VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › CBDT Circulars & Instructions › Statutory position — how DDT was abolished: the end-date written into s.115-O(1), s.115R(2) and s.115BBDA(1), and the withholding that replaced it under s.194 and s.194K
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both waysSuperseded by amendments.115-Os.115-O(1)s.115Rs.115R(2)s.115BBDAs.194s.194Ks.2(22)s.10(23D)s.10(23FC)

Statutory position — how DDT was abolished: the end-date written into s.115-O(1), s.115R(2) and s.115BBDA(1), and the withholding that replaced it under s.194 and s.194K

Everyone says DDT was abolished in 2020. Which provision actually did it, from what date, and what withholding took its place on dividend and on mutual fund income?

The Income-tax Act, 1961 was repealed on 1 April 2026. It still governs income earned up to 31 March 2026, and every proceeding about those years however late — assessment, reassessment, rectification, penalty, revision and appeal alike. Income earned from 1 April 2026 is governed by the Income-tax Act, 2025. What changed, and which Act governs your year →

Everyone says DDT was abolished in 2020. Which provision actually did it, from what date, and what withholding took its place on dividend and on mutual fund income?

No section was repealed. The abolition was done by writing an end-date into the charging words themselves: s.115-O(1) now charges only dividend declared, distributed or paid 'on or after the 1st day of April, 2003 but on or before the 31st day of March, 2020'; s.115R(2) charges only income distributed by a specified company or Mutual Fund 'on or before the 31st day of March, 2020'; and s.115BBDA(1) reaches only dividend 'declared, distributed or paid by a domestic company or companies on or before the 31st day of March, 2020'. Dividend then fell to be taxed in the shareholder's hands, with withholding revived under s.194 for dividend paid by a company and s.194K for income in respect of mutual fund units, both at ten per cent.

Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) on 2020-04-01, reported as Section 115-O of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as amended up to 2026. It bears on section 115-O, section 115-O(1), section 115R, section 115R(2), section 115BBDA, section 194, section 194K, section 2(22), section 10(23D), section 10(23FC) of the Income Tax Act 1961, in TDS Defaults and How Tax Law Is Read matters.

Superseded by amendment. The core of the entry stands: the end-dates written into s.115-O(1), s.115R(2) and s.115BBDA(1) have not been disturbed, and no section was repealed. But two of the withholding provisions the entry describes as having replaced DDT have themselves been amended since. The Finance Act, 2025 substituted 'ten thousand rupees' for 'five thousand rupees' in the first proviso to section 194, and in clause (i) of the proviso to section 194K, with effect from 1 April 2025 - confirmed on the Department's own Notes on Clauses to the Finance Bill, 2025. So any Rs 5,000 no-deduction threshold stated for s.194 or s.194K holds only for payments up to 31 March 2025; for FY 2025-26 (AY 2026-27) the figure is Rs 10,000. The Finance Act, 2025 also omitted the reference to section 206AB in s.194S(2) with effect from 1 April 2025. This states the law under the Income-tax Act, 1961, which governs every assessment year up to and including AY 2026-27 and the disputes arising from those years.

Why it matters

Knowing that the sections were amended rather than omitted is not pedantry — it decides how you read them. The sections still stand in the Act, so a notice or an appeal for FY 2019-20 or earlier is decided on the full text of s.115-O, s.115R and s.115BBDA as it applied in that year, and nothing about the 2020 change touches those years. It also means the cut-off is a distribution-date test, not an assessment-year test: a dividend declared on 30 March 2020 and paid on 5 April 2020 is inside s.115-O on the 'declared' limb, because the section charges an amount 'declared, distributed or paid' and the earliest of those events is what s.115-O(3) fixes payment to. On the replacement withholding, three points repay attention. Section 194 requires the principal officer of an Indian company, or a company which has made the prescribed arrangements for the declaration and payment of dividends within India, to deduct ten per cent before making any payment by any mode in respect of any dividend, or before making any distribution or payment to a resident shareholder of any dividend within the meaning of s.2(22)(a) to (f) — note that the deemed dividend sub-clauses are inside the deduction obligation. Its first proviso exempts an individual shareholder where the dividend is paid by any mode other than cash and the amount or aggregate for the financial year does not exceed ten thousand rupees; the section carries footnote 66, 'Sub. for "five" by Act No. 7 of 2025, w.e.f. 1-4-2025', so the threshold was five thousand rupees before 1 April 2025 and ten thousand from that date. Its second proviso exempts the Life Insurance Corporation, the General Insurance Corporation and the four companies formed under s.16(1) of the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972, any other insurer in respect of shares it owns or in which it has full beneficial interest, a business trust receiving from a s.10(23FC) special purpose vehicle, and any person notified by the Central Government. Section 194K is the mutual fund limb: ten per cent on income in respect of units of a s.10(23D) Mutual Fund, units from the Administrator of the specified undertaking, or units from the specified company, at credit or payment whichever is earlier, with a proviso disapplying it where the income for the financial year does not exceed ten thousand rupees, or 'if the income is of the nature of capital gains'. The capital gains carve-out is the point most often got wrong: redemption proceeds and switch-outs are outside s.194K entirely. Footnote 92 to that section reads 'Sub. for "five" by Act No. 7 of 2025, w.e.f. 1-4-2025', so the s.194K threshold too was five thousand rupees until 31 March 2025. And s.194K has a history worth knowing: an earlier text of s.194K records the section as 'Omitted by the Finance Act, 2016, w.e.f. 1-6-2016', so the section that exists today is a revived one and any authority on the pre-2016 s.194K must be handled with that in mind.

Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.

Not yet CA-verified. This entry was found through the sources listed under the Sources tab, and the summary reflects what those sources say. Nobody has yet read the full judgment and signed it off. Check the source before relying on it.

Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.

Related

Other authorities on the same sections.
Every authority on the provisions this decision turns on: all 20 on s.115-O · all 13 on s.10(23FC) · all 9 on s.2(22)

Used in these worked examples

Notice situations where this decision carries one of the steps.
A running current account with the family company, and the peak debit of Rs 1,18,00,000 taxed as deemed dividendThe officer has taxed the highest debit balance on our running account with the family company as deemed dividend under s.2(22)(e) in my hands, and made a protective addition of the same sum on the firm that actually received the money - how much of that survives?