VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › Circulars › 1978 › Circular No. 247
CBDT circular 21 October 1978

Circular No. 247

370. Calculation of percentage limits of entertainment expenditure under section 37(2A) - Modification to para 24.2 of Circular No. 202, dated 5-7-1976

What this is

Circular No. 247 was issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 21 October 1978. Its subject is 370. Calculation of percentage limits of entertainment expenditure under section 37(2A) - Modification to para 24.2 of Circular No. 202, dated 5-7-1976.

These are the Board’s explanatory notes to a Finance Act. They are the department’s account of what the amendments were meant to do, and they are cited constantly — but the words of the Act govern where the two part.

What it does

Corrects a sentence in the Board's own explanatory notes on the Finance Act, 1976. Paragraph 24.2 of Circular No. 202, dated 5-7-1976 had said that the percentage limits for entertainment expenditure under section 37(2A) are calculated on the profits and gains of the business as reduced by development rebate, development allowance, entertainment expenditure and investment allowance under the new section 32A. As that is not in accordance with section 37(2A), the sentence is substituted so as to read that the percentage limits are calculated on the profits and gains as computed before allowing the deduction in respect of development rebate, development allowance, entertainment expenditure and investment allowance under section 32A. Income-tax Officers are to be told of the modification.

Why it was issued

The sentence as originally worded did not accord with section 37(2A) and would have produced a smaller base and so a smaller entertainment allowance.

Who it reaches

The provisions it speaks to

Left, the provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961 as the instrument itself names it. Right, the section of the Income-tax Act, 2025 that the department’s own concordance maps it to — which is where the same ground is now covered.
Under the 1961 ActNow
s.32Ano counterpart recorded
s.37s.34

The instrument, as the Board published it

The words below are the department’s own, reproduced from its published text. Where the department’s copy carried a publisher’s notes after the instrument, those are not reproduced.

370. Calculation of percentage limits of entertainment expenditure under section 37(2A) - Modification to para 24.2 of Circular No. 202, dated 5-7-1976
1. Attention is invited to para 24.2 of the Explanatory Notes on the provisions relating to direct taxes in the Finance Act, 1976. The second sentence in the said paragraph reads as under :
"The percentage limits will, however, be calculated with reference to the quantum of profits and gains of the business or profession as reduced by not only development rebate, development allowance and entertainment expenditure but also by investment allowance under the new section 32A."
2. As this is not in accordance with the provisions of section 37(2A), the aforesaid sentence may be substituted by the following :
"The percentage limits will, however, be calculated with reference to the quantum of profits and gains of the business or profession as computed before allowing the deduction not only in respect of development rebate, development allowance and entertainment expenditure, but also in respect of investment allowance admissible under the new section 32A."
3. This modification may be brought to the notice of Income-tax Officers working in your charge.
Circular : No. 247 [F. No. 131(6)/76-TPL(Pt.)], dated 21-10-1978.

What to watch

Where you meet it

In an assessment where the entertainment expenditure allowance is computed on a base net of development rebate or investment allowance.

An example

Ours, not the Board’s: a worked case built from the rule the instrument sets, to show how it falls out.

A business has profits and gains of Rs. 10,00,000 before development rebate of Rs. 2,00,000, investment allowance of Rs. 1,00,000 and entertainment expenditure of Rs. 50,000. On the corrected reading the percentage limit is worked on Rs. 10,00,000, not on Rs. 6,50,000.

On the same provision

Other instruments in this library that name the same provision of the 1961 Act. They are not necessarily still operative, and a later one may have replaced an earlier one without saying so.

← Circular No. 250  ·  Circular No. 246 →

A circular binds the department, not you and not a court. The Board issues a circular to its own officers. An assessee may hold the department to a circular that helps him; the department cannot hold an assessee to one that hurts him, and the Tribunal and the courts decide the law for themselves.

Source: the Income Tax Department’s own published text — its page for this instrument.