VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Circulars › 2012 › Circular No. 09/2012
CBDT circular 17 October 2012

Circular No. 09/2012

Section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Deduction of TAX at Source - Payments to Contractors & Sub-contractors - Deduction of TAX at Source on Payment of GAS Transportation Charges by the Purchaser of Natural GAS to the Seller of GAS

What this is

Circular No. 09/2012 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 17 October 2012. Its subject is Section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Deduction of TAX at Source - Payments to Contractors & Sub-contractors - Deduction of TAX at Source on Payment of GAS Transportation Charges by the Purchaser of Natural GAS to the Seller of GAS.

What it does

Settles that gas transportation charges billed by the seller of natural gas do not attract deduction at source. Where the owner or seller of the gas both sells and transports it to the purchaser up to the point of delivery, and ownership passes at that point, the contract remains a contract for sale and not a works contract within section 194C. How the bill is drawn - transportation charges buried in the price of the gas or shown as a separate line - does not change that, and neither does the mode of transport used. Chapter XVII-B therefore does not apply to the transportation charges component paid by the purchaser to the owner or seller. Transportation charges paid to a third party transporter, whether by the seller, the purchaser or anyone else, continue to be governed by the ordinary provisions and tax remains deductible on them at the applicable rates.

Why it was issued

Representations were received from various sections of the industry about the difficulties over deduction on gas transportation charges, and the Gujarat High Court had held in Commissioner of Income-tax (TDS) v. Krishak Bharati Cooperative Limited, in Tax Appeal No. 618 of 2010 decided on 12 July 2011, that the answer turns on the terms of the agreement, and that on those facts transport of the gas was a step in performing a contract for sale rather than a contract for carriage.

Who it reaches

The provisions it speaks to

Left, the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the instrument itself names it. Right, the section of the Income-tax Act, 2025 that the department’s own concordance maps it to — which is where the same ground is now covered.
Under the 1961 ActNow
s.194Cs.393, s.402

The instrument, as the Board published it

The words below are the department’s own, reproduced from its published text. Where the department’s copy carried a publisher’s notes after the instrument, those are not reproduced.

SECTION 194C OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 - DEDUCTION OF TAX AT SOURCE - PAYMENTS TO CONTRACTORS & SUB-CONTRACTORS - DEDUCTION OF TAX AT SOURCE ON PAYMENT OF GAS TRANSPORTATION CHARGES BY THE PURCHASER OF NATURAL GAS TO THE SELLER OF GAS
Circular No. 9/2012 [F. No. 275/11/2012-IT(B)], dated 17-10-2012
Representations have been received from various sections of the Industry on the difficulties faced in the matter of Tax Deduction at Source on Gas Transportation Charges paid by the purchasers of Natural gas to the sellers of gas.
2. The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT (TDS) v. Krishak Bharati Cooperative Limited in Tax Appeal No. 618 of 2010 vide order dated 12-7-2011, has held that the question as to whether payment of Gas Transportation Charges by the purchasers of Natural gas to the Gas Distribution Companies is covered under the provision of Chapter XVII-B of Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) or not, can be ascertained only on the basis of the terms of agreement between the Gas Distributing Company and the purchaser of the Natural gas. In the operative part of the order, the Hon'ble Court says that in the facts of the abovementioned case, the agreement is for purchase and sale of gas. Transportation of gas is only a part of the entire sale transaction. Laying down the pipeline and supplying gas through such pipeline were the steps taken in furtherance of such a contract. There was a clear understanding of the parties that the ownership of gas would pass on to the buyer at the delivery point which clearly shows that transport of gas by the seller was a step towards execution of contract for sale of gas and there was no contract for carriage of goods. The Court added that Transportation of gas was only in furtherance of contract for sale of gas. The Hon'ble High Court then decided that in such a case the supply of gas is under a 'contract for sale' and not under a 'works contract' as envisaged under section 194C of the Act and hence in such a case TDS provisions are not applicable.
3. The matter has been examined by the Board. The main stakeholders in this Industry are the - Owners/Sellers of the gas (which could be a Gas Distribution Company); Transporters of gas (which could be the Owners/Sellers of the gas or a third party/parties) and the purchasers/ end-users of the gas. The Owner/Seller of the gas may transfer the ownership of the gas to the purchaser either at the point of delivery at the premises of the purchaser or at any intermediate point.
4. It is clarified that in case the Owner/Seller of the gas sells as well as transports the gas to the purchaser till the point of delivery, where the ownership of gas to the purchaser is simultaneously transferred, the manner of raising the sale bill (whether the transportation charges are embedded in the cost of gas or shown separately) does not alter the basic nature of such contract which remains essentially a 'contract for sale' and not a 'works contract' as envisaged in section 194C of the Act. Hence in such circumstances, provisions of Chapter XVII-B of the Act are not applicable on the component of Gas Transportation Charges paid by the purchaser to the Owner/Seller of the gas. The use of different modes of transportation of gas by Owner/Seller will not alter the position.
5. It is needless to mention that transportation charges paid to a third party transporter of gas, either by the Owner/Seller of the gas or purchaser of the gas or any other person, shall continue to be governed by the appropriate provisions of the Act and TDS shall be deductible on such payment to the third party at the applicable rates.
■■

What to watch

Where you meet it

On a demand for failure to deduct under section 194C on the transport component of gas purchase bills, or when settling whether to deduct on a supplier's invoice.

An example

Ours, not the Board’s: a worked case built from the rule the instrument sets, to show how it falls out.

A fertiliser company buys natural gas from a distribution company which delivers it by pipeline to the plant, ownership passing at the plant gate. The invoice shows gas at one figure and transportation at another. No deduction is required on either component. If the same company separately engages a third party to haul gas by road, deduction on that transporter's bill continues as usual.

What it names

It mentions. Circular No. 9/2012

On the same provision

Other instruments in this library that name the same provision of the 1961 Act. They are not necessarily still operative, and a later one may have replaced an earlier one without saying so.

← Letter, dated 19-10-2012  ·  F. No.500/154/2009-FTD-I, dated 16-10-2012 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.