Section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Dispute Resolution Panel - Reference to - Constitution of DRP at specified places - Corrigendum to Order No. 4/FT&TR/2012, dated 10-4-2012
F. NO. 500/15/2011—FT&TR-1 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 11 April 2012. Its subject is Section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Dispute Resolution Panel - Reference to - Constitution of DRP at specified places - Corrigendum to Order No. 4/FT&TR/2012, dated 10-4-2012.
Is a corrigendum to Order No. 4/FT&TR/2012 dated 10 April 2012, which had constituted the Dispute Resolution Panels under section 144C. It corrects the names of the panel members shown in that order for the Delhi-I and Mumbai-I panels, directing that they be read as set out in the fourth column of its table.
It is a corrigendum correcting the member names in the constitution order; no reason is stated.
Section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Dispute Resolution Panel - Reference to - Constitution of DRP at specified places - Corrigendum to Order No. 4/FT&TR/2012, dated 10-4-2012
order [F. No. 500/15/2011—FT&TR-1], dated 11.4.2012
With reference to the Central Board of Direct Taxes order No 4/FT&TR/2012 dated 10th April, 2012 constituting Dispute Resolution Panels (DRPs), in exercise of power conferred u/s 144C of Income-tax Act, 1961, the names of the DRP members in the said order may be read as per column No. 4 below.SI. No. (Column No. 1)
Place of DRP (Column No. 2)
Members of DRP as per Order No. 4/FT&TR/2012 dated 10th April, 2012 (Column No. 3)
Member of DRP to be read as (Column No. 4]1
Delhi-I
Shri Hari Kisharn, CIT, Delhi Smt. Rashmi Saxena Sahni, DIT(TP)-I, Delhi Smt. Gopal Mukherjee, CIT-V, Delhi
Shri Hari Kisharn, CIT, Delhi Smt. Rashmi Saxena Sahni, DIT(TP)-I, Delhi Smt. Gopal Mukherjee, CIT-V, Delhi3
Mumbai-I
Shri Kuntal Kumar Sen, DIT(IT)-II, Mumbai Shri Akhilesh Ranjan, CIT-XI, Mumbai Smt. V.K. Gupta, DIT(IT&TP), Ahmedabad
Shri Kuntal Kumar Sen, DIT(IT)-II, Mumbai Shri Akhilesh Ranjan, CIT-XI, Mumbai Smt. V.K. Gupta, DIT(IT&TP), Ahmedabad■■
When the composition of the Delhi-I or Mumbai-I panel that gave directions under section 144C in that period is in question.
Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.