Goodricke Group Ltd v CIT-II, Kolkata — the s.33AB deduction is taken in computing the composite tea profit BEFORE rule 8 splits it sixty-forty, not on the forty per cent
High CourtHelps taxpayer
The Assessing Officer has applied rule 8 first and then given my tea company its section 33AB deduction on only forty per cent of the composite income, which has more than halved the claim. Which comes first — the section 33AB deduction or the sixty-forty apportionment?
Section 33AB comes first. On 19 May 2011 a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court held, in an appeal under section 260A for AY 1997-98, that the deduction under section 33AB is taken in computing the profit or loss of the composite tea business, and only after that profit or loss has been determined does rule 8 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 come into play to work out how much of it is liable to tax. The Tribunal below had held the opposite — that the section 33AB deduction was to be calculated on forty per cent of the income determined under rule 8 — and the High Court set that finding aside as erroneous. The Court's route was the parenthesis in section 33AB(1)(b) itself, which fixes the ceiling by reference to the profits of the business "computed under the head 'Profits and gains of business or profession' before making any deduction under this section": that is a computation under Chapter IV-D, and rule 8 operates only on the figure that computation produces. In the same judgment, and on the assessee's own concession, the Court answered the section 80HHC question the other way — a Chapter VI-A deduction on a composite tea income comes AFTER the sixty-forty apportionment, following Union of India v Warren Tea Ltd (2004) 266 ITR 226 (Cal) and the Supreme Court in CIT v Williamson Financial Services (2008) 297 ITR 17.
Statutory position — s.33AB: the tea, coffee and rubber development account — the deposit deadline, the forty per cent ceiling, the Form 3AC audit, and which assessment years each figure governs
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both ways
My client grows and manufactures tea. It put money into the NABARD account after the year had closed and now wants the section 33AB deduction. By when did the deposit have to be made, how much can be claimed, and what has to be filed by the specified date under s.44AB?
Section 33AB(1) allows a deduction to an assessee carrying on the business of growing and manufacturing tea or coffee or rubber in India which has, "before the expiry of six months from the end of the previous year or before the due date of furnishing the return of his income, whichever is earlier", either deposited with the National Bank (NABARD) in a special account under a scheme approved by the Tea Board, Coffee Board or Rubber Board, or deposited in a Deposit Account under a scheme framed by that Board with the previous approval of the Central Government. The deduction is the LOWER of the amount deposited and forty per cent of the profits of that business computed under "Profits and gains of business or profession" before any deduction under section 33AB itself, and it is expressly given before brought-forward losses are set off under section 72. The forty per cent figure is not original: "forty" was substituted for "twenty" by the Finance Act, 2001 with effect from 1 April 2002, so twenty per cent governs assessment years up to AY 2001-02 and forty per cent AY 2002-03 onwards. Coffee and rubber were not in the section at all until the Finance Act, 2003 brought them in with effect from 1 April 2004 — that is, from AY 2004-05; for AY 2003-04 and earlier the section is a tea provision only.
