Section 11(4A)

Section 11(4A) — the law in short

What the courts have decided on section 11(4A), in one screen. Read this first; open an entry when you need the facts, the reasoning and the source.

• ACIT v Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority Supreme CourtCuts both ways
  We charge fees for our public utility work. Does that cost us charitable status under s.2(15)?
  Only if the fees are pitched above cost. Charging on a cost or nominal mark-up basis is not trade, commerce or business; charges noticeably higher than cost are. Even permissible commercial activity must be carried on in the actual course of achieving the general public utility object, and receipts from it must stay within 20 per cent of total receipts.
• New Noble Educational Society v CCIT Supreme CourtHelps department
  Our society runs a college but also earns from hostels and events. Can we get 10(23C)(vi) approval?
  Only if education is your sole object. 'Solely' means to the exclusion of all others, and the older predominant object test was rejected. Business receipts stay exempt only where the business is incidental to the educational object and separate books are kept, so letting hostels to non-students or hosting outside conferences falls outside that.
• ACIT v Thanthi Trust Supreme CourtCuts both ways
  Our trust runs a business and puts the profit into its objects. Does s.11(4A) still deny the exemption?
  No, on this decision. The Supreme Court read the substituted s.11(4A), in force from 1 April 1992, as more beneficial to a trust than the sub-section it replaced, and held that a business whose income is used by the trust to achieve its objectives is a business incidental to the attainment of those objectives. The trust ran a newspaper, applied the income to education and relief of the poor, and kept separate books, and was held entitled to s.11 from assessment year 1992-93 onwards. Read the disposal whole: for the earlier years, decided under s.11(4A) as it stood before that substitution, the exemption for the newspaper income was refused.
• Statutory position — s.164: the maximum marginal rate where beneficiaries' shares are indeterminate, and every proviso that takes a trust out of it, in sequence CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both ways
  Our discretionary trust has been charged at the maximum marginal rate under section 164 because the beneficiaries' shares are not fixed. What exactly takes a trust out of that rate, and does it help that the trust was created by my father's will?
  Section 164(1) charges the relevant income at the maximum marginal rate where income for which a section 160(1)(iii) or (iv) representative is liable is not specifically receivable on behalf of any one person, or where the individual shares of the persons for whose benefit it is receivable are indeterminate or unknown. The FIRST PROVISO takes a case out of that rate — not into exemption, but into tax 'as if it were the total income of an association of persons' — in four situations, and only four: (i) none of the beneficiaries has any other income chargeable under the Act exceeding the maximum amount not chargeable to tax in the case of an association of persons, and none is a beneficiary under any other trust; (ii) the relevant income is receivable under a trust declared by any person by will and such trust is the only trust so declared by him; (iii) the relevant income is receivable under a trust created before 1 March 1970 by a non-testamentary instrument which the Assessing Officer is satisfied was created bona fide exclusively for the benefit of the settlor's relatives, or, where the settlor is a Hindu undivided family, of the members of that family, in circumstances where they were mainly dependent on the settlor for support and maintenance; or (iv) the relevant income is receivable by trustees on behalf of a provident fund, superannuation fund, gratuity fund, pension fund or any other fund created bona fide by a person carrying on a business or profession exclusively for the benefit of persons employed in that business or profession. The SECOND PROVISO then cuts all four down where there is business income: where the income of a section 160(1)(iv) trustee consists of, or includes, profits and gains of business, the first proviso applies only if those profits and gains are receivable under a trust declared by a person by will exclusively for the benefit of a relative dependent on him for support and maintenance, and that trust is the only trust so declared by him.

Listed strongest first: Supreme Court, then High Court, then Tribunal, then CBDT. Nothing here has yet been read in full by a chartered accountant — open an entry to see where it came from.