer still tax an unrelated item?
Sanjay Kumar Bijay Kumar v PCITHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The same cash deposits were already reassessed and accepted at nil. Can they reopen them again?
Sapphire Foods India Ltd v ACITHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The officer has reopened my scrutiny assessment because the audit party disagreed with what he allowed. Is that a fresh look or a change of opinion?
Sevensea Vincom P Ltd v PCITHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 They reopened AY 2016-17 in 2022 for under Rs 50 lakh. Is the notice time-barred?
Siemens Financial Services Pvt Ltd v DCITHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 Beyond three years, who has to approve the reopening — and what if the wrong officer signed?
Sonansh Creations P Ltd v ACITHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The officer says I took accommodation entries and I say I received nothing. Must he have material that the entries exist before he reopens?
Suman Jeet Agarwal v ITOHigh CourtCuts both waystagged s.148 The department says my section 148 notice was issued on 31 March because the itba screen shows it was generated that day, but the e-mail only reached…
Susai Amalanathan Antoni Vincent v ITOHigh CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 Can I get a s.148A order set aside on the ground that the 'information' did not come through the Risk Management Strategy?
T R Balasubramanium v ACITHigh CourtHelps taxpayertagged s.148 I received a flat when my company was wound up, paid capital gains tax then, and sold it in the same year. What is my cost?
T.K.S. Builders P Ltd v ITOHigh CourtHelps departmenttagged s.148 Can the jurisdictional AO issue my s.148 notice, or must reassessment go through the faceless route?
Ankit Gems (P) Ltd v ITOITATHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The officer says I took accommodation entries from a party I have never dealt with. What do I actually have to do?
Diach Chemicals and Pigments P Ltd v DCITITATHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The department says my purchases are bogus. Do the suppliers' returns and the input credit allowed on those invoices count for anything in the…
Haresh Ghanshyamdas Makhija v ITOITATHelps taxpayertagged s.148 They already penalised me under 271A for keeping no books. Can they levy 271B on top?
ITO v Raj Kumar ParasharITATHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The AO substituted the circle rate under s.50C. Does that higher figure also become the net consideration I have to reinvest for s.54F?
ITO v Ratna AggarwalITATHelps taxpayertagged s.148 Property came to me under a family settlement but the instrument was a gift deed. Is that taxable under s.56(2)?
Meena Vaswani v ACITITATHelps departmenttagged s.148 What evidence does the department actually need before it will accept hra on rent paid to my mother?
Pankil Garg v PCITITATHelps taxpayertagged s.148 I received money from my HUF. Is it taxable because an HUF is not my 'relative'?
Rabin Arup Mukerjea v ITOITATHelps taxpayertagged s.148 (raised but expressly left undecided as academic) My step-sister gifted me a flat. Can the department tax it because we are not blood relations?
Santosh Kumar v ITOITATHelps taxpayertagged s.148 The AO has taxed my entire cash deposit as undisclosed income. Can he be made to tax only the presumptive percentage of it instead?
e-Verification Instruction 2(i) of 2024CBDTCuts both waystagged s.148 A compliance campaign message arrived and nothing was done about it. What does the department do next, and does an updated return filed late in the…
s.276CC: prosecution for not filing the returntagged s.148 A s.276CC notice has come for a year where the return went in late. What actually has to be shown, and does the proviso save me?
What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.