Section 80P(2)(a)(i)

Section 80P(2)(a)(i) — the law in short

What the courts have decided on section 80P(2)(a)(i), in one screen. Read this first; open an entry when you need the facts, the reasoning and the source.

• KSCARDB v Assessing Officer Supreme CourtHelps taxpayer
  We are a state-level co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. Does 80P(4) block our deduction?
  No. The appellant is an apex co-operative society providing credit to its member societies, not a 'co-operative bank' within s.80P(4) read with the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, so the deduction under s.80P(2)(a)(i) is available.
• Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd v CIT Supreme CourtHelps taxpayer
  My society lends to non-members too. Does that wipe out its 80P(2)(a)(i) deduction?
  No. The deduction stands: the society need not lend only for agricultural purposes, and lending to non-members does not disentitle it — only the profits from non-member loans fall outside the deduction. Section 80P(4) shuts out only co-operative banks licensed to carry on banking business.
• Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd v ACIT Supreme CourtHelps departmentPartly overruled — read this first
  The AO cites Citizen Co-operative Society to deny my 80P claim. How far does it go?
  Only as far as mutuality. The society there lost because its 'nominal members' were not members in law, the contributors to the surplus and the participants in it were not the same body, and it was in substance running a finance business outside the statute under which it was registered.
• Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd v ITO Supreme CourtHelps department
  My society invested surplus funds in short-term bank deposits. Is that interest covered by 80P?
  No. Interest on surplus funds not required for immediate business use is not attributable to providing credit to members or to marketing their produce. It is income from other sources under s.56 and outside s.80P(2)(a)(i).
• CIT v Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd Supreme CourtCuts both ways
  I got a government incentive that came to me as a higher free sale quota and an excise rebate, and I had to use it to repay my term loans. Is that taxable income?
  No, on those terms it is a capital receipt. The Supreme Court applied the purpose test: what decides the character of a subsidy is the object for which it is given, not when it is paid, where it comes from, or the mechanism through which it reaches you. Because the incentive was available only to new or substantially expanded units and had to be used to repay term loans taken to set up or expand the plant, it was capital, not a trade receipt. On the separate section 80P(2)(a)(i) claim the matters went back to the Tribunal.
• Bannanje Grahakara Vividhoddesha Sahakara Sangha Ltd v CIT (Appeals), NFAC High CourtCuts both ways
  The Tribunal remanded the nominal member issue to the Assessing Officer but recorded findings on the merits while doing so, leaving the officer nothing to decide. Is there anything I can do about that in the High Court?
  Yes. The Karnataka High Court declined to interfere with the order of remand itself, but accepted that the Tribunal's observations on the merits might prejudice the assessee and clarified that the remand proceedings are to be considered independently, uninfluenced by any observations or findings recorded by the Tribunal on merits, strictly in accordance with Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank and having regard to the relevant provisions of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act.
• K.2058 Saravanampatti Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Ltd v ITO High CourtHelps taxpayer
  The Assessing Officer taxed our interest on deposits under s.56 by simply citing Totgars, without answering our case that the deposits are a statutory reserve we are obliged to maintain and that the interest we paid on borrowings should be netted against it. Is that order sustainable?
  No. The Madras High Court set aside the assessments as non-speaking and passed without application of mind, holding it a fatal flaw that the Assessing Officer had brushed aside, in a single line, the society's arguments that the deposits were a statutory reserve and not surplus funds, that Nawanshahar Central Cooperative Bank applied, and that at worst the interest received should be netted against the interest paid. The Court expressed no opinion on the merits and remanded for a speaking order.
• Lalitamba Pattina Souharda Sahakari Niyamita v ITO High CourtHelps taxpayer
  The Tribunal refused my society's s.80P(2)(a)(i) claim on bank fixed deposit interest saying it had already been given s.80P(2)(d). Can the two clauses be treated as interchangeable, and if the interest really is income from other sources, what happens to my cost of funds?
  No, they cannot. The Karnataka High Court held that s.80P(2)(a)(i) and s.80P(2)(d) are entirely different and distinct provisions, that a deduction given under (d) does not disentitle a society from claiming under (a)(i), and that the authorities cannot reject an (a)(i) claim by mixing up the two. It further held that even if the interest is assessable under s.56, the Tribunal, as the last fact finding authority, was obliged to examine the proportionate cost of funds and administrative expenses deductible under s.57, and it remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer.
• PCIT v Totagars Co-operative Sale Society High CourtHelps department
  My society earns interest on deposits with a co-operative bank. Is it deductible under 80P(2)(d)?
  On the Karnataka view, no. Interest on idle or surplus funds keeps its character as income from other sources whether the depositee is a scheduled bank or a co-operative bank, and clause (d) speaks only of 'any other co-operative society' — the words 'co-operative banks' are absent from it.
• PCIT v Totagars Co-operative Sale Society (5 January 2017) High CourtHelps taxpayerHigh Courts differ
  My society earns interest on deposits placed with a co-operative bank. The Assessing Officer says s.80P(2)(d) covers only investments with a co-operative society and a co-operative bank is not one. Is there authority the other way?
  Yes. The Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench, held that 'co-operative society' is a genus and 'co-operative bank' a species of it, so a co-operative bank is necessarily covered by the words 'co-operative society' and interest earned from it qualifies under s.80P(2)(d). It also held that the Supreme Court's decision in Totgars, being on s.80P(2)(a)(i), is inapplicable to a claim under s.80P(2)(d). But the same High Court, at the same Bench, took the opposite view five months later on the same assessee.
• Punjab State Cooperative Federation of House Building Societies Ltd v CIT-II High CourtHelps department
  We lost on s.80P before the Tribunal. Can we raise the s.57 cost of funds point for the first time in the High Court, and does interest we charge our own employees qualify under s.80P(2)(a)(i)?
  No on both counts, on this decision. The Punjab and Haryana High Court refused to entertain questions on s.57(iii) and on deduction of costs against interest assessed under s.56 because no such plea had been argued before the Tribunal, holding that they did not arise from the Tribunal's order and raised no substantial question of law. It also upheld the Tribunal's view that s.80P(2)(a)(i) is available only in respect of the society's core activities, so that interest from other banks and interest received from employees who are not members does not qualify.
• Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Co-op Ltd v ITO High CourtHelps taxpayer
  The AO cites Totgars against my credit society's deposit interest. Can I still claim 80P?
  Yes, if the deposits arose in the course of the credit business. 'Attributable to' is wider than 'derived from', so interest on short-term deposits of funds not immediately needed for lending remains within s.80P(2)(a)(i).
• ITO v Sahakara Nagar Credit Co-operative Society ITATCuts both waysNo later treatment found
  My society has nominal and associate members. Does that alone destroy the 80P deduction?
  No. Where the State Co-operative Societies Act permits those classes of membership, their presence is not by itself a ground to disallow s.80P. The outcome was mixed, though: rental, commission and miscellaneous receipts were held ineligible.
• Thane Zilla Madhyamik Shikshak Sangh Sahakari Parpedhi Maryadit v ACIT ITATHelps taxpayerNo later treatment found
  My society's chartered accountant told the penalty officer it was a co-operative bank. Can the department use that admission to deny section 80P?
  No. The Mumbai Bench held that no addition and no denial of a deduction can be made merely on the admission of a person, still less the assessee's authorised representative, without going into the actual charter documents, and that there is no estoppel against the statute. The society's chartered accountant had argued before the Commissioner (Appeals) in a section 271D penalty matter that it was a co-operative bank, and the penalty was deleted on that basis; he later filed an affidavit saying it had been a genuine misinterpretation. On the bye-laws and objects the society took deposits only from members and lent only to members, and it held no licence from the Reserve Bank of India, so it was a co-operative credit society and not a co-operative bank. Section 80P(4) did not shut it out and the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) was allowed for each of the years in appeal.
• Statutory position — s.80P(4): which bodies are shut out, and what the Banking Regulation Act 1949 actually defines CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both ways
  The Assessing Officer says my society is a co-operative bank and so s.80P(4) denies the whole deduction. What does he have to establish before he can say that?
  Section 80P(4) provides that the provisions of s.80P shall not apply in relation to any co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank, and its Explanation borrows the meanings of 'co-operative bank' and 'primary agricultural credit society' from Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Under Part V a co-operative bank is only one of three things — a State co-operative bank, a central co-operative bank or a primary co-operative bank — so unless the society answers one of those three descriptions it is not hit by sub-section (4), whatever its name or its bye-laws call it.

Listed strongest first: Supreme Court, then High Court, then Tribunal, then CBDT. Nothing here has yet been read in full by a chartered accountant — open an entry to see where it came from.