Government of India
Circular No. 40/2016 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 9 December 2016. Its subject is Government of India.
This is an order under section 119 of the 1961 Act — section 239 of the 2025 Act. Section 119 lets the Board give directions to its own officers and, in defined cases, relax a requirement. It is an administrative power, not a power to rewrite the charge.
Tells Assessing Officers not to reopen past assessments merely because the current year's turnover has gone up. The Board clarifies that reopening under section 147 is feasible only where the officer has reason to believe that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for an assessment year, and not on a mere reason to suspect, and that an increase in turnover in a particular year, whether from the use of digital means of payment or otherwise, cannot by itself be a reason to believe that income escaped assessment in earlier years. The direction is under section 119 and is to be complied with strictly.
The Government's measures against the black economy had pushed people towards digital payment, which would leave no transaction undisclosed and might show a higher turnover in the books, and an apprehension had been raised that the higher current turnover would be used to reopen earlier low-turnover years, harassing taxpayers.
| Under the 1961 Act | Now |
|---|---|
| s.119 | s.239 |
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue (CBDT)
Circular No. 40/2016
North Block, New Delhi, the 9th of December, 2016
Subject: - Directions under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961-regd.-Recent initiatives of the Government to curb the black economy in the country has encouraged
people to shift towards digital mode of payment while making financial transactions. By adopting digital
mode of payment, no financial transactions would remain undisclosed and consequently an enhanced
turnover of business might get reflected in the books of accounts. Under the circumstances, an
apprehension has been raised that increased turnover in the current year may lead to reopening of
earlier years' cases involving lower turnover u/s 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('Act') by the Assessing
Officer causing undue harassment to tax payers.2. It is hereby clarified that reopening of cases u/s 147 of the Act is feasible only when the Assessing
Officer "has reason to believe that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any
assessment year" and not merely on the basis of any reason to suspect. Mere increase in turnover,
because of use of digital means of payment or otherwise, in a particular year cannot be a sole reason to
believe that income has escaped assessment in earlier years. Hence, Assessing Officers are advised not to
reopen past assessments in cases merely on the ground that the current year's turnover has increased.3. The above may be brought to the notice of all for necessary and strict compliance.
4. Hindi version to follow.
(F. No. 225/326/2016/ITA.II)
Copy to:
I. Chairman, CBDT and all Members, CBDT
ii. PS to Revenue Secretary
iii. All Pr.Chief-Commissioners/Pr. Directors-General ofIncome-tax
iv. All JS/CsIT, CBDT
V. ADG(PR,PP & OL) with request for placing on official handle of the department
VI. Add!. CIT, Data base Cell for uploading on Departmental Website
VII. Web manager for uploading on incometaxindia.gov.in & placing in public domain
VIII. ITCC, Central Board of Direct Taxes (3 copies)
IX. Pro DGIT(Vigilance), N.Delhi
X. C&AG, N.Delhi
XI. Guard file(Rohit Garg)
Director-ITA.II, CSDT(Rohit Garg)
Director-ITA.II, CSDT
On objections to a notice under section 148 where the recorded reasons rest on a comparison of the current year's turnover with an earlier year's.
It mentions. Circular No. 40/2016
Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.