VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawIncome-tax Rules 2026 › Rule 258
Rules 2026

Rule 258 of the Income-tax Rules, 2026

Rule 258 — Cancellation of certificate.

Where this rule sits

← Rule 257  ·  Rule 259 →

What this rule does

Sub-rule (1) provides that a certificate of registration stands cancelled when the name of the holder of the certificate is removed from the register under these rules.

Sub-rule (2) sets out what follows. When the name is removed, the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax or Commissioner of Income-tax maintaining the register must notify the fact of the removal to the authorised income-tax practitioner concerned, to other Chief Commissioners of Income-tax or Commissioners of Income-tax, who in turn are to notify the fact of the removal to the income-tax authorities subordinate to them, and to the Appellate Tribunal.

Why it is there

Registration of an authorised income-tax practitioner is recorded in a register kept by one Chief Commissioner or Commissioner, but the practitioner appears before officers and the Tribunal across the country. If cancellation were a fact known only where the register is kept, a person whose name had been removed could go on appearing elsewhere. The rule makes cancellation automatic on removal from the register, so that no separate order of cancellation is needed, and then requires the fact to be pushed outwards to everyone who might otherwise let him appear.

Who it applies to

What this means in practice

Cancellation is a consequence, not a separate decision: it happens by force of sub-rule (1) the moment the name is removed under these rules, so a practitioner looking for an order cancelling his certificate will not find one — the removal is the operative act, and any challenge is to that. The notification duty in sub-rule (2) runs in three directions and is cast in mandatory terms, and it includes the practitioner himself, so he is not left to discover the position from a refusal to be heard. The chain is deliberate: the register-keeping authority tells the other Chief Commissioners and Commissioners, and they tell the authorities subordinate to them.

An example

Illustrative only, and invented for this page. The figures are chosen to show the requirement biting, not taken from any real matter.

The name of an authorised income-tax practitioner is removed from the register maintained by a Commissioner of Income-tax. His certificate of registration stands cancelled at that point without any further order. The Commissioner notifies the practitioner, the other Chief Commissioners and Commissioners, who pass the fact down to their subordinate authorities, and the Appellate Tribunal, so that his cancelled status is known wherever he might have appeared.

Where you meet this rule

A practitioner meets this rule in the intimation of removal sent to him by the Chief Commissioner or Commissioner maintaining the register; a taxpayer does not meet it directly and instead encounters its effect when a representative is no longer able to appear on his behalf.

The words themselves

A certificate of registration shall stand cancelled when the name of the holder of the certificate is removed from the register under these rules.
Rule 258(1), Income-tax Rules, 2026.

What people get wrong

Read with

What this page does not tell you. It does not reproduce the rule. Everything above was written from the rule’s own text as the Income Tax Department publishes it — the text is here. A rule is subordinate legislation: it prescribes the method, the form or the period, and it cannot enlarge the charge the section imposes. Where a figure matters, read the sub-rule it comes from.