What the courts have decided on section 115JA, in one screen. Read this first; open an entry when you need the facts, the reasoning and the source.
-
JCIT v Rolta India Ltd
Supreme CourtHelps departmentValidity unconfirmed
My company paid no advance tax because we only knew we would fall under MAT once the accounts were audited — is interest under sections 234B and 234C still chargeable on the tax on book profit?
Yes. The Supreme Court held on 7 January 2011 that interest under sections 234B and 234C is payable on failure to pay advance tax in respect of tax payable under section 115JA or section 115JB. Neither interest section makes any exception for the minimum alternate tax, and assessed tax means the tax determined on regular assessment, which is the tax determined by applying those provisions. Both sections 115JA and 115JB expressly say that all other provisions of the Act apply to a MAT company, and the Finance Acts provided for advance tax on them. Circular No. 13/2001 therefore has no application.
-
CIT v Tulsyan NEC Ltd
Supreme CourtHelps taxpayer
The Assessing Officer computed interest under s.234B and s.234C first and only then gave me credit for MAT under s.115JAA. My refund has turned into a demand. Is that the right order?
No. MAT credit admissible under s.115JAA must be set off against the tax payable before interest under s.234B and s.234C is calculated, not after. The right to the set-off crystallises when the tax under s.115JA (now s.115JB) is paid and does not depend on any determination by the Assessing Officer, so an assessee may take the credit into account even when estimating advance tax on its current income.
-
CIT v HCL Comnet Systems & Services Ltd
Supreme CourtHelps taxpayerValidity unconfirmed
The officer added back my provision for doubtful debts in computing book profit, calling it a provision for an unascertained liability. Is that right?
No, on the Explanation as it then stood. The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal and held that clause (c) of the Explanation to section 115JA was not attracted to a provision for doubtful debts of Rs 92,15,187. Clause (c) covers amounts set aside as provision for meeting liabilities other than ascertained liabilities, and every ingredient must be satisfied. A debt receivable is an asset, not a liability: a provision against its irrecoverability covers a probable diminution in the value of an asset, and no liability is fastened on the assessee even if the debt is never recovered. The Assessing Officer was therefore not justified in adding it back.
-
M/s Gie Jewells v PCIT
High CourtHelps departmentValidity unconfirmed
My client is a firm, not a company. It paid alternate minimum tax under s.115JC when it filed its return, along with the accountant's report. The Assessing Officer has charged interest under s.234B for not paying that tax as advance tax. Can advance tax provisions apply to AMT?
Yes, on this Court's view. The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the assessee's appeals, holding that having retained the amount which was supposed to be paid under s.115JC, s.234B was rightly invoked, and that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal's treatment of s.115JC on the same footing as s.115JA and s.115JB for the purpose of the advance-tax obligation under s.208.
-
Niko Resources Ltd v CIT
Advance RulingHelps departmentSuperseded by amendment
We are a foreign oil and gas exploration company entitled to the special deductions in s.42. Can we take those deductions before working out book profit for minimum alternate tax?
No. The Authority ruled that Niko Resources Ltd, a Canadian company exploring and developing oil and gas fields in India with Gujarat State Petrochemical Corporation Ltd under a contract with the Central Government, could not claim the special s.42 deductions in the calculation of book profit under s.115JA. Section 42 operates only when business income is computed under Chapter IV-D; s.115JA is a self-contained code that applies notwithstanding anything else in the Act, and neither s.42 nor s.293A cuts it down. The provisions of s.115JA applied to the applicant. The ruling binds only the applicant.
Listed strongest first: Supreme Court, then High Court, then Tribunal, then CBDT. Nothing here has yet been read in full by a chartered accountant — open an entry to see where it came from.