VittSphere ONE Calculators Blog CA Firm CA Prabhakar Kumar · FCA · ICAI 560762
Case lawCBDT Circulars & Instructions › Statutory position — s.32AC: the fifteen per cent investment allowance for new plant and machinery — two different windows, two different thresholds, and a five-year lock-in that survives the allowance
CBDT Circulars & InstructionsCuts both wayss.32ACs.32AC(1)s.32AC(1A)s.32AC(1B)s.32AC(2)s.32AC(3)s.32AC(4)s.32AD

Statutory position — s.32AC: the fifteen per cent investment allowance for new plant and machinery — two different windows, two different thresholds, and a five-year lock-in that survives the allowance

A company client has been told it can claim a fifteen per cent investment allowance on new plant. Which years does section 32AC actually cover, what is the investment threshold, and what happens if the plant is sold?

A company client has been told it can claim a fifteen per cent investment allowance on new plant. Which years does section 32AC actually cover, what is the investment threshold, and what happens if the plant is sold?

Section 32AC is a spent provision and its two limbs cover different years on different thresholds. Sub-section (1), inserted by the Finance Act, 2013 with effect from 1 April 2014, applies only to a COMPANY engaged in the business of manufacture or production of any article or thing which acquires AND installs new assets after 31 March 2013 but before 1 April 2015 with an aggregate actual cost exceeding one hundred crore rupees; it gives fifteen per cent for AY 2014-15 on assets acquired and installed after 31 March 2013 but before 1 April 2014, and fifteen per cent for AY 2015-16 on assets acquired and installed after 31 March 2013 but before 1 April 2015, reduced by whatever was allowed for AY 2014-15. Sub-section (1A), inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2014 with effect from 1 April 2015, lowers the entry price: fifteen per cent where the actual cost of new assets acquired during a previous year exceeds twenty-five crore rupees and those assets are installed on or before 31 March 2017. Sub-section (1B), inserted by the same Act from the same date, kills sub-section (1A) for any assessment year commencing on or after 1 April 2018. So the whole section reaches AY 2014-15 to AY 2017-18 and no further. Whatever is allowed carries a five-year lock-in under sub-section (2): if the new asset is sold or otherwise transferred within five years of the date of INSTALLATION, otherwise than in an amalgamation or demerger, the deduction is deemed to be business income of the year of transfer, "in addition to taxability of gains, arising on account of transfer of such new asset".

Decided by the CBDT Circulars & Instructions (Not applicable — statutory text) on 2014-04-01, reported as Section 32AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, transcribed from incometaxindia.gov.in/w/section-32ac (Year: 2013), /w/section-32ac-1 (Year: 2014), /w/section-32ac-2 (Year: 2015), /w/section-32ac-3 (Year: 2016) and /w/section-32ac-4 (Year: 2017); sub-section (1) is also reproduced in part in the order of the ITAT Hyderabad in ITA No. 1424/H/2019 dated 14 June 2021. It bears on section 32AC, section 32AC(1), section 32AC(1A), section 32AC(1B), section 32AC(2), section 32AC(3), section 32AC(4), section 32AD of the Income Tax Act 1961, in Deductions & Disallowances, How Tax Law Is Read and Capital Gains matters.

Still good law. The final text is verified on two departmental pages carrying different "Year:" stamps (2016 and 2017) which print it identically, and the earlier stages of the section are verified on pages stamped Year 2013, Year 2014 and Year 2015 whose footnotes give the enacting Acts and dates. The section remains on the statute book but is spent: no deduction is available under sub-section (1) after AY 2015-16 because of the acquisition window in sub-section (1), and none under sub-section (1A) for any assessment year commencing on or after 1 April 2018 because of sub-section (1B). The five-year clawback in sub-section (2) can still operate in a later year on an allowance given in one of those years. I did not check judicial treatment beyond the ITAT Hyderabad order noted in corroboration.

Why it matters

Four points decide these claims, and three of them are date points. First, sub-section (1) and sub-section (1A) are alternatives, not a ladder: the second proviso to sub-section (1A) bars a sub-section (1A) claim for AY 2015-16 to an assessee eligible for sub-section (1) in that year. Second, the acquisition-and-installation problem was real and was fixed only part way through. As originally enacted, sub-section (1A) required the new assets to be "acquired and installed" during the previous year, so a company that bought machinery in one year and commissioned it in the next fell between two stools; the Finance Act 2016, with effect from 1 April 2016, substituted the words so that the test is now cost of assets ACQUIRED during the previous year, installed on or before 31 March 2017, and inserted a proviso that where installation is in a year other than the year of acquisition the deduction is allowed in the year of INSTALLATION. That fix operates from AY 2016-17; for AY 2015-16 the original words govern. Third, the eligibility words are "a company, engaged in the business of manufacture or production of any article or thing" — the assessee must be a company, which is a difference from section 32AD, and "manufacture or production of any article or thing" is the battleground for taxpayers who are not obviously factories. Fourth, the clawback is unusually harsh: the deduction comes back as business income AND the gain on the transfer is taxed as well, expressly. It runs from the date of installation, not the end of the year, and only an amalgamation or a demerger is carved out — and even then sub-section (3) transfers the obligation to the amalgamated or resulting company, so the lock-in follows the asset. Note that the list of exclusions from "new asset" in sub-section (4) removes second-hand plant, plant installed in office premises or residential accommodation including a guest-house, office appliances including computers and computer software, any vehicle, and plant whose whole cost is already allowed as a deduction.

Binding on the department, not on the assessee or the courts. An assessee may rely on a circular that is beneficial to them.

Not yet CA-verified. This entry was found through the sources listed under the Sources tab, and the summary reflects what those sources say. Nobody has yet read the full judgment and signed it off. Check the source before relying on it.

Read aloud by your device. Press again to stop.

Related

Other authorities on the same sections.