VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case law › CBDT Circulars & Instructions › Statutory position — s.33ABA: the Site Restoration Fund for petroleum and natural gas — the deposit must be in before the year ends, the ceiling is twenty per cent, and the closure clawback is net of the Government's production share
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both wayss.33ABAs.33ABA(1)s.33ABA(2)s.33ABA(3)s.33ABA(4)s.33ABA(5)s.33ABA(7)s.33ABA(8)s.42s.288(2)s.72Rule 5AD

Statutory position — s.33ABA: the Site Restoration Fund for petroleum and natural gas — the deposit must be in before the year ends, the ceiling is twenty per cent, and the closure clawback is net of the Government's production share

My client is an oil and gas producer under a production sharing contract. It missed the year end and deposited into the Site Restoration Account in April. Does the six-month grace that tea companies get apply here too, and what is the ceiling?

The Income-tax Act, 1961 was repealed on 1 April 2026. It still governs income earned up to 31 March 2026, and every proceeding about those years however late — assessment, reassessment, rectification, penalty, revision and appeal alike. Income earned from 1 April 2026 is governed by the Income-tax Act, 2025. What changed, and which Act governs your year →

My client is an oil and gas producer under a production sharing contract. It missed the year end and deposited into the Site Restoration Account in April. Does the six-month grace that tea companies get apply here too, and what is the ceiling?

No. Section 33ABA gives no grace at all: the deposit must be made "before the end of the previous year", not within six months of it, and that single word is the commonest way the deduction is lost. The section applies to an assessee carrying on the business of prospecting for, or extraction or production of, petroleum or natural gas or both in India in relation to which the Central Government has entered into an agreement with that assessee. The deposit is either with the State Bank of India in a special account under a scheme approved by the Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, or in a Site Restoration Account under a deposit scheme framed by that Ministry. The deduction is the LOWER of the amount deposited and twenty per cent of the profits of that business computed under "Profits and gains of business or profession" before any deduction under section 33ABA — twenty, not the forty per cent that section 33AB allows — and it is given before brought-forward losses are set off under section 72. The section was inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 with effect from 1 April 1999, so it governs AY 1999-2000 onwards. One later amendment matters: Act No. 12 of 2020, with effect from 1 April 2020, substituted the audit limb of sub-section (2), so that from AY 2020-21 the accounts must be audited, and the report furnished, before the specified date referred to in section 44AB — one month before the section 139(1) due date — rather than along with the return.

Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) on 2020-04-01, reported as Section 33ABA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It bears on section 33ABA, section 33ABA(1), section 33ABA(2), section 33ABA(3), section 33ABA(4), section 33ABA(5), section 33ABA(7), section 33ABA(8), section 42, section 288(2), section 72, section Rule 5AD of the Income Tax Act 1961, in Deductions & Disallowances, How Tax Law Is Read and Assessment & Scrutiny matters.

Still good law. The text is verified on published editions carrying six different vintages — 2002, 2009, 2013, 2019, 2021 and 2024. All print the same twenty per cent figure, the same before- the-end-of-the-previous-year deadline, the same sub-section (3) without any list of circumstances, and the same sub-section (4) in its bar form. The only substantive change since the Finance Act 1999 omission of the proviso to sub-section (7) is the substitution in sub-section (2) by Act No. 12 of 2020 with effect from 1 April 2020, which this entry states; so the audit and report deadline given here governs assessment year 2020-21 onwards, and the earlier requirement to furnish the report 'along with his return of income' governs 2019-20 and earlier. That distinction decides cases on its own, because a report furnished with the return but after the specified date referred to in section 44AB is late for a year from 2020-21 and in time for an earlier one. No judicial treatment of this section has been checked and no decided case on it has been found, so nothing here is a survey of the authority. Three questions the text does not settle. Whether a deposit made on the last day of the previous year but credited by the bank afterwards is 'deposited before the end of the previous year' is untested. Whether the twenty per cent ceiling is computed on the profits of the eligible business alone where the assessee has other business income is a computation question the section states but does not illustrate. And how the closure charge in sub- section (5) is worked where the Government's profit or production share under the section 42 agreement is itself in dispute is not addressed anywhere in the section.

Why it matters

Section 33ABA looks like section 33AB and is not. Four differences decide cases. First, the deadline: before the end of the previous year, with no six-month extension and no reference to the due date for the return. Second, the ceiling: twenty per cent, against forty per cent under section 33AB. Third, the withdrawal regime: section 33ABA(3) permits withdrawal only for the purposes specified in the scheme or the deposit scheme and contains none of the five escape circumstances — closure, death, HUF partition, dissolution, liquidation — that section 33AB(3) lists. Fourth, and most important, sub-section (4) works the other way round from its section 33AB counterpart: where an amount is used to buy plant for office or residential premises, office appliances other than computers, plant already fully written off, or new plant for an Eleventh Schedule industrial undertaking, section 33ABA(4) says that NO DEDUCTION under sub-section (1) shall be allowed in respect of that amount, rather than deeming the amount to be profits of the year of utilisation. On the other side, the closure charge in sub-section (5) is unusually generous in its measure: the amount withdrawn on closure of the account is reduced by the amount payable to the Central Government by way of profit or production share as provided in the section 42 agreement before it is charged, and the Explanation deems the business to be in existence even in a year in which it is not. Two further features are easy to miss: the third proviso to sub-section (1) deems interest credited to the account to be a deposit, so accrued interest itself generates deduction, and the closing Explanation puts accrued interest inside "the amount standing to the credit of the assessee". The eight-year lock-in in sub-section (8) and its two provisos are in the same terms as section 33AB(8).

Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.

Not yet CA-verified. This entry was found through the sources listed under the Sources tab, and the summary reflects what those sources say. Nobody has yet read the full judgment and signed it off. Check the source before relying on it.

Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.

Related

Other authorities on the same sections.
Every authority on the provisions this decision turns on: all 47 on s.72 · all 9 on s.288(2)