VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCirculars1999 › Circular No. 775
CBDT circular 26 March 1999

Circular No. 775

775 dated 26 3 1999

What this is

Circular No. 775 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 26 March 1999. Its subject is 775 dated 26 3 1999.

What it does

Tells drawing and disbursing officers to stop demanding medical bills for the section 80DD deduction. For computing tax deductible from salary, it is enough that the employee furnishes a medical certificate from a Government hospital, a written declaration signed by the claimant certifying the actual expenditure on medical treatment including nursing, training and rehabilitation of the handicapped dependant, and the receipt or acknowledgement for any amount paid or deposited in the specified schemes of the Life Insurance Corporation or the Unit Trust of India. Section 80DD, as substituted for sections 80DD and 80DDA by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, caps the deduction at Rs. 40,000 in the aggregate in the hands of the parent or guardian. The clarification applies to deduction at source from salaries under section 192 for the financial year 1998-99 and onwards.

Why it was issued

The Board had learnt that some drawing and disbursing officers were insisting on medical vouchers and bills in addition to the Government hospital certificate of permanent physical disability or mental retardation.

Who it reaches

The provisions it speaks to

Left, the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the instrument itself names it. Right, the section of the Income-tax Act, 2025 that the department’s own concordance maps it to — which is where the same ground is now covered.
Under the 1961 ActNow
s.80DDs.127
s.192s.392, s.402

The instrument, as the Board published it

The words below are the department’s own, reproduced from its published text. Where the department’s copy carried a publisher’s notes after the instrument, those are not reproduced.

516. Whether it would be sufficient if the employee furnishes a medical certificate from a Government Hospital and a declaration in writing duly signed by the claimant certifying the actual amount of expenditure on account of medical treatment (including nursing) training and rehabilitation of the handicapped dependent and receipt/acknowledgement for the amount paid or deposited in the specified schemes of LIC or UTI
1. Section 80DD, substituted for sections 80DD and 80DDA by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, lays down that the deduction on ac­count of expenditure incurred by way of medical treatment (in­cluding nursing), training and rehabilitation of a handicapped dependant or amount paid or deposited in specified schemes of Life Insurance Corporation or Unit Trust of India for the mainte­nance of handicapped dependant, shall be limited to Rs. 40,000 in the aggregate while computing the total income of the parent or the guardian of such handicapped dependant.
2. It has come to the notice of the Board that some of the DDOs are asking the employees to submit medical vouchers/bills in connection with the expenses incurred on the medical treatment of their handicapped dependant apart from a certificate from the Government hospital regarding the permanent physical disability or mental retardation of the handicapped dependant.
3. It is clarified that it would be sufficient if the employee furnishes a medical certificate from a Government hospital and a declaration in writing duly signed by the claimant certifying the actual amount of expenditure on account of medical treatment (including nursing) training and rehabilitation of the handi­capped dependant and receipt/acknowledgement for the amount paid or deposited in the specified schemes of LIC or UTI. Therefore, DDOs may not insist upon production of vouchers/bills by the employees for having incurred expenditure on medical treatment of their handicapped dependants for allowing the deduction under section 80DD for the purpose of computing tax deductible at source.
4. This clarification is applicable for the purpose of Tax Deduc­tion at Source from salaries under section 192 of Income-tax Act, 1961 during the Financial year 1998-99 and onwards.

Circular : No. 775, dated 26-3-1999.

What to watch

Where you meet it

When an employer disallows a section 80DD claim at the payroll stage for want of bills, and in a short-deduction proceeding under section 201 questioning the deduction allowed in Form No. 16.

On the same provision

Other instruments in this library that name the same provision of the 1961 Act. They are not necessarily still operative, and a later one may have replaced an earlier one without saying so.

← Circular No. 776  ·  Circular No. 774 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.