VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Income-tax Act 2025 › Chapter XII › Section 185
Chapter XIIwas s.269SS

Section 185 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

Section 185 — Mode of taking or accepting certain loans, deposits and specified sum. Successor to s.269SS of the 1961 Act.

Where this section sits

Section 185 is in Chapter XII — Mode of Payment in Certain Cases etc., which runs from section 185 to section 189.

← Section 184  ·  Section 186 →

What this section does

Sub-section (1) prohibits any person from taking or accepting from another person any loan, deposit or specified sum otherwise than through an account payee cheque, an account payee bank draft, an electronic clearing system through a bank account, or any other prescribed electronic mode. It bites where any of three amounts is Rs. 20000 or more: the amount or aggregate amount being taken; the amount or aggregate amount previously taken from that same person and remaining unpaid on that date, whether or not due for repayment; or the aggregate of both.

Sub-section (2) lifts the prohibition where the counterparty is the Government, a banking company, post office savings bank or co-operative bank, a corporation established by a Central, State or Provincial Act, a Government company under section 2(45) of the Companies Act, 2013, or a notified institution, association or body. Sub-section (3) lifts it where both parties have agricultural income and neither has any income chargeable to tax under the Act. Sub-section (4) substitutes Rs. 200000 for Rs. 20000 where a deposit is accepted by a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank from its member, or a member takes a loan from such a society or bank. Sub-section (5) confines "loan or deposit" to one of money.

Why it is there

Cash loans and deposits leave no trail, and are the standard way of introducing unaccounted money into a set of books and of manufacturing an explanation for a credit after the fact. Requiring the money to move through an account payee instrument or a bank channel makes both sides verifiable. The aggregation limbs exist because the rule would otherwise be defeated by splitting one loan into several receipts.

Who it applies to

The figures, and what each one turns on

Read the condition in the same row. A figure quoted without it is a wrong answer with a citation attached.
WhatFigureThe condition on itWhere
Threshold at which the banking-channel requirement appliesRs. 20000 or moreTested against the amount being taken, the unpaid amount of earlier loans, deposits or specified sums from the same person, or the aggregate of the twoSub-section (1), closing words with clauses (i) to (iii)
Substituted threshold for a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bankRs. 200000Substituted for Rs. 20000 where such a society or bank accepts a deposit from its member, or a member takes a loan from itSub-section (4)(a) and (b)

What this means in practice

The threshold is not per transaction. Clause (ii) brings in earlier loans, deposits or specified sums from the same person still unpaid on the date of the new receipt, whether or not due, and clause (iii) aggregates them with the fresh amount — so a Rs. 5000 cash receipt from a person already owed Rs. 40000 is caught. The permitted modes are a closed list, and a cheque that is not account payee is not among them. The exemptions in sub-section (2) turn on the identity of the counterparty, and sub-section (3) is narrow: both parties must have agricultural income and neither any income chargeable under the Act. The Rs. 200000 figure is confined to the two named kinds of society and bank and to their members.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the rule biting, not taken from any real matter.

An individual owes a friend Rs. 40000 on an old unsecured loan and takes a further Rs. 5000 from him in cash. Sub-section (1)(ii) looks at the unpaid Rs. 40000, and clause (iii) at the aggregate of Rs. 45000, so the fresh receipt had to come through an account payee cheque, account payee bank draft, electronic clearing system or a prescribed electronic mode even though it was only Rs. 5000. Had it been a deposit accepted by a primary agricultural credit society from its member, the threshold would read as Rs. 200000.

Where you meet this section

You meet this section when a cash credit or unsecured loan shows up in the books during a scrutiny or survey and the Assessing Officer asks how the money moved. It is a prohibition, not a filing requirement; the consequence of breaching it comes through the penalty provisions of the Act.

The words themselves

No person shall take or accept from another person any loan or deposit or specified sum, except through—
Section 185(1), Income-tax Act, 2025.
the amount or the aggregate amount of any previously taken or accepted loan or deposit or specified sum by such person from such another person, which is remaining unpaid, whether due for repayment or not
Section 185(1)(ii), Income-tax Act, 2025.

What people get wrong

What this replaced

The correspondence is the Income Tax Department’s own, from its comparison utility for the 1961 and 2025 Acts. A renumbering is the easy half; whether the words changed is the half that decides cases.

See the full 1961 to 2025 concordance.

Rules that serve this section

Rules of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 that work section 185. Where the rule’s own heading names the section we say so; the rest are marked on reading the rule, which is our derivation and not the department’s. A rule that serves the section silently and that we have missed will not appear here.

All of them are in the Rules 2026 index.

Circulars of the Board on this section

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. Every one below was written under the 1961 Act; it reaches this section because the department’s own concordance carries the provision it names to this one.

See the circulars index.

Notifications that reach this section

A notification is made under a power the Act gives and, within that power, is law. These too were made under the 1961 Act and are placed here by the department’s concordance.

See the notifications index.

Case law carried across

Read this before you rely on it. Every decision below was decided under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It appears here because it is tagged to a 1961 provision that the department’s own mapping carries to section 185. That is an inference we have drawn, not a holding on the new section: where the words changed in the move, the reasoning may not survive. Treat this as the place to start looking, not as authority on the 2025 Act.

Explainers

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the section. Everything above was written from the section’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here, and nothing here is advice on your facts. Where a figure matters, read the sub-section it comes from.