Section 2(1)

Section 2(1) — the law in short

What the courts have decided on section 2(1), in one screen. Read this first; open an entry when you need the facts, the reasoning and the source.

• A.S. Glittre D/5 I/S Garonne v CIT Supreme CourtHelps taxpayer
  We paid tax on each voyage under section 172(4) and then elected under section 172(7) for a regular assessment, which came out much lower and produced a refund. The Department has refunded the tax but refused interest, saying what we paid was not advance tax. Is that right?
  No. Section 172(7) creates a legal fiction by which the payments already made under s.172(4) are treated as a payment in advance of the tax leviable for that assessment year, and the Supreme Court held that in construing that fiction all the consequences flowing from it must be assumed. The ad hoc assessment under s.172(4) is superseded and a regular assessment is made as per the provisions of the Act, so all the provisions of the Act relating to advance tax apply, and on excess payment the assessee is entitled to the excess and to interest on it.

Listed strongest first: Supreme Court, then High Court, then Tribunal, then CBDT. Nothing here has yet been read in full by a chartered accountant — open an entry to see where it came from.