VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Income-tax Act 2025 › Chapter XIV › Section 248
Chapter XIVwas s.132A

Section 248 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 248 — Powers to requisition. Successor to s.132A of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 248 is in Chapter XIV — Tax Administration, which runs from section 236 to section 261.

← Section 247  ·  Section 249 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) allows the approving authority, on information in his possession, to authorise a requisition in three situations: where a person served with a summons under section 131(1) or a notice under section 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or a summons under section 246(1) or notice under section 268(1) of this Act, has failed to produce books, documents or electronic information and those records or the computer system holding them have been taken into custody by an officer or authority under another law; where such records will be useful for or relevant to a proceeding under either Act and the person would not produce them if they were returned to him; or where assets taken into custody by an officer or authority under another law represent, wholly or partly, income or property not disclosed or that would not have been disclosed. The authorisation goes to a Joint Director, Joint Commissioner, Assistant Director, Assistant Commissioner or Income-tax Officer, called the requisitioning officer, to require the custodian officer or authority to deliver the assets, books, documents or computer system to him. Sub-section (2) obliges that officer or authority to deliver them either forthwith or when it considers retention no longer necessary. Sub-section (3) then imports the search machinery: sections 247(4)(b), 247(7) to (11), 250 and 251 apply as if the material had been seized under section 247 by the requisitioning officer, reading "the requisitioning officer" for "the authorised officer".

Why it is there

Where records or assets are already lawfully in the hands of another agency, a search would be pointless and a summons futile; this section lets the department take delivery of them instead. Sub-section (3) exists so that a requisition is not a lesser process — once delivered, the material is treated as if seized in a search, with the same rules on retention, application of assets and presumptions.

Who it applies to

What this means in practice

If your books, records or assets are in the custody of another agency, they can be handed over to the income-tax department on a requisition without any fresh search at your premises, and you get no separate opportunity to resist the delivery — the obligation in sub-section (2) is on the custodian, not on you. The other agency need not hand them over at once; it may keep them until it considers retention unnecessary. Once delivered, treat the position as if there had been a seizure under section 247: the retention rules, the application of seized assets under section 250 and the presumptions in section 251 all apply, with the requisitioning officer standing in the place of the authorised officer. Note that clause (b) can be invoked prospectively, on the basis of a summons or notice that "might be issued".

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

Another agency, investigating a person under a different law, has taken his ledgers and a server into custody, and he had already failed to produce them on a summons issued under section 246(1). Rather than searching him again, the approving authority, on information in his possession, authorises an Income-tax Officer as requisitioning officer to require that agency to deliver the books and the computer system. The person himself has no separate say, because the obligation in sub-section (2) runs against the custodian, and the custodian need not act at once — it may deliver forthwith or when it forms the opinion that retention is no longer necessary. Once delivered, sub-section (3) treats the material as if it had been seized under section 247 by the requisitioning officer, so the retention rules, the application of assets under section 250 and the presumptions in section 251 all apply.

Where you meet this section

You meet it through the requisition itself and, more often, through what follows — material held by another agency appearing in your income-tax proceedings with the section 251 presumptions attached to it. The authorities named are the approving authority, who authorises, and the requisitioning officer, who must be a Joint Director, Joint Commissioner, Assistant Director, Assistant Commissioner or Income-tax Officer.

The words themselves

the approving authority may authorise any, Joint Director or Joint Commissioner or Assistant Director or Assistant Commissioner or Income-tax Officer (herein and in section 489(2) referred to as the requisitioning officer) to require the officer or authority referred to in clause (a) or (b) or (c), to deliver such assets or books of account or other documents, or computer system containing such information to the requisitioning officer
Section 248(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Rules that serve this section

Rules of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 that work section 248. Where the rule’s own heading names the section we say so; the rest are marked on reading the rule, which is our derivation and not the department’s. A rule that serves the section silently and that we have missed will not appear here.

All of them are in the Rules 2026 index.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 248. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.