Section 194C(6)

Section 194C(6) — the law in short

What the courts have decided on section 194C(6), in one screen. Read this first; open an entry when you need the facts, the reasoning and the source.

• Mohammad Yunus v ITO, Ward-1 & TPS, Kalaburagi ITATHelps taxpayerNo later treatment found
  The Assessing Officer has disallowed 30 per cent of my purchases under s.40(a)(ia) for not deducting s.194Q TDS, but the seller had already collected TCS under s.206C(1H) and it shows in my Form 26AS. Does that answer the disallowance?
  Yes, in principle. The Tribunal held that where the seller has already collected tax at source under s.206C(1H) on the same transaction, the Board's instructions on s.194Q are clear that no deduction under s.194Q is required, and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer to verify the Form 26AS entries. The concession comes from para 4.9.5(v) of CBDT Circular No. 13/2021 and is available only for the years in which s.206C(1H) was in force — in practice AY 2022-23 to AY 2025-26.
• Statutory position — s.194C: one per cent for an individual or HUF and two per cent for everyone else, the thirty thousand and one lakh thresholds, and the material-bought-from-a-third-party carve-out that takes a contract outside "work" CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both ways
  I pay a fabricator to make parts to my drawings and I pay lorry owners to move my goods. Do I deduct under section 194C, at what rate, and at what figure does the obligation start — is it thirty thousand rupees or one lakh?
  Both figures are live and they do different jobs. Section 194C(5) says no deduction is to be made where the single sum credited or paid does not exceed thirty thousand rupees, and its proviso says that once the aggregate of such sums in the financial year exceeds one lakh rupees you must deduct under the section anyway. So a single bill of Rs 35,000 is caught on its own, and a run of Rs 12,000 bills is caught the moment the year's total passes Rs 1,00,000. The rate is one per cent where the payee is an individual or a Hindu undivided family and two per cent in every other case. Whether the fabrication is "work" at all depends on whose material is used: manufacturing to your specification out of material bought from you (or from an associate of yours) is "work"; the same job done out of material the fabricator bought from anyone else is expressly excluded, and that exclusion is the line between section 194C and a contract for sale. All of this is the 1961 Act, which the CBDT's own transition FAQ says stands repealed on 1 April 2026: for a credit or payment on or after that date the corresponding provision is section 393(1) of the Income-tax Act, 2025, which carries the same rates and the same two figures.

Listed strongest first: Supreme Court, then High Court, then Tribunal, then CBDT. Nothing here has yet been read in full by a chartered accountant — open an entry to see where it came from.