Settled view on section 2 22 e of the income tax act trade advances
Circular No. 19/2017 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 12 June 2017. Its subject is Settled view on section 2 22 e of the income tax act trade advances.
Accepts that trade advances in the nature of commercial transactions are not an 'advance' within section 2(22)(e), so they are not deemed dividend. The Board records that courts have so held and that those views have attained finality, and gives three illustrations from the judgments it cites: an advance to a sister concern adjusted against dues for job work (CIT v. Creative Dyeing and Printing Pvt. Ltd., Delhi High Court); an advance to a shareholder to install plant and machinery at his premises so he could do job work enabling the company to meet an export order (CIT v. Amrik Singh, Punjab and Haryana High Court); and a floating security deposit given to a sister concern against use of its electricity generators (CIT, Agra v. Atul Engineering Udyog, Allahabad High Court). Officers are directed not to file appeals on this ground, and to withdraw or not press those already filed before courts and Tribunals.
The Board observed that recent decisions holding trade advances outside section 2(22)(e) had attained finality, and issued the circular to settle the departmental position.
F.No.279IMisc.l140/2015I1TJ
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Circular No. 19/2017
New Delhi, Dated 12th June, 2017
Sub: Settled View on section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, trade advances -reg.Section 2(22) clause (e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) provides that "dividend" includes any payment by a company, not being a company in which the public are substantially interested, of any sum by way of advance or loan to a shareholder, being a person who is the beneficial owner of shares (not being shares entitled to a fixed rate of dividend whether with or without a right to participate in profits holding not less than ten per cent of the voting power, or to any concern in which such shareholder is a member or a partner and in which he has a substantial interest (hereafter in this clause referred to as the said concern) or any payment by any such company on behalf, or for the individual benefit, of any such shareholder, to the extent to which the company in either case possesses accumulated profits.
2. The Board has observed that some Courts in the recent past have held that trade advances in the nature of commercial transactions would not fall within the ambit of the provisions of section 2(22) (e) of the Act. Such views have attained finality.
2.1 Some illustrations/examples of trade advances/commercial transactions held to be not covered under section 2(22) (e) of the Act are as follows:
i. Advances were made by a company to a sister concern and adjusted against the dues for job work done by the sister concern. It was held that amounts advanced for business transactions do not to fall within the definition of deemed dividend under section 2(22) (e) of the Act. (CIT vs. Creative Dyeing & Printing Pvt. Ltd. l , Delhi High Court).
ii. Advance was made by a company to its shareholder to install plant and machinery at the shareholder's premises to enable him to do job work for the company so that the company could fulfil an export order. It was held that as the assessee proved business expediency, the advance was not covered by section 2(22)(e) of the Act. (CIT vs Amrik Singh, P&H High Courtl
iii. A floating security deposit was given by a company to its sister concern against the use of electricity generators belonging to the sister concern. The company utilised gas available to it from GAIL to generate electricity and supplied it to the sister concern at concessional rates. It was held that the security deposit made by the
1 [NJRS] 2009-LL-0922-2, ITA No. 2500[2009
2 [NJRS] 2015-LL-0429-5, ITA No. 3470[2013company to its sister concern was a business transaction arising in the normal course of business between two concerns and the transaction did not attract section 2(22) (e) ofthe Act. ( CIT, Agra vs Atul Engineering Udyog, Allahabad High Court)3
3. In view of the above it is, a settled position that trade advances, which are in the nature of commercial transactions would not fall within the ambit of the word 'advance' in section 2(22)( e) of the Act. Accordingly, henceforth, appeals may not be filed on this ground by Officers of the Department and those already filed, in Courtsrrribunals may be withdrawn/not pressed upon.
4. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.
5. Hindi version follows.
(Neetika
~~ Bansal) 1;1..\ 06l ) 7
Deputy Secretary to Government of IndiaCopy to:-
1. The Chairperson, Members and officers of the CBDT of the rank of Under Secretary and above.
2. OSD to Revenue Secretary.
3. All Pro Chief Commissioners ofIncome-Tax & All Directors General ofIncome-Tax with a request to bring to the attention of all officers.
4. The Comptroller and Auditor General ofIndia.
5. The Pro Director General ofIncome-Tax, NADT, Nagpur.
6. The Pro DGIT (Systems), ARA Centre, lhandewalan Extension, New Delhi.
7. The Pro DGIT (Vigilance), New Delhi.
8. The ADG (PR. PP & OL) for circulation as per usual mailing list.
9. ADG-4 (Systems) for uploading on lTD website.
10. Database Cell for uploading on irsofficersonline.
11. njrs_support@nsdl.co.in for uploading on NJRS.
12. Hindi section for translation in Hindi
13. Guard File3 [NJRS] 2014-LL-0926-121, ITA No. 223 0[2011
You meet it in an addition as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) on running account or advance balances between group concerns, and in asking the department to withdraw or not press such a ground in an appeal.
A closely held company advances funds to a sister concern in which its major shareholder has a substantial interest, and the amount is later adjusted against job work charges billed by that sister concern. On the reasoning the circular adopts, the advance is a commercial transaction and not an advance within section 2(22)(e), so no deemed dividend arises in the shareholder's hands.
It mentions. Circular No. 19/2017
Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.