Statutory position — s.92D(1)(ii) and s.92D(4) with Rule 10DA: the master file — PART A OF FORM 3CEAA IS FILED BY EVERY CONSTITUENT ENTITY EVEN IF NEITHER THRESHOLD IS CROSSED, and the two thresholds that both have to be crossed before Part B is due
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both waysNo later treatment found
Our group is nowhere near the master file thresholds. Do we still have to file anything under Rule 10DA?
Yes. This is the most-missed compliance in Indian transfer pricing. Rule 10DA(3) says in terms: "The constituent entity shall furnish Part A of Form No. 3CEAA even if the conditions specified under sub-rule (1) are not satisfied." Every constituent entity of an international group files Part A, regardless of any threshold. Part B — the substantive master file information in clauses (a) to (n) of Rule 10DA(1) — is due only where BOTH conditions in sub-rule (1) are satisfied: (i) the consolidated group revenue of the international group for the accounting year, as reflected in its consolidated financial statement, exceeds FIVE HUNDRED CRORE RUPEES; AND (ii) the aggregate value of international transactions during the accounting year, as per the books of account, exceeds FIFTY CRORE RUPEES, or, in respect of purchase, sale, transfer, lease or use of intangible property, exceeds TEN CRORE RUPEES. The obligation itself comes from s.92D(1)(ii), which requires every person being a constituent entity of an international group to keep and maintain such information and document in respect of an international group as may be prescribed, and from s.92D(4), which requires the person referred to in that clause to furnish it to the authority prescribed under s.286(1) in the prescribed manner and by the prescribed date. Section 92D was substituted in this form by Act No. 23 of 2019 with effect from 1 April 2020; for assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20 the same obligation sat in a proviso to s.92D(1), and s.92D(4) then referred to "the person referred to in the proviso to sub-section (1)". Rule 10DA(2) fixes that date as the s.139(1) due date for the return of income, and Rule 10DA(4) allows one designated constituent entity to file for all of them, provided the designation is conveyed in Form No. 3CEAB to the Joint Director referred to in Rule 10DB(1) THIRTY DAYS BEFORE the due date for furnishing Form No. 3CEAA.
Statutory position — s.271AA(2): a flat five hundred thousand rupees for failing to furnish the master file under s.92D(4), imposed by the PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY and not by the Assessing Officer — and how it differs from the two per cent penalty in s.271AA(1)
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both waysNo later treatment found
We did not file Form 3CEAA. Which penalty applies, who imposes it, and is it a percentage of anything?
Section 271AA(2) provides: "If any person fails to furnish the information and the document as required under sub-section (4) of section 92D, the prescribed income-tax authority referred to in the said sub-section may direct that such person shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum of five hundred thousand rupees." It is a flat figure — five lakh rupees — not a percentage, and the power is in the PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY under s.286(1), not in the Assessing Officer or the Commissioner (Appeals). That is what distinguishes it from s.271AA(1), which is the older penalty: without prejudice to s.270A, s.271 or s.271BA, where a person in respect of an international transaction or specified domestic transaction fails to keep and maintain the information and document required by s.92D(1) or (2), or fails to report such transaction which he is required to do, or maintains or furnishes an incorrect information or document, the ASSESSING OFFICER OR COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) may direct payment of "a sum equal to two per cent of the value of each international transaction or specified domestic transaction entered into by such person". Both sub-sections are named in s.273B, so no penalty is imposable under either if the person proves there was reasonable cause for the failure.
