VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCBDT Circulars & Instructions › Statutory position — s.36(1)(viii): the special reserve, the twenty per cent limit, the twice-the-paid-up-capital ceiling, and the s.41(4A) charge when the reserve is drawn down
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both wayss.36(1)(viii)s.41(4A)s.80-IAs.80-IA(4)s.80-IB(10)s.80P(4)Rule 6ABAA

Statutory position — s.36(1)(viii): the special reserve, the twenty per cent limit, the twice-the-paid-up-capital ceiling, and the s.41(4A) charge when the reserve is drawn down

My client is a housing finance company and has created a special reserve. How much is deductible under s.36(1)(viii), what caps it, and what happens if the reserve is later withdrawn?

My client is a housing finance company and has created a special reserve. How much is deductible under s.36(1)(viii), what caps it, and what happens if the reserve is later withdrawn?

Section 36(1)(viii) allows a "specified entity" a deduction for a special reserve created and maintained by it, of an amount not exceeding twenty per cent of the profits derived from an "eligible business" computed under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession" (before any deduction under this clause) and actually carried to that reserve account. A proviso caps the cumulative benefit: where the aggregate of the amounts carried to the reserve account from time to time exceeds twice the amount of the paid up share capital and of the general reserves of the specified entity, no allowance is made in respect of the excess. And section 41(4A) supplies the sting — where the deduction has been allowed, any amount subsequently withdrawn from the special reserve is deemed to be profits and gains of business or profession and is charged to tax in the year of withdrawal, and by the Explanation to that sub-section it is charged even if the business is no longer in existence.

Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text), reported as Income-tax Act, 1961, s.36(1)(viii), as printed on the departmental Year 2025 edition (incometaxindia.gov.in/w/section-36-64) and the Year 2024 (No. 1) edition (/w/section-36-62); s.41(4A) as printed on the Year 2019 (No. 2) edition (/w/section-41-58) and the Year 2009 edition (/w/section-41). It bears on section 36(1)(viii), section 41(4A), section 80-IA, section 80-IA(4), section 80-IB(10), section 80P(4), section Rule 6ABAA of the Income Tax Act 1961, in Deductions & Disallowances and How Tax Law Is Read matters.

Still good law. Clause (viii), its proviso and the whole of its Explanation were transcribed from two departmental editions, Year 2025 and Year 2024 (No. 1), which agree word for word; section 41(4A) was transcribed from a Year 2019 (No. 2) edition and a Year 2009 edition, which also agree word for word. That two-edition agreement is what supports the label. The instrument is established from the departmental footnote: the present form was substituted by the Finance Act, 2007 w.e.f. 1 April 2008, and section 41(4A) was inserted by the Finance Act, 1997 w.e.f. 1 April 1998. Neither Finance Act was read in its own text. Validity check as to judicial treatment could not be completed: I searched for and located, but did not read, decisions of the Karnataka High Court and of the Bangalore, Chennai, Pune, Ahmedabad and Kolkata Tribunals on this clause.

Why it matters

The clause is narrow in three ways that are easy to miss. First, the deduction is not twenty per cent of total profits; it is twenty per cent of the profits derived from the ELIGIBLE BUSINESS, and "eligible business" is defined differently for each class of specified entity. For a financial corporation specified in s.4A of the Companies Act, 1956, a financial corporation which is a public sector company, a banking company, or a co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank, it is the business of providing long-term finance for industrial or agricultural development, for development of infrastructure facility in India, or for development of housing in India. For a housing finance company it is narrower still — long-term finance for the construction or purchase of houses in India for residential purposes. For "any other financial corporation including a public company" it is narrowest of all — long-term finance for development of infrastructure facility in India only. Second, "long-term finance" is defined: a loan or advance whose terms provide for repayment together with interest during a period of not less than five years. A five-year test failed on the loan documentation defeats the claim whatever the accounts show. Third, the amount must actually be carried to the reserve account; this is a reserve-creation deduction, and the proviso then looks at the AGGREGATE carried from time to time against twice the paid up share capital plus general reserves, so a company that has been claiming for years can hit the ceiling without any change in its current-year profit. Section 41(4A) is what makes the reserve a lock: the money is taxed when it comes out, and the Explanation removes the discontinuance escape.

Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.

Not yet CA-verified. This entry was found through the sources listed under the Sources tab, and the summary reflects what those sources say. Nobody has yet read the full judgment and signed it off. Check the source before relying on it.

Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.

Related

Other authorities on the same sections.